Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

To increase charitable giving by providing individual donors with a platform through which they can make tax-deductible contributions to various charitable organizations.

$1.6B
Granted FY2024still arriving
19,253
Grants FY2024still arriving
53
States reached
$40M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$1.6BPhilanthropy$776MHealth$675MReligion$564MArts & Culture$344MInternational$306MHuman Services$240MEnvironment$200MOther$0
02FY2024 · 19253 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 19,253 grants below total $1,224,570,192 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,649,055,373 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $424,485,181 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6086 grants · $33M
  • $10k–50k9508 grants · $177M
  • $50k–250k2977 grants · $283M
  • $250k+682 grants · $732M
$11,000
Median grant
53
States reached
$9.1B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Permanent Archive Fund$40,000,000
Archive Sustaining Foundation$40,000,000
Open Library of Canada$20,000,000
University of Nevada-Reno Foundation$18,085,000
Aurora Humanitarian Initiative Foundation$11,250,000
MS GIFT$10,750,000
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints$10,162,186
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine$10,010,000
Radha Krishna Dham$9,215,709
Rush University Medical Center$8,342,500
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford University$7,300,000
The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc$6,399,886
MALIBU JEWISH CENTER & SYNAGOGUE$6,135,685
The Catholic University of America$6,105,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION$6,027,650
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $122.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RANCHO SANTA FE WOMENS FUND: $1.0M → 11%LAKE GEORGE LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $686k → 10%La Cosecha Community Supported Agriculture: $4.4M → 14%Vital Connections Inc: $615k → 8%Angel Armies Inc: $700k → 4%NEVADA CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC: $1.4M → 13%Indiaspora: $1.0M → 10%ZERO TO THREE: $4.3M → 14%SOUTH FLORIDA HUNGER COALITION: $720k → 13%Hopee Foundation Inc: $697k → 7%ORLANDO HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $990k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $1.5M → 13%Community Violence Intervention Center Inc: $1.0M → 13%GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20.0M → 16%AUTISM PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 10%NYINGMA INSTITUTE: $665k → 10%Gay and Lesbian Community Center of Southern Nevada Inc: $1.1M → 13%AUTISM PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 10%AUTISM PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 10%YOUTHBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10.0M → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC: $1.1M → 19%IITM FOUNDATION: $905k → 8%AUTISM PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 10%THE HARKER SCHOOL: $1.2M → 8%AUTISM PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 10%NEW COMMUNITY CHURCH: $725k → 7%AUTISM PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $650k → 10%Mobilize Love: $600k → 10%Society of St Vincent de Paul of Alameda County: $1.0M → 10%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $870k → 14%Homewerks NP: $1.8M → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA: $835k → 10%Jewish Family Service of Seattle: $1.0M → 9%PROXIMITY DESIGNS: $1.0M → 14%BUSH SCHOOL: $920k → 9%SOCIAL FINANCE INC: $1.0M → 16%Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Washington Inc: $3.5M → 14%THE VILLAGE INC: $525k → 8%STANFORD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS: $40.1M → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $836k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $558k → 10%Home of Hope Inc: $720k → 10%New Story: $850k → 10%New Story: $700k → 10%NEW STORY INC: $510k → 10%American Red Cross: $522k → 14%CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $1.1M → 14%CHARITY GLOBAL INC: $708k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9B · 1713 repeat orgs$339M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against -32% for the ones you funded once.

1713 repeat relationships — 1493 still active in FY2024, 220 since wound down; 54 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1713
111

Total granted

$2.9B
$186M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
-32%

Still filing today

81%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $152M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    STANFORD BUSINESS SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $61M · revenue +977% · 26% of their budget
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $45M · revenue +64%
  • BA
    BAY AREA RESCUE MISSION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $40M · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $29M
  • NP
    NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST
    one grant, 2020 · $13M
  • BI
    BIOVERSITY INTERNATIONAL USA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $9.0M · revenue -67% · 94% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

Founded 131 years ago, the boston architectural college is a recognized institution providing excellence in practice-integrated design education to members of diverse communities with students representing 35 countries. the bac offers…

—
2
University of New Haven

See schedule ouniversity of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.

Education
3
Augustana College

Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.

Education
4
University of the Sciences in

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders in the sciences. see sch. ouniversity of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and…

—
5
Oklahoma City University

Oklahoma city university prepares all learners to create, lead and serve.

Education
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
The Rockefeller University

A world-renowned center for research and graduate education.

Education
8
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

the organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the UCSF Foundation.

Education
12
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Embolden creative leaders to transform society through equity, empathy, & imagination.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tiger Woods Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Saddle Horse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Environmental Conservation …Christian Missionary Organi…Public Library OperationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity College Foundatio…Cancer Support ServicesSenior Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity Arts CentersAnimal Rescue and ShelterAffordable Housing Developm…Youth Sports ProgramsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Local Food System Organizat…Developmental Disabilities …Youth Development ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesEquine Therapy ProgramsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…School District FoundationsLocal History MuseumsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Affordable Housing Construc…Pregnancy Support ServicesChristian Youth CampsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Domestic Violence ServicesYmca Youth DevelopmentFaith-Based Social ServicesSchool Parent OrganizationsLgbtq+ Community SupportYouth Mentoring ProgramsCommunity Food PantriesDance Arts OrganizationsElementary Literacy TutoringAddiction Recovery ServicesFood Banks and PantriesYouth Development CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Military Veterans SupportCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%33%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%216/30,752
the rest of the field
12%
205,948/1,788,813

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

1637 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1637 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

221
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
236
Early backer (in before they grew)
1626/1637
Grantees still filing
1304/1637
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

STANFORD BUSINESS SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $60,885,250 · EducationSTANFORD BUSINESS SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCI…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $58,682,632 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND ST…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $45,421,604 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYPermanent Archive Fund — $40,000,000 · EducationArchive Sustaining Foundation — $40,000,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $35,495,483 · Education+59 more — $535,647,004 · Education+59 moreNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $72,829,102 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILAN…DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $50,508,092 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED C…MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $35,696,779 · PhilanthropyMORGAN STANLEY …AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $26,035,774 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDOWM…THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $21,394,475 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN DIEGO F…MARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $14,914,579 · PhilanthropyAIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATION — $13,788,854 · PhilanthropyBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD — $13,267,371 · Philanthropy+17 more — $87,359,391 · Philanthropy+17 moreIndividual grant recipient — $28,889,882 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS — $23,259,708 · OtherSOME INC — $19,755,082 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $30,856,604 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUN…AURORA HUMANITARIAN INITIATIVE FOUNDATION INC — $20,200,000 · Other+61 more — $429,570,485 · Other+61 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $246,817,809 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INV…RURAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $22,540,000 · Community ImprovementRURAL DEVELO…+1 more — $7,541,415 · Community ImprovementHEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $123,170,051 · HealthHEBREW HOM…Children's Hospital Los Angeles — $21,129,550 · HealthChildren's…BREAKTHROUGH T1D — $9,907,359 · HealthMAYO CLINIC — $8,602,521 · HealthRush University Medical Center — $8,490,000 · Health+13 more — $56,603,918 · Health+13 moreTHE SOFI TUCKER FOUNDATION — $25,975,015 · InternationalONE ACRE FUND — $12,513,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $12,008,905 · InternationalCAMFED USA FOUNDATION — $11,116,500 · InternationalPROXIMITY DESIGNS — $10,012,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $6,156,053 · InternationalBRAC USA INC — $6,120,000 · InternationalHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL — $6,102,600 · InternationalWATERORG — $6,051,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $5,077,962 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $5,057,195 · InternationalWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE — $5,000,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $3,977,237 · International+1 more — $3,575,689 · InternationalBAY AREA RESCUE MISSION — $40,345,600 · Human ServicesTHE ARK — $20,036,500 · Human ServicesYOUTHBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,308,652 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $6,546,857 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $6,442,518 · Human ServicesAUTISM PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION — $5,755,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON — $4,646,852 · Human ServicesZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES — $4,535,000 · Human ServicesLA COSECHA COMMUNITY SUPPORTED AGRICULTURE — $4,395,000 · Human Services
Education$816,131,973Philanthropy$335,794,417Other$552,531,761Community Improvement$276,899,224Health$227,903,399International$118,743,656Human Services$103,011,979

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $246,817,809 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetHEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $123,170,051 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $72,829,102 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSTANFORD BUSINESS SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $60,885,250 over 8y, 26% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $58,682,632 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $50,508,092 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $45,421,604 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBAY AREA RESCUE MISSION — $40,345,600 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetPermanent Archive Fund — $40,000,000 over 1y, 78% of budgetArchive Sustaining Foundation — $40,000,000 over 1y, 99% of budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $35,696,779 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $35,495,483 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $30,856,604 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $26,035,774 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SOFI TUCKER FOUNDATION — $25,975,015 over 4y, 87% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA — $25,827,500 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetRURAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $22,540,000 over 8y, 36% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $21,924,438 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $21,664,809 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $21,394,475 over 5y, 24% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $21,129,550 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $21,049,864 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAURORA HUMANITARIAN INITIATIVE FOUNDATION INC — $20,200,000 over 3y, 73% of budgetTHE ARK — $20,036,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSOME INC — $19,755,082 over 7y, 18% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $19,129,271 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $18,298,024 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $18,275,905 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetUniversity of Nevada Reno Foundation — $18,131,000 over 5y, 34% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $17,997,405 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $15,615,165 over 6y, 7.6% of budgetMARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $14,914,579 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetYale University — $14,206,126 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $13,926,805 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATION — $13,788,854 over 7y, 26% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $13,718,558 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD — $13,267,371 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSUMMIT ACADEMY INC — $13,170,000 over 6y, 46% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $13,147,681 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $13,018,747 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetONE ACRE FUND — $12,513,500 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetNorthwestern University — $12,310,915 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $12,008,905 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC — $11,847,478 over 7y, 8.5% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $11,696,055 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCICERO RESEARCH — $11,133,300 over 4y, 39% of budgetCAMFED USA FOUNDATION — $11,116,500 over 6y, 24% of budgetBUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION — $10,398,000 over 3y, 12% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds STANFORD BUSINESS SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Permanent Archive Fund ↗
  • Who funds Archive Sustaining Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SOFI TUCKER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds RURAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Open Library of Richmond Inc ↗
  • Who funds AURORA HUMANITARIAN INITIATIVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARK ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Nevada Reno Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds AIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

David & Cathy Habib F…Penner Family Foundat…Tomlinson Family Foun…Elkind Family Foundat…Ash Family FoundationThe Foster FoundationGreene Van Arsdale Fo…Raman Family Foundati…Harman Family Foundat…The Edward E Ford Fou…Herman & Faye Sarkows…The Strandberg Family…
David & Cathy Habib FoundationWA21.7× affinity30 shared granteesties to 3 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: David & Cathy Habib Foundation · Penner Family Foundation Inc · Tomlinson Family Foundation · Elkind Family Foundation · Ash Family Foundation · The Foster Foundation · Greene Van Arsdale Foundation co KKR Accounting Services LLC · Raman Family Foundation · Harman Family Foundation · The Edward E Ford Foundation Xxxxx2009 · Herman & Faye Sarkowsky Charitable Foundation · The Strandberg Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • Oregon Justice Resource Center — 26% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
  • Archbold Expeditions Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation — 7% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
  • Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
  • Transhealth Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Hebrew Home of Greater Washington Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc?

Find your warmest path to Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home