Skip to content

Colorado · Nonprofit

Telluride Mountain Club

Telluride Mountain Club (Colorado) receives grants from 50 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,660,025 to it, the largest being MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC ($922,500). 34 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 65% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$864k
Funders on record
50
Grants received
$2.7M
Net assets
$1.8M
34/50 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Telluride Mountain Club does

Mission

TMtC serves as a community catalyst for sustainable outdoor recreation opportunities. We envision a thriving, diverse outdoor community made possible through collaboration, education, responsive action and equitable access.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Trails planning; trails scouting; trails maintenance; trails construction and implementation. Telluride Mountain Club works independently, with the USFS, with town and county governments, with other nonprofits, and with for-profit businesses to preserve and enhance outdoor recreation opportunities in the Telluride region. The club also helps educate users on proper trail etiquette.

    $309,827 spentof which $47,087 as grants$702,816 earned by the program
    96% of program spending
  2. The Peter Inglis Avalanche Education Fund (PI Avy Fund) provides avalanche education scholarships to local community members in an effort to increase avalanche awareness and backcountry safety by decreasing the financial burden of taking an avalanche course.

    $12,976 spent$19,955 earned by the program
    4% of program spending
  3. Telluride Via Ferrata Stewardship. Help coordinate the Via Ferrata Sustainability Fund to help preserve and protect Tellurides unique Via Ferrata route and keep it free and open to the public. Work with the USFS on necessary programming for them to adopt the route into the USFS inventory.

    $921 spent$20,560 earned by the program
    0% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $323,724.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($98k) Expenses 100 ($74k) Net assets 100 ($94k)2019 Revenue 146 ($143k) Expenses 84 ($62k) Net assets 187 ($175k)2020 Revenue 117 ($115k) Expenses 107 ($79k) Net assets 226 ($212k)2021 Revenue 548 ($536k) Expenses 394 ($290k) Net assets 489 ($458k)2022 Revenue 364 ($356k) Expenses 314 ($232k) Net assets 622 ($583k)2023 Revenue 550 ($538k) Expenses 190 ($140k) Net assets 1047 ($981k)2024 Revenue 1023 ($1.0M) Expenses 617 ($454k) Net assets 1631 ($1.5M)2025 Revenue 882 ($864k) Expenses 745 ($549k) Net assets 1967 ($1.8M)
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (882)Expenses (745)Net assets (1967)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $981k to $1.5M (+56%).

$94k
$175k
$212k
$458k
$583k
$981k
$1.5M
$2.0M
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2023 5% · 2024 24% · 2025 4%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

91% of Telluride Mountain Club’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (18% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 16,206 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$24k
’18
$81k
’19
$36k
’20
$246k
’21
$125k
’22
$398k
’23
$547k
’24
$315k
’25
40
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

20212022202320242025
Listed77668
Joined·+0+1+2+3
No longer listed·0221
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 25 funders, grant income rose $2k → $403k.

10 of 50 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 65% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $62k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Telluride Foundation). These are real filings, and they are not money Telluride Mountain Club raised.

From the IRS filings of Telluride Mountain Club’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 50 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Telluride Mountain Club has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 35% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

66% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Telluride Mountain Club.

35%
largest funder
54%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 54% · 2018 89% · 2019 38% · 2020 38% · 2021 85% · 2022 25% · 2023 28% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

56% of Telluride Mountain Club's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 68% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

65% of Telluride Mountain Club's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $936k that is directly attributable, 90% of it comes from funders outside Colorado, across 16 states.

MT
IL
NY
OH
NJ
CA
CO
KY
MD
DE
AZ
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Colorado out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.7M arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Telluride Mountain Club runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 11,010 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.

Operating margin36% · top quartile
Months of reserve40.1mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)36% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,010 recreation & sports nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like Telluride Mountain Club

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Colorado

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

59% of spending goes to programs.

Program 59%Management 21%Fundraising 20%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Telluride Mountain Club: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Telluride Mountain Club?
Telluride Mountain Club (Colorado) receives grants from 50 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,660,025 to it, the largest being MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC ($922,500). 34 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 65% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Telluride Mountain Club have?
IRS filings report 50 organizations giving $2,660,025 in grants to Telluride Mountain Club, 34 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Telluride Mountain Club?
MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC is the largest funder on record, with $922,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Telluride Mountain Club find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Telluride Mountain Club →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 50 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing