Loading…
Loading…
Vermont · Nonprofit
MIDDLEBURY TRANSITIONAL CARE COALITION (Vermont) is funded by 11 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $416,818 in grants to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF ADDISON COUNTY INC ($139,772). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
MIDDLEBURY TRANSITIONAL CARE COALITION is better cushioned than half of the 1,590 housing & shelter nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,590 housing & shelter nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Government-grant reliance: 2025 65%. Grants only — government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
98% of MIDDLEBURY TRANSITIONAL CARE COALITION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (30% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
The base broadened — 1 funders to 3 as grant income moved $10k → $28k.
5 of 11 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 54% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of MIDDLEBURY TRANSITIONAL CARE COALITION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 10 of 11 funders by total. Association, not causation.
MIDDLEBURY TRANSITIONAL CARE COALITION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 34% of grant income and the top three 76%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 32% · 2019 41% · 2020 57% · 2021 32% · 2022 39% · 2023 47% · 2024 64% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
50% of MIDDLEBURY TRANSITIONAL CARE COALITION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 55% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
MIDDLEBURY TRANSITIONAL CARE COALITION is locally rooted: 68% of its grant income comes from Vermont funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 11 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
67% of spending goes to programs.
97%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 11funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing