· Public charity
JustGive Inc
Increase charitable giving by connecting people with the charities and causes they care about.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $99,277 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $545,489 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $446,212 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREATNONPROFITS | $29,353 |
| SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC | $15,180 |
| FRIENDS OF MOY-MO-DA-YO- INC | $10,000 |
| ANNIERUTH FOUNDATION INC | $9,800 |
| DYSLEXIA CENTER OF THE PACIFIC INC DCP | $7,000 |
| SOLDIERS ANGELS | $6,195 |
| NAVAJO COUNTY FRIENDS OF CASA INC | $6,100 |
| INTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS FUND INC | $5,325 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC | $5,279 |
| AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC | $5,045 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $3.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
481 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 477 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches5× · 2017–2021 · $1.2M · revenue +46%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC7× · 2017–2023 · $566k · revenue +98%
Feeding America3× · 2017–2021 · $462k · revenue +84%
Funded once
- SPSTUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $248k · revenue +35%
- SDSERVICIOS DE CUIDADO OPTIMO INCone grant, 2023 · $201k
- CGCULTURETRUST GREATER PHILADELPHIAgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $190k · revenue +126%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…
To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.
Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is The Shepherds Way. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1612 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1612 of the 1,787 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC ↗
- Who funds GREATNONPROFITS ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds MILLENNIAL MUSIC ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma Blood Institute ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds STUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds LORD'S PANTRY OF DOWNINGTOWN ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds Planned Pethood International ↗
- Who funds CULTURETRUST GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds Charity Bridge Fund ↗
- Who funds PORCHLIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds SchoolCARE ↗
- Who funds WISHBONEORG ↗
- Who funds MCMAHONRYAN CHILD ADVOCACY SITE INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds RENEWAL MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC ↗
- Who funds MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HELP ONE CHILD MISSION TO CHILDREN AT RISK ↗
- Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Bright Funds Foundation · Tisbest Philanthropy · Agilent Technologies Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Credit Suisse Americas Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Leo M Shortino Family Foundation · Give Lively Foundation Inc · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Rotary Club of San Jose Foundation · Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Health Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization JustGive Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Team Walker Inc — 68% of income from government
- Fallon Community Health Plan Inc — 58% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Oaks Integrated Care Inc — 31% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Central Connecticut Coast Young Men's Christian Association Inc — 14% of income from government
- Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Oklahoma Blood Institute — 2% of income from government
- Tidalhealth Nanticoke Inc — 1% of income from government
- All Our Kin Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Possible Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to JustGive Inc?
Find your warmest path to JustGive Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.