New York · Nonprofit
INWOOD HOUSE
INWOOD HOUSE (New York) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $66,700 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF NEW YORK CITY ($54,200). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2017
- $2.5M
- Funders on record
- 2
- Grants received
- $67k
- Net assets
- $0
What Inwood House does
Mission
Inwood House is dedicated to helping teens become healthy, selfreliant adults. We help teens take charge of their lives by (1) facilitating the development of the knowledge, skills, and self-esteem needed to set life goals, make responsible decisions, and avoid teenage pregnancy; (2) providing a continuum of care for pregnant and parenting teens in foster care that builds on their strengths and moves them toward self-sufficiency; and (3) being a source of hope, guidance, and opportunity.
As stated on its FY2017 Form 990.
Program
Child welfare services - support to pregnant teens includes 24-hour comprehensive residential care for pregnant teens who are in foster care, homeless or adjudicated. Services include intensive maternal health and parenting education, doula partnerships and childbirth preparation, education assessment and placement, education related to pregnancy and child development, career development, mentoring, financial literacy education, mental health services, preparing for co-parenting, teen choice, comprehensive sexuality education, family planning, parenting classes, knitting groups and social and cultural recreational activities. It includes foster family care and small group homes for teen mothers and their babies. For the six months ended december 31, 2016, Inwood House served a total of 20 clients in this program.
The first program described on its most recent Form 990, which lists programs largest first by expense.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2019: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $60k → $7k.
1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 19% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of INWOOD HOUSE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
INWOOD HOUSE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 81% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund INWOOD HOUSE.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 79% · 2019 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of INWOOD HOUSE's grant income comes from New York funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $13k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Organizations like INWOOD HOUSE
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In New York
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
81% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
95%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 2 states
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INWOOD HOUSE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds INWOOD HOUSE?
- INWOOD HOUSE (New York) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $66,700 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF NEW YORK CITY ($54,200). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does INWOOD HOUSE have?
- IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $66,700 in grants to INWOOD HOUSE, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of INWOOD HOUSE?
- UNITED WAY OF NEW YORK CITY is the largest funder on record, with $54,200 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like INWOOD HOUSE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Inwood House →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2017 (financials across 2017–2017), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing