· Private foundation
Analog Devices Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1147 grants · $922k
- $10k–50k28 grants · $541k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
- $250k+1 grant · $375k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICAX8262FOREIGN | $375,103 |
| MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC | $50,698 |
| ST JOSEPHS PARISH | $42,670 |
| SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY | $41,696 |
| CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC | $40,000 |
| STRONGWATER FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC | $28,833 |
| WOMENS FOUNDATION OF BOSTON INC | $27,309 |
| FAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC | $26,465 |
| IPSWICH RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION | $26,321 |
| CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC | $25,765 |
| BOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC | $25,756 |
| JNANA PRABODHINI FOUNDATION INC | $25,353 |
| A DOORWAY TO HOPE | $18,010 |
| MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS | $16,502 |
| MASSACHUSETTS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING FAIR INC | $16,465 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $597k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
1093 repeat relationships — 673 still active in FY2025, 420 since wound down; 269 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $660k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MSMASSACHUSETTS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING FAIR INC5× · 2021–2025 · $166k · revenue +32%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC4× · 2021–2024 · $147k · revenue +202%
Cornell University4× · 2022–2025 · $81k · revenue +15%
Funded once
- GAGAVI ALLIANCEone grant, 2021 · $932k · revenue -84%
- MGMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALone grant, 2021 · $560k
- GPGLOBAL POVERTY PROJECT INCone grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue -51%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Founded 131 years ago, the boston architectural college is a recognized institution providing excellence in practice-integrated design education to members of diverse communities with students representing 35 countries. the bac offers…
Pathfinder builds lasting and trusted local partnerships to strengthen health systems, forging resilient pathways to sexual and reproductive health and rights for all.
Education of students
To advance the rights and opportunities of children and youth worldwide.
Advancing health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships; providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.
See schedule ouniversity of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.
The massachusetts public health association (mpha) is the champion for public health in the commonwealth. we are a catalyst for change, eliminating health inequities and promoting healthy communities for all.
the organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the UCSF Foundation.
Advancing the science of water to improve the quality of life.
Allosource responsibly processes and distributes human donated tissue that enhances and saves lives.
Improving the lives of animals and people through advocacy, education, and support.
To advance professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kingdom Rock. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1545 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1545 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GAVI ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL POVERTY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING FAIR INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds BOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds STRONGWATER FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ALL WITHIN MY HANDS ↗
- Who funds MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIFE SERVICES ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION DELTA DOG INC ↗
- Who funds THE SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds JNANA PRABODHINI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PINK LEMONADE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds PRIME COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds ISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds YOUTH HAVEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE METROWEST INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA INVENTION CONVENTION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Middlesex Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · The Hamilton Company Charitable Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc · Greater Lowell Community Foundation Inc · The Saab Family Foundation · Amelia Peabody Charitable Fund Trust · Bright Funds Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Analog Devices Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Engineering for Us All Inc — 68% of income from government
- Ipswich River Watershed Association — 68% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Somerville Homeless Coalition Inc — 31% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Boston Area Gleaners Inc — 20% of income from government
- Franklin Performing Arts Company Inc — 20% of income from government
- Community Harvest Project Inc — 18% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Family Services of the Merrimack Valley Inc — 11% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Hope Chinese Charter School — 7% of income from government
- Merrimack Valley Food Bank Inc — 3% of income from government
- Discovery Museum Inc — 3% of income from government
- Franklin Food Pantry Inc — 3% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Entrepreneurship for All Inc — 2% of income from government
- Essex County Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Urbanity Dance Inc — 1% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Native Arts and Cultures Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Lazarus House Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- American Repertory Theatre Co Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
- West Suburban Young Men's Christian Association — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Buckingham Browne & Nichols School — 0% of income from government
- Riverview School Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Analog Devices Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Analog Devices Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.