· Private foundation
Agilent Technologies Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $417k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+2 grants · $3.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION | $2,009,045 |
| DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $1,043,585 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE | $200,000 |
| SOS SAHEL USA INC | $200,000 |
| THE UK ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION | $194,526 |
| TECHNOSERVE INC | $150,000 |
| FRIENDS OF IHES INC | $100,000 |
| AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS | $100,000 |
| HAUS DES STIFTENS FUR UNTERNEHMEN & NON-PROFITS GGMBH | $99,920 |
| CHARITABLE GIVING | $98,498 |
| NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITYNEWRI | $95,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE | $50,000 |
| CANADIAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION | $31,527 |
| UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE | $25,000 |
| SCIENCE IS ELEMENTARY | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 81% of grant dollars ($13M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 19% that went abroad ($3.1M) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $539k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 19% of all-years giving ($3.1M)
13 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 50% of Agilent Technologies Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
31 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $659k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IRInternational Rescue Committee INC4× · 2020–2024 · $455k · revenue +63%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches3× · 2019–2024 · $202k · revenue +39%
- SISCIENCE IS ELEMENTARY INC2× · 2022–2024 · $84k · revenue +83%
Funded once
- CCYBERGRANTSone grant, 2018 · $430k
- CECYBERGRANTS EE MATCHone grant, 2019 · $221k
- UWUNITED WAY OF INDIAone grant, 2021 · $149k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…
University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Northeastern & Central California and the most unlike its peers is Classical Arts Society of Houston. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 33% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
630 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 630 of the 774 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Friends of IHES Inc ↗
- Who funds SOS SAHEL USA INC ↗
- Who funds TECHNOSERVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CANARY FUND DBA CANARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE IS ELEMENTARY INC ↗
- Who funds SAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences ↗
- Who funds THE MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SEEDING LABS A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds NVOLVE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · The Sobrato Family Foundation · United Way of Delaware · Bright Funds Foundation · Rotary Club of San Jose Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Delaware Community Foundation Inc · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Wsfs Cares Foundation · Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Agilent Technologies Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Family Promise of Northern New Castle County — 73% of income from government
- Kind to Kids Foundation — 69% of income from government
- United Way of Delaware — 58% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Lund Family Center Inc — 34% of income from government
- Food Bank of Delaware Inc — 26% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Delaware Inc — 19% of income from government
- Faithful Friends Inc — 15% of income from government
- Delaware Nature Society Inc — 13% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- The Morgan State University Foundation Inc — 7% of income from government
- Gaining Ground Inc — 5% of income from government
- 826 Boston Inc — 3% of income from government
- Seeding Labs a Non-Profit Corporation — 1% of income from government
- Delaware Bioscience Association Inc — 0% of income from government
- Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.