Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Greene Van Arsdale Foundation co KKR Accounting Services LLC

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$494k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$252k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$6.9MHealth$1.3MHuman Services$1.1MRecreation & Sports$713kPhilanthropy$601kEnvironment$199kArts & Culture$62kCommunity Improvement$50kCrime & Legal$25kOther$5.4M
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $252k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$42M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Oakland Lacrosse Club$252,161
UCSF$150,000
CuriOdyssey$25,000
Saint Michael and All Angels Episcopal$20,000
Kuki'o Ho'omana Fund$20,000
Queen's North Hawaii Community Hospital$10,000
US Lacrosse$10,000
University of Pennsylvania$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Oakland Lacrosse Club: $252k → 10%GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $250k → 7%Oakland Lacrosse Club: $250k → 10%GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $250k → 7%Good Tidings Foundation: $100k → 7%GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%OAKLAND LACROSSE CLUB: $5k → 10%OAKLAND LACROSSE CLUB: $5k → 10%OAKLAND LACROSSE CLUB: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
IL
NY
MA
WY
IA
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
KS
DC
HI
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 25% of Greene Van Arsdale Foundation co KKR Accounting Services LLC’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Greene Van Arsdale Foundation co KKR Accounting Services LLClessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 35 repeat orgs$781k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

35 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
47

Total granted

$12M
$761k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+24%

Still filing today

69%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsArts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE
    4× · 2017–2021 · $3.0M · revenue +52%
  • TC
    THE CAREY SCHOOL
    2× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +45%
  • MH
    MILLS-PENINSULA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • CD
    CAMP DUDLEY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue -58%
  • US
    United States Ski Team Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $123k · revenue +88%
  • LP
    LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
4
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
5
Ucsf Health Medical Foundation

See schedule othe mission of ucsf health medical foundation is threefold: 1) to establish, operate and maintain medical clinics for the provision of healthcare services in california; 2) to promote health by providing, coordinating,…

Health
6
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
7
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
8
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
9
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
10
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
11
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
12
The University Foundation At Sacramento State

Raise private resources to advance the mission and priorities of the university and serve as ambassadors in the community. provide stewardship in the prudent investment of resources and ensure the integrity of the foundation through…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Pacific Medical Center Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Gene Spotlight Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Policy Research and AdvocacyCancer Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsAffordable Housing Developm…Health Access Advocacy and …Christian Youth Camps
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%62%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/65
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,500

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/59
Grantees still filing
43/59
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $3,664,963 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIATHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $3,050,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE+5 more — $161,000 · EducationUNITED WAY OF THE BAY AREA COMMUNITY FUND — $1,809,571 · OtherUNITED WAY OF THE BAY AREA COMMUNITY F…THE CAREY SCHOOL — $1,100,002 · OtherTHE CAREY SCHOOLSACRED HEART SCHOOLS ATHERTON — $1,010,640 · OtherSACRED HEART SCHOOLS ATHERTONIndividual grant recipient — $400,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBUFFALO SEMINARY ANNUAL FUND — $310,010 · OtherBUFFALO SEMINARY ANNUAL FUNDUCSF — $290,334 · Other+44 more — $627,400 · Other+44 moreMILLS-PENINSULA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $1,001,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $100,000 · HealthTHE ORPHAN DISEASE PATHWAY PROJECT — $75,000 · Health+7 more — $84,000 · HealthGOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION — $601,400 · Human ServicesOakland Lacrosse Club — $517,161 · Human Services+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION — $300,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP DUDLEY FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 · Recreation & SportsUnited States Ski Team Foundation — $123,000 · Recreation & SportsUS LACROSSE FOUNDATION INC — $105,000 · Recreation & Sports+4 more — $34,500 · Recreation & SportsREDF — $500,000 · PhilanthropyKUKIO HOOMANA FUND — $40,000 · PhilanthropyGENE SPOTLIGHT INC — $25,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $36,000 · PhilanthropyPollinator Partnership — $125,000 · EnvironmentPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST — $55,000 · EnvironmentHILLSBOROUGH BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDATION — $10,500 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $8,525 · Environment
Education$6,875,963Other$5,547,957Health$1,260,000Human Services$1,128,561Recreation & Sports$712,500Philanthropy$601,000Environment$199,025

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $3,664,963 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $3,050,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CAREY SCHOOL — $1,100,002 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetMILLS-PENINSULA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $1,001,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetGOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION — $601,400 over 4y, 18% of budgetOakland Lacrosse Club — $517,161 over 5y, 20% of budgetREDF — $500,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP DUDLEY FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCAMP DUDLEY INC — $125,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPollinator Partnership — $125,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetUnited States Ski Team Foundation — $123,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUS LACROSSE FOUNDATION INC — $105,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ORPHAN DISEASE PATHWAY PROJECT — $75,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST — $55,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPRESERVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS — $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HELIX SCHOOL — $45,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetQUEEN'S NORTH HAWAII COMMUNITY HOSPITAL — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKUKIO HOOMANA FUND — $40,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCURIODYSSEY — $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLIFEMOVES — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPROTECT OUR DEFENDERS FOUNDATION % RUSSELL H MILLER — $25,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetGENE SPOTLIGHT INC — $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetPublic Health Institute — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHILLSBOROUGH SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUS LACROSSE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON GOOD — $15,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $13,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSPORTS HUMANITARIAN GROUP INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHILLSBOROUGH BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDATION — $10,500 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetSan Mateo County Health Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAY AREA DISCOVERY MUSEUM — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMON GOOD FORUM INC — $10,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetTHE EXPLORATORIUM — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $8,525 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FIRST TEE — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA TROUT INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…The San Francisco Fou…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Robert and Dana Emery…Marin Community Found…Jewish Community Fede…Morgan Stanley Global…Lindsay & Alex Ramsay…Hoefer Family Foundat…The Ayco Charitable F…Wendell Family Founda…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA31× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Robert and Dana Emery Family Foundation Rockefeller Trust Company · Marin Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Lindsay & Alex Ramsay Foundation · Hoefer Family Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Wendell Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Greene Van Arsdale Foundation co KKR Accounting Services LLC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Greene Van Arsdale Foundation co KKR Accounting Services LLC?

Find your warmest path to Greene Van Arsdale Foundation co KKR Accounting Services LLC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines