Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

The Health Trust

The mission is to build health equity in silicon valley.

$3.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$450k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$10MFood & Nutrition$5.1MHuman Services$3.4MHousing & Shelter$1.0MYouth Development$946kPhilanthropy$760kCrime & Legal$736kCommunity Improvement$545kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 24 grants below total $3,589,374 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,690,384 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $101,010 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $32k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $2.4M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.2M
$125,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$137M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$450,000
YOUTH ALLIANCE$407,000
VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION$300,000
GARDNER HEALTH SERVICES$205,000
ROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$200,000
INDIAN HEALTH CENTER OF SANTA CLARA VALLEY INC$180,000
HUNGER AT HOME$150,000
SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY$150,000
AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT$125,000
FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC$125,000
WEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES$125,000
KOREAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES$125,000
VEGGIELUTION$122,200
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SAN BENITO COUNTY$120,000
THE UNITY CARE GROUP$120,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%INSTITUTE ON AGING: $150k → 10%SUN STREET CENTERS: $130k → 12%SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $132k → 10%SUN STREET CENTERS: $75k → 12%Sun Street Centers: $50k → 12%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $150k → 8%SUN STREET CENTERS: $43k → 12%THE UNITY CARE GROUP: $120k → 8%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $94k → 8%JOVENES DE ANTANO DEL CONDADO DE SAN BENITO: $86k → 7%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $75k → 8%LIFE SERVICES ALTERNATIVES: $60k → 8%AVENIDAS: $50k → 8%YMCA SILICON VALLEY: $137k → 8%YMCA SILICON VALLEY: $90k → 8%AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT: $204k → 8%AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT: $125k → 8%PORTUGUESE ORGANIZATION FOR SOCIAL SERVICES AND OPPORTUNITIES: $100k → 8%AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $250k → 8%HUNGER AT HOME: $173k → 8%HUNGER AT HOME: $150k → 8%AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $125k → 8%Recovery Cafe San Jose: $41k → 8%RECOVERY CAFE: $33k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC: $150k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC: $125k → 8%BILL WILSON CENTER: $153k → 8%sacred Heart community services: $416k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICES: $150k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICES: $101k → 8%MARTHA'S KITCHEN: $50k → 8%PATH (People Assisting the Homeless): $57k → 8%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $43k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $103k → 8%FOSTERING PROMISE: $75k → 8%VALLEY VERDE: $127k → 8%VALLEY VERDE: $88k → 8%VALLEY VERDE: $48k → 8%Valley Verde: $42k → 8%Live oak adult day services: $10k → 8%catholic charities: $87k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $75k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $175k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA: $58k → 8%RAHIMA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $125k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19M · 46 repeat orgs$4.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +99% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

46 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
46

Total granted

$19M
$4.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+23%

Still filing today

93%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $323k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Public Health Institute
    4× · 2017–2021 · $1.9M · revenue +130%
  • LF
    LOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN
    5× · 2018–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +451%
  • RC
    ROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +501%

Funded once

  • CO
    County of Santa Clara
    one grant, 2022 · $645k
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR HISPANIC EDUCATION
    one grant, 2021 · $215k · revenue +5%
  • SC
    South County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Centergraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $203k · revenue +25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Health Trust

The mission is to build health equity in silicon valley.

Health
2
Instituto Familiar De La Raza

Instituto provides hiv related services and social service including health promotion, education, prevention, early intervention, case management and clinical and artistic mentoring services, psychological and psychiatric interventions as…

—
3
Santa Cruz Community Health Centers

Our mission is to improve the health of our patients and the community and advocate the feminist goals of social, political, & economic equality.

Health
4
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
5
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
6
Silicon Valley Allied for the Common Good

We are a non-partisan network of civic associations, faith-based organizations and nonprofits that come together to effect change on a larger scale than we could alone. We identify shared issues affecting our communities (such as housing…

Human Services
7
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
8
Silicon Valley Independent Living Center

SVILC builds disability identity, culture, pride, creating opportunities for personal and community transformation, and partnering with others to ensure that civil and human rights are protected.

Human Services
9
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
10
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
11
El Concilio California

Empowering diverse communities in california's central valley.

Human Services
12
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sunnyvale Community Services and the most unlike its peers is The 1440 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%1%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr15%28%20–35yr16%32%35–55yr9%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr15%31%20–35yr16%28%35–55yr9%22%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/96
the rest of the field
11%
1,144/10,624

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

86 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 86 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
85/86
Grantees still filing
64/86
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Public Health Institute — $1,900,397 · HealthPublic Health InstituteROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $1,445,800 · HealthROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERGARDNER FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK INC — $1,017,000 · HealthGARDNER FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK IN…VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF) — $724,500 · HealthVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF)INDIAN HEALTH CENTER OF SANTA CLARA VALLEY — $562,500 · HealthINDIAN HEALTH CENTER OF SANTA CL…Working Partnerships USA — $286,500 · HealthTHE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC — $266,177 · Health+7 more — $817,241 · Health+7 moreSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE — $666,914 · Human ServicesSACRED HEART COMMUNITY…AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY — $374,812 · Human ServicesAFRICAN AMERICAN COMMU…AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND ENPOWERMENT — $329,256 · Human ServicesAMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CE…HUNGER AT HOME — $322,500 · Human ServicesHUNGER AT HOMEPARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC — $319,037 · Human ServicesPARENTS HELPING PARENT…Valley Verde — $304,738 · Human ServicesValley VerdeSUN STREET CENTERS — $298,000 · Human ServicesSUN STREET CENTERSFAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC — $275,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUS…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY — $227,081 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY — $220,781 · Human ServicesJovenes de Antano del Condado de San Benito — $186,250 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC — $175,000 · Human Services+14 more — $1,301,255 · Human Services+14 moreCommunity Health Partnership Inc — $860,340 · OtherCommunity Health Partnership…County of Santa Clara — $644,757 · OtherCounty of Santa ClaraFIRST 5 SAN BENITO — $291,043 · OtherTHE FOUNDATION FOR HISPANIC EDUCATION — $215,000 · OtherVEGGIELUTION — $947,845 · OtherVEGGIELUTIONWEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC — $627,500 · OtherWEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVIC…+34 more — $2,581,494 · Other+34 moreLOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN — $1,587,374 · Food & NutritionLOAVES & FI…SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $452,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARV…SOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES fka ST JOSEPHS FAMILY CENTER — $195,700 · Food & NutritionSOUTH COUNT…FRESH APPROACH — $159,069 · Food & NutritionFRESH APPRO…THE FOOD TRUST — $90,320 · Food & NutritionCommunity Seva Inc — $89,750 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SAN BENITO COUNTY — $550,666 · EducationSCHOOL HEALTH CLINICS OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY — $417,694 · EducationSILICON VALLEY COUNCIL OF NONPROFITS — $369,700 · EducationTHE TOWER FOUNDATION OF SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY — $97,500 · Education+3 more — $65,052 · EducationYOUTH ALLIANCE — $1,353,000 · Crime & LegalSilicon Valley Community Foundation — $1,025,000 · PhilanthropyTHE 1440 FOUNDATION — $55,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $7,675 · Philanthropy
Health$7,020,115Human Services$5,000,624Other$6,167,979Food & Nutrition$2,574,213Education$1,500,612Crime & Legal$1,353,000Philanthropy$1,087,675

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPublic Health Institute — $1,900,397 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN — $1,587,374 over 5y, 16% of budgetROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $1,445,800 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetYOUTH ALLIANCE — $1,353,000 over 8y, 6.4% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation — $1,025,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGARDNER FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK INC — $1,017,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetVEGGIELUTION — $947,845 over 5y, 13% of budgetCommunity Health Partnership Inc — $860,340 over 5y, 14% of budgetVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF) — $724,500 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE — $666,914 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetWEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC — $627,500 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetINDIAN HEALTH CENTER OF SANTA CLARA VALLEY — $562,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SAN BENITO COUNTY — $550,666 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $452,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSCHOOL HEALTH CLINICS OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY — $417,694 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY — $374,812 over 2y, 11% of budgetSILICON VALLEY COUNCIL OF NONPROFITS — $369,700 over 5y, 9.1% of budgetAMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND ENPOWERMENT — $329,256 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetHUNGER AT HOME — $322,500 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetPARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC — $319,037 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetValley Verde — $304,738 over 4y, 21% of budgetSUN STREET CENTERS — $298,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetWorking Partnerships USA — $286,500 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC — $275,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetTHE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC — $266,177 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY — $227,081 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY — $220,781 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR HISPANIC EDUCATION — $215,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSCHOOL OF ARTS AND CULTURE AT MHP — $203,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSouth County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center — $202,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKorean American Community Services Inc — $202,500 over 2y, 12% of budgetSOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES fka ST JOSEPHS FAMILY CENTER — $195,700 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJovenes de Antano del Condado de San Benito — $186,250 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetCENTRAL COAST YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $183,323 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC — $175,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBAY AREA COMMUNITY HEALTH — $170,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES — $165,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH APPROACH — $159,069 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetBILL WILSON CENTER — $152,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetINSTITUTE ON AGING — $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBay Area Womens Sports Initiative — $150,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA DENTAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $149,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetFIRST COMMUNITY HOUSING — $145,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY — $132,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRAHIMA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $125,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC — $120,085 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNITY CARE GROUP — $120,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLatina Coalition of Silicon Valley — $116,665 over 2y, 12% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Destination Home SV c…San Jose Mercury News…The Sobrato Family Fo…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Sunlight GivingSilicon Valley Commun…The David and Lucile …Valley Health Foundat…Second Harvest of Sil…Rotary Club of San Jo…Gordon E and Betty I …United Way of the Bay…
Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA77.9× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sunlight Giving · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Valley Health Foundation (Vhf) · Second Harvest of Silicon Valley · Rotary Club of San Jose Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Health Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 69%
  • Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc — 69% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 97 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines