Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

THE GOODTIMES PROJECT

THE GOODTIMES PROJECT (Washington) receives grants from 39 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,590,810 to it, the largest being CARE CAMPS FOUNDATION ($205,202). 21 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 63% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$998k
Funders on record
39
Grants received
$1.6M
Net assets
$3.4M
21/39 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 29%
01What it does

What The Goodtimes Project does

Mission

When cancer becomes your world, The Goodtimes Project creates caring spaces for local families to connect and kids to be kids, through camps, events, and programs. We serve families throughout Washington and Alaska with a goal of providing cost-free programing to help them reconnect with a world beyond their diagnosis. Our vision is that all families affected by childhood cancer will experience a community of hope, joy, and love.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Camp Goodtimes - we held two week long camp sessions during the summer - each was one weeklong, and combined we served approximately 165 pediatric cancer patients and their siblings from the northwest region (including children from Alaska).

    $367,827 spent
    68% of program spending
  2. Kayak Adventure Camp - we again held a week-long kayak camp for young adult pediatric cancer survivors ages 18- 25. We had 14 campers attend this camp.

    $47,213 spent
    9% of program spending
  3. You & Me Retreat - 7th year, model of one parent, one child three-day weekend retreat for parents and children in a family affected by childhood cancer to reconnect. We had 30 campers (15 parents and 15 kids) representing 15 families attend this year.

    $31,785 spent
    6% of program spending
  4. We provide one other multi day program - Sibling Ski Camp - three day ski camp for siblings of pediatric cancer patients and survivors. 24 campers attended this year, this program has been held each year since 2019. We also provide a selection of single day programs to create community through the calendar year. Examples of these programs are a day at the Zoo, a day at the aquarium, a holiday cruise, a curling event, a day at the pumpkin patch, etc. Lastly we held several single day events for different subsections of our community this year - our young adults (ages 11-17) and our program alumni (ages 18-35)

    $92,727 spent
    17% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $539,552.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($669k) Expenses 100 ($419k) Net assets 100 ($1.9M)2021 Revenue 112 ($752k) Expenses 106 ($443k) Net assets 122 ($2.3M)2022 Revenue 141 ($946k) Expenses 139 ($581k) Net assets 127 ($2.4M)2023 Revenue 132 ($883k) Expenses 182 ($763k) Net assets 140 ($2.6M)2024 Revenue 151 ($1.0M) Expenses 211 ($884k) Net assets 163 ($3.0M)2025 Revenue 149 ($998k) Expenses 211 ($885k) Net assets 180 ($3.4M)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (149)Expenses (211)Net assets (180)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $2.6M to $3.1M (+16%).

$1.9M
$2.3M
$2.4M
$2.6M
$3.1M
$3.4M
202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 8% · 2021 7% · 2025 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

79% of THE GOODTIMES PROJECT’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (83% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 14,932 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$250k
’20
$308k
’21
$366k
’22
$120k
’23
$125k
’24
$113k
’25
4.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Bridget Dolan

Executive Director

Board chair

Annette Gregorich

Board President

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

202020212022202320242025
Listed121515161317
Joined·+6+1+3+5+6
No longer listed·31282
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 7 funders to 18 funders, grant income rose $130k → $202k.

17 of 39 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 63% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE GOODTIMES PROJECT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 39 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE GOODTIMES PROJECT has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 13% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left

80% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE GOODTIMES PROJECT.

13%
largest funder
34%
top three
~14
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 39% · 2018 16% · 2019 29% · 2020 52% · 2021 28% · 2022 22% · 2023 18% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

45% of THE GOODTIMES PROJECT's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 54% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

63% of THE GOODTIMES PROJECT's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $595k that is directly attributable, 53% of it comes from Washington funders.

WA
MT
WI
NY
MA
OR
DE
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $996k arriving through sponsors registered in 11 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

THE GOODTIMES PROJECT runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 8,464 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin11% · above the median
Months of reserve4.1mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)8% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 8,464 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like THE GOODTIMES PROJECT

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

61% of spending goes to programs.

Program 61%Management 18%Fundraising 21%

Governance

16
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

86%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE GOODTIMES PROJECT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE GOODTIMES PROJECT?
THE GOODTIMES PROJECT (Washington) receives grants from 39 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,590,810 to it, the largest being CARE CAMPS FOUNDATION ($205,202). 21 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 63% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does THE GOODTIMES PROJECT have?
IRS filings report 39 organizations giving $1,590,810 in grants to THE GOODTIMES PROJECT, 21 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE GOODTIMES PROJECT?
CARE CAMPS FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $205,202 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE GOODTIMES PROJECT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Goodtimes Project →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 39 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing