Skip to content

Oregon · Nonprofit

THESE NUMBERS HAVE FACES

THESE NUMBERS HAVE FACES (Oregon) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $829,403 to it, the largest being MICAH 68 FOUNDATION ($260,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$248k
Funders on record
15
Grants received
$829k
Net assets
$121k
9/15 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 35%
01What it does

What These Numbers Have Faces does

Mission

We believe educated, empowered, and community-driven young people are the best vehicles for social change. To solve many of the problems africa faces, the continent needs talented young people with leadership skills and a deep passion for their communities. Our program operates out of our rwandan headquarters serving students from rwanda, burundi, and dr congo.university leadership program: our work focuses on three aspects: educate, equip, and empower. Women's empowerment initiative: research has shown the best way to overcome poverty is by educating and empowering women. For this reason, These Numbers Have Faces makes sure at least 50% of our students are female.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. In 2024, These Numbers Have Faces provided access to a university education for 70 students. We also facilitated monthly leadership development workshops to equip them with the leadership and professional skills to be effective selfless leaders who make a transformational difference in their communities. 2024 outcomes include:---16 students were supposed to graduate in 2024. All 16 indeed graduated successfully.---all of our graduating students were able to find meaningful employment by the end of the year.---all 70 of our students completed their community impact projects for this academic year, impacting in life-changing ways the lives of over 5,000 people. These projects included public health, engineering, agriculture, nutrition, girls pursuing stem careers, and more.other 2024 accomplishments include:---facilitated 9 monthly leadership development workshops throughout the academic year.---facilitated 3 quarterly women's empowerment workshops throughout the academic year.---facilitated 3 quarterly men's workshops throughout the academic year.

    $215,944 spentof which $149,751 as grants
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $215,944.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($780k) Expenses 100 ($847k) Net assets 100 ($332k)2018 Revenue 77 ($604k) Expenses 87 ($739k) Net assets 64 ($211k)2019 Revenue 59 ($463k) Expenses 57 ($480k) Net assets 58 ($194k)2020 Revenue 50 ($391k) Expenses 41 ($348k) Net assets 72 ($238k)2021 Revenue 51 ($397k) Expenses 38 ($318k) Net assets 96 ($318k)2022 Revenue 45 ($354k) Expenses 43 ($367k) Net assets 92 ($304k)2023 Revenue 33 ($260k) Expenses 44 ($369k) Net assets 59 ($195k)2024 Revenue 32 ($248k) Expenses 38 ($322k) Net assets 36 ($121k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (32)Expenses (38)Net assets (36)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $331k to $209k (−37%).

$408k
$330k
$256k
$288k
$356k
$331k
$209k
$154k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 10% · 2021 12%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of THESE NUMBERS HAVE FACES’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (57% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 24,946 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$67k
’17
−$135k
’18
−$17k
’19
$44k
’20
$80k
’21
−$13k
’22
−$110k
’23
−$74k
’24
5.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

James Pressnell

Executive director

Board chair

Kris Kuhn

Board chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1112555555
Joined·+1+1+0+0+1+1+0
No longer listed·0800110
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 7 funders to 5 funders, grant income fell $119k → $68k.

8 of 15 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 44% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THESE NUMBERS HAVE FACES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THESE NUMBERS HAVE FACES has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 31% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

61% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THESE NUMBERS HAVE FACES.

31%
largest funder
65%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 42% · 2018 41% · 2019 47% · 2020 54% · 2021 47% · 2022 45% · 2023 44% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

42% of THESE NUMBERS HAVE FACES's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 60% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

THESE NUMBERS HAVE FACES draws 68% of its grant income from funders outside Oregon, across 4 states in all.

ID
MI
OR
DE

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Oregon out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $364k arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

THESE NUMBERS HAVE FACES's revenue fell 68% between 2017 and 2024.

Operating margin−30% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve5.6mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−15% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 22,812 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like THESE NUMBERS HAVE FACES

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Oregon

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

67% of spending goes to programs.

Program 67%Management 30%Fundraising 3%

Governance

4
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OR

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THESE NUMBERS HAVE FACES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THESE NUMBERS HAVE FACES?
THESE NUMBERS HAVE FACES (Oregon) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $829,403 to it, the largest being MICAH 68 FOUNDATION ($260,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THESE NUMBERS HAVE FACES have?
IRS filings report 15 organizations giving $829,403 in grants to THESE NUMBERS HAVE FACES, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THESE NUMBERS HAVE FACES?
MICAH 68 FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $260,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THESE NUMBERS HAVE FACES find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds These Numbers Have Faces →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 15 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing