Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Herman & Faye Sarkowsky Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$505k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$333k
Largest
01What you fund
0172% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202024.

Arts & Culture$3.8MHuman Services$1.3MPhilanthropy$493kReligion$51kEducation$23kAnimals$10kHealth$6kCommunity Improvement$2kEmployment$2kOther$2.3M
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $101k
  • $250k+1 grant · $333k
$17,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$275k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEATTLE ART MUSEUM$332,685
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE SEATTLE$50,539
SEATTLE ART MUSEUM$50,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SEATTLE$25,000
ARTS FUND$17,000
SEATTLE REP THEATRE$15,000
TEENTIX$5,000
KAVANA COOPERATIVE$5,000
THE 5TH AVENUE THEATER$5,000
TEMPLE DE HIRSCH SINAI$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE SEATTLE: $1.2M → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT: $35k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE SEATTLE: $51k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.9M · 21 repeat orgs$812k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
22

Total granted

$6.9M
$797k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+28%

Still filing today

67%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationEmploymentReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
    4× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +97%
  • PS
    PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM
    2× · 2020–2021 · $787k · revenue +23%
  • WS
    WASHINGTON STATE JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $255k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • SC
    SEATTLE COLLEGES
    one grant, 2022 · $203k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue -47%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $153k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Coalition for Immigrant Justice Northwest

The jewish coalition builds a jewish voice in the pacific northwest advancing immigrant justice and domestic policy, following the leadership of impacted community.

Human Services
2
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
3
Community Credit Lab

To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.

Human Services
4
King County Sexual Assault Resource Center

KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…

5
Seattle Jobs Initiative

Seattle jobs initiative (sji) creates opportunities for people to support themselves and their families through living-wage careers.

Employment
6
Seattle Architectural Foundation

The Seattle Architecture Foundation connects people to the architecture, design, and history of Seattle. We believe the more you engage with design, the more you feel connected to your changing city. As a volunteer driven organization, we…

Arts & Culture
7
Friends of Kexp

Kexp's mission is to enrich your life by championing music and discovery.

Youth Development
8
Neighborhood Farmers Market Alliance

Neighborhood farmers market alliance's mission is to strengthen and support washington's small farms and farming families by providing effective direct sales sites and broadening access to seattle shoppers.

Community Improvement
9
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
10
Jewish Mothers of Metropolitan Seattle
Religion
11
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services
12
Northwest Film Forum

Northwest Film Forum incites public dialogue and creative action through collective cinematic experiences. A nonprofit film and arts center located in Seattle, Northwest Film Forum presents hundreds of films, festivals, community events,…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Harvest Emm and the most unlike its peers is Teentix. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPerforming Arts EducationCommunity Foundations and G…Healthcare and Support Serv…Coachella Valley Community …Educational and Community F…Community Health and Advoca…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr15%3%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr18%27%20–35yr11%30%35–55yr12%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr18%2%20–35yr11%20%35–55yr12%77%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
15%
3,141/20,723

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
25/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SEATTLE ART MUSEUM — $2,757,106 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE ART MUSEUMPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM — $787,388 · Arts & CulturePALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM+5 more — $246,300 · Arts & Culture+5 moreTEMPLE DE HIRSCH SINAI — $994,104 · OtherTEMPLE DE HIRSCH SINAITHE 5TH AVENUE THEATER — $477,291 · OtherTHE 5TH AVENUE THEATERWASHINGTON STATE JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIE — $255,000 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE JEWISH HISTORIC…SEATTLE COLLEGES — $202,837 · OtherSEATTLE COLLEGESIndividual grant recipient — $152,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+25 more — $197,912 · Other+25 moreJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $1,302,015 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERV…+1 more — $35,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SEATTLE — $280,622 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY — $200,083 · Philanthropy+2 more — $12,500 · PhilanthropyKAVANA THE KAVANA COOPERATIVE — $50,915 · ReligionCollege Success Foundation — $12,500 · EducationTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF WASHINGTON — $10,000 · EducationSECOND CHANCE RANCH — $10,000 · Animals
Arts & Culture$3,790,794Other$2,279,744Human Services$1,337,015Philanthropy$493,205Religion$50,915Education$22,500Animals$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSEATTLE ART MUSEUM — $2,757,106 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $1,302,015 over 4y, 9.0% of budgetPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM — $787,388 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SEATTLE — $280,622 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIE — $255,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY — $200,083 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSEATTLE REPERTORY THEATRE — $85,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetARTSFUND — $81,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetKAVANA THE KAVANA COOPERATIVE — $50,915 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetCONNECTICUT PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT — $35,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTEENTIX — $30,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetHolocaust Center For Humanity — $21,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCollege Success Foundation — $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON WOMEN'S FOUNDATION — $12,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF WASHINGTON — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSECOND CHANCE RANCH — $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetNORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPIKE PLACE MARKET FOUNDATION — $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFARESTART — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE — $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE FAMILY FUND — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJVS SOCAL — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER LIFELINE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD JUSTICE PROJECT — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIC ONE FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEATTLE ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
  • Who funds PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SEATTLE
  • Who funds WASHINGTON STATE JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIE
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY
  • Who funds SEATTLE REPERTORY THEATRE
  • Who funds ARTSFUND
  • Who funds KAVANA THE KAVANA COOPERATIVE
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT
  • Who funds TEENTIX
  • Who funds Holocaust Center For Humanity
  • Who funds College Success Foundation
  • Who funds WASHINGTON WOMEN'S FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF WASHINGTON
  • Who funds SECOND CHANCE RANCH
  • Who funds NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS
  • Who funds PIKE PLACE MARKET FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM
  • Who funds FARESTART
  • Who funds FOOD LIFELINE
  • Who funds ONE FAMILY FUND
  • Who funds JVS SOCAL
  • Who funds CANCER LIFELINE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA29.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle · United Way of King County · Loeb Charitable Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Pruzan Foundation · Alhadeff Family Charitable Foundation · Feinberg Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · American Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Herman & Faye Sarkowsky Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Herman & Faye Sarkowsky Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Herman & Faye Sarkowsky Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph