· Private foundation
The Foster Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k49 grants · $600k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $683k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $750,000 |
| SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $260,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $160,000 |
| OVERLAKE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $135,000 |
| SEATTLE FOUNDATION | $127,792 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON - FOSTER SCHOOL BUILDING | $100,000 |
| NORTHWEST HARVEST | $60,000 |
| FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER | $50,000 |
| SEATTLE ART MUSEUM | $50,000 |
| PAWS- PROGRESSIVE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY | $47,500 |
| MAKE-A-WISH | $35,000 |
| OVERLAKE SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON - TOUGHER TOGETHER | $22,500 |
| SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $20,000 |
| YOUTHCARE | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $455k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
68 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TOTHE OVERLAKE SCHOOL5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +89%
- STST THOMAS SCHOOL3× · 2020–2022 · $700k · revenue +13%
SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $600k · revenue +234%
Funded once
- OHOVERLAKE HOSPITALone grant, 2022 · $50k
- MPMADDIE'S PLACEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +236%
- PSPASADO'S SAFE HAVENgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +84%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.
Restoring hope, building futures, and strengthening our communities through programs with youth, young adults and families. we support the behavioral health of at-risk and in-crisis youth across the greater south king county area. we take…
To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.
To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.
Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.
KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…
To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.
We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.
Advance health and social justice for all members of our community.
Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
Support people with disabilities and low incomes to realize their purpose, potential and strength.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Providence Hospice of Seattle Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Conservation International Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE OVERLAKE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ST THOMAS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
- Who funds Outdoors for all Foundation ↗
- Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗
- Who funds The Big Table ↗
- Who funds RYTHER ↗
- Who funds LOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Downtown Emergency Service Center ↗
- Who funds KINDERING CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS ↗
- Who funds MARY'S PLACE SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds TILTH ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds FARESTART ↗
- Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
- Who funds AMARA ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST CENTER ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOPELINK ↗
- Who funds Boyer Children's Clinic ↗
- Who funds COMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Youth Eastside Services ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORCARE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE HOSPICE OF SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · United Way of King County · The Norcliffe Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Grousemont Foundation · Employees Community Fund of Boeing-Puget Sound · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Medina Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Elizabeth a Lynn Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Foster Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Foster Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Foster Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.