GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

Government-grant reliance: 2017 16% · 2018 14% · 2019 19% · 2020 23% · 2021 25% · 2022 20% · 2023 20% · 2024 24% · 2025 22%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 58 funders to 168 funders, grant income rose $2.8M → $11M.

41 of 366 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 29% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $2k from one payer (the payer's own filing calls it a related party, largest Bechtolt Private Family Foundation). These are real filings, and they are not money GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK raised.

From the IRS filings of GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 366 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 17% of grant income, and it takes 7 funders to reach half.

64% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK.

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 16% · 2018 16% · 2019 51% · 2020 11% · 2021 20% · 2022 10% · 2023 22% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 65% give in more than one year at all.

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

78% of GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK's grant income comes from Pennsylvania funders.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $22M arriving through sponsors registered in 22 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.