Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Washington · Nonprofit

GATES FOUNDATION

GATES FOUNDATION (Washington) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $17,246,810 to it, the largest being NEW VENTURE FUND ($15,802,170). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 99% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$8.1B
Revenue FY2024
23
Funders on record
$17M
Grants received
$72.7B
Net assets
4/23 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%

Against its field

GATES FOUNDATION's revenue grew 49% between 2017 and 2024.

Months of reserve0.2mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)6% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 153 philanthropy nonprofits over $100M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($5.4B) Expenses 100 ($6.3B) Net assets 100 ($42.7B)2018 Revenue 103 ($5.6B) Expenses 76 ($4.8B) Net assets 93 ($39.5B)2019 Revenue 108 ($5.9B) Expenses 84 ($5.3B) Net assets 101 ($43.2B)2020 Revenue 126 ($6.8B) Expenses 80 ($5.0B) Net assets 106 ($45.4B)2021 Revenue 124 ($6.7B) Expenses 86 ($5.4B) Net assets 117 ($49.9B)2022 Revenue 129 ($7.0B) Expenses 115 ($7.3B) Net assets 149 ($63.6B)2023 Revenue 144 ($7.8B) Expenses 140 ($8.8B) Net assets 165 ($70.4B)2024 Revenue 149 ($8.1B) Expenses 122 ($7.7B) Net assets 170 ($72.7B)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (149)Expenses (122)Net assets (170)Peer revenue range
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $5k → $1k.

5 of 23 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)99% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $31.3B from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Gates Foundation Trust). These are real filings, and they are not money GATES FOUNDATION raised.

From the IRS filings of GATES FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GATES FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 92% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

99% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GATES FOUNDATION.

92%
largest funder
99%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 88% · 2018 95% · 2019 97% · 2020 100% · 2021 63% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

0% of GATES FOUNDATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 17% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

99% of GATES FOUNDATION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $255k that is directly attributable, 50% of it comes from funders outside Washington, across 13 states.

WA
MN
OH
PA
CA
MO
MD
AZ
NC
SC
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $17M arriving through sponsors registered in 4 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 23 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like GATES FOUNDATION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GATES FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GATES FOUNDATION?
GATES FOUNDATION (Washington) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $17,246,810 to it, the largest being NEW VENTURE FUND ($15,802,170). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 99% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does GATES FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 23 organizations giving $17,246,810 in grants to GATES FOUNDATION, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GATES FOUNDATION?
NEW VENTURE FUND is the largest funder on record, with $15,802,170 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GATES FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 23funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing