Skip to content

North Dakota · Nonprofit

COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER

COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER (North Dakota) receives grants from 37 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,836,574 to it, the largest being MARGARET A CARGILL FOUNDATION ($3,600,000). 21 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$5.6M
Funders on record
37
Grants received
$8.8M
Net assets
$9.6M
21/37 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 25%
01What it does

What Community Violence Intervention Center does

Mission

Preventing violence. Promoting safety. Building hope. With a bold mission to end interpersonal violence in two generations, our nationally recognized agency delivers vital safety and healing services to adults and children experiencing trauma and educates youth and professionals about how to prevent violence and develop healthy relationships.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Safety services every person deserves to live a life free of violence.1) crisis services: 996 adults were supported through times of crisis, including 840 victims of domestic violence and 156 victims of sexual assault. Advocates on the crisis line answered 385 calls and advocates assisted clients in obtaining 17 orders for protection. 98% of clients reported feeling safer and more aware of ways to plan for safety as a result of cvic services. Bre (name and some details changed) found out about cvic through our expanded rural outreach program she received a letter about cvic's services following an incident where she called local law enforcement for help after experiencing abuse. Bre met with our rural advocate at a safe location in her community. Cvic's advocate helped bre obtain a domestic violence protection order and safety plan. The advocate helped bre find local transportation support to be able to get to medical appointments, provided a referral to therapy services, and helped bre apply for benefits. Later, after cvic was notified that a partner wanted to donate an electric oven range, the rural advocate immediately thought of bre. Her oven had been damaged by her abuser,…

    $3,496,242 spentof which $316,623 as grants$199,428 earned by the program
    68% of program spending
  2. Healing services specialized support heals the impact of trauma so individuals can thrive. 1) youth therapy: 162 children impacted by violence received therapy to address trauma. 117 parents received education about parenting needs of children living in violent homes and the effects of violence/trauma on children. 2) adult therapy: 109 adults received therapy services, including 101 adults who received individual therapy, 5 in restorative therapy, and 15 adults who participated in support group sessions. 91% of adult clients surveyed showed improvement in emotional condition. One client reported, "therapy is hard but worth it. Currently I am learning to silence the old abusive voices and find kindness for myself within myself."

    $1,022,982 spentof which $30,437 as grants$207,072 earned by the program
    20% of program spending
  3. Education/prevention services because violence is predictable, it is also preventable. 1. Youth education: cvic reached 8,855 youth through 880 presentations and 79% of youth surveyed planned to use what they learned in their daily lives. Earlier this year, cvic created and began implementing a new curriculum on healthy relationships - t.a.c.o (teaching about caring for others). During a presentation with first graders, students were very excited about the program mascot and asked if they could name him. The class together decided to name him (or her) taco man or taco rita. Every lesson after kids asked about the mascot. "is taco man kind to his friends?" students asked for instance. Students shared that they wanted to be just like taco man and have continued to talk about and share ideas of how the mascot is a good friend even outside of lessons. 2) adult presentations: cvic reached 7,122 adults through 114 presentations; 93% indicated that they planned to use what they learned. Cvic trained 1,361 professional through 48 presentations; 97% indicated they plan to use the information learned from training.

    $617,198 spent$102,522 earned by the program
    12% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $5,136,422.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($6.9M) Expenses 100 ($3.9M) Net assets 100 ($7.9M)2018 Revenue 59 ($4.1M) Expenses 106 ($4.2M) Net assets 97 ($7.7M)2019 Revenue 79 ($5.4M) Expenses 120 ($4.7M) Net assets 108 ($8.5M)2020 Revenue 69 ($4.8M) Expenses 125 ($4.9M) Net assets 107 ($8.5M)2021 Revenue 87 ($6.0M) Expenses 135 ($5.3M) Net assets 117 ($9.2M)2022 Revenue 92 ($6.4M) Expenses 140 ($5.5M) Net assets 124 ($9.8M)2023 Revenue 98 ($6.7M) Expenses 157 ($6.2M) Net assets 133 ($11M)2024 Revenue 100 ($6.9M) Expenses 171 ($6.8M) Net assets 136 ($11M)2025 Revenue 82 ($5.6M) Expenses 175 ($6.9M) Net assets 121 ($9.6M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (82)Expenses (175)Net assets (121)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $12M to $11M (−11%).

$8.5M
$8.7M
$9.2M
$9.7M
$10M
$10M
$12M
$12M
$11M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 32% · 2018 50% · 2019 39% · 2020 51% · 2021 54% · 2022 56% · 2023 39% · 2024 50% · 2025 57%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

81% of COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,814 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$3.0M
’17
−$94k
’18
$705k
’19
−$151k
’20
$670k
’21
$869k
’22
$578k
’23
$143k
’24
−$1.3M
’25
1.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Coiya Tompkins Inman

President/CEO

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2018 and FY2019, and between the FY2022 and FY2023 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed141615181614171819
Joined·+3+2+7+2+0+4+4+3
No longer listed·13442132
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 8 funders to 17 funders, grant income rose $389k → $859k.

14 of 37 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 20% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $409k from 2 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Altru Health System). These are real filings, and they are not money COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER raised.

From the IRS filings of COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 37 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 41% of grant income and the top three 75%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

41%
largest funder
75%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 64% · 2018 95% · 2019 43% · 2020 51% · 2021 41% · 2022 39% · 2023 58% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

47% of COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 57% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER draws 96% of its grant income from funders outside North Dakota, across 7 states in all.

ND
MN
NY
NV
CO
MO
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
North Dakota out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.8M arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER's funding base is broadening — from 8 funders to 17 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−22% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve1.7mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−3% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,349 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $9.2M on record.

Federal$9.2M
grants $9.2Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Justice$9.0M
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development$186k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In North Dakota

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

74% of spending goes to programs.

Program 74%Management 20%Fundraising 6%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

82%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MN

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER?
COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER (North Dakota) receives grants from 37 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,836,574 to it, the largest being MARGARET A CARGILL FOUNDATION ($3,600,000). 21 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER have?
IRS filings report 37 organizations giving $8,836,574 in grants to COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER, 21 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER?
MARGARET A CARGILL FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $3,600,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in North Dakota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Community Violence Intervention Center →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 37 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing