Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Community foundation

The Dallas Foundation

Dallas foundation brings together people, ideas and investments in greater dallas so individuals and families can reach their full potential.

$91M
Granted FY2024still arriving
788
Grants FY2024still arriving
43
States reached
$7.9M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$177MHealth$64MPhilanthropy$42MReligion$34MHuman Services$32MArts & Culture$22MAnimals$21MRecreation & Sports$20MOther$0
02FY2024 · 788 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 788 grants below total $87,254,672 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $90,645,841 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,391,169 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k115 grants · $775k
  • $10k–50k407 grants · $8.5M
  • $50k–250k223 grants · $23M
  • $250k+43 grants · $55M
$25,000
Median grant
43
States reached
$492M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND$7,850,330
NASPA$6,078,441
SOUTHERN GATEWAY PUBLIC GREEN FOUNDATION$5,636,745
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$3,257,250
TRINITY PARK CONSERVANCY$3,162,983
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$3,000,000
SAINT MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS CHURCH$2,627,198
DALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION$2,625,000
NEW VENTURE FUND$2,045,400
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY$1,614,510
PRAXIS HOUSING INITIATIVES INC$1,200,000
OURCALLING INC$1,077,600
MOMENTOUS INSTITUTE$1,016,000
PLANO ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$1,010,000
ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF DALLAS$950,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $27.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HEROES AND HORSES: $200k → 10%ARMS OF HOPE: $360k → 12%ARMS OF HOPE: $300k → 12%ARMS OF HOPE: $300k → 12%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $600k → 14%VARIETY THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF TEXAS: $210k → 10%SHADOW WARRIORS PROJECT: $388k → 9%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $471k → 10%INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $383k → 14%OURCALLING INC: $1.1M → 14%CITYSQUARE: $542k → 14%OURCALLING INC: $215k → 14%OURCALLING INC: $182k → 14%THE CONCILIO: $354k → 14%THE CONCILIO: $341k → 14%THE CONCILIO: $338k → 14%THE CONCILIO: $306k → 14%THE CONCILIO: $260k → 14%METROCREST SERVICES INC: $479k → 14%METROCREST SERVICES INC: $430k → 14%WOVEN HEALTH CLINIC: $370k → 14%WOVEN HEALTH CLINIC: $355k → 14%BACHMAN LAKE TOGETHER FAMILY CENTER: $484k → 14%WOVEN HEALTH CLINIC: $321k → 14%BACHMAN LAKE TOGETHER FAMILY CENTER: $208k → 14%METROCREST SERVICES INC: $320k → 14%METROCREST SERVICES INC: $303k → 14%WOVEN HEALTH CLINIC: $300k → 14%WOVEN HEALTH CLINIC: $250k → 14%METROCREST SERVICES INC: $176k → 14%METRO DALLAS HOMELESS ALLIANCE: $335k → 14%MOMMIES IN NEED: $260k → 14%LITERACY ACHIEVES: $237k → 14%BEHIND EVERY DOOR: $210k → 14%JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $194k → 14%MEN OF NEHEMIAH INC: $280k → 14%ASSIST THE OFFICER FOUNDATION: $200k → 14%WOMEN IN NEED OF GENEROUS SUPPORT: $506k → 14%WOMEN IN NEED OF GENEROUS SUPPORT: $253k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $241k → 14%HOUSING FORWARD: $175k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER (DCAC): $1.1M → 14%FOR OAK CLIFF: $1.6M → 14%FOR OAK CLIFF: $900k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE INC: $1.1M → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE INC: $194k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $191k → 14%GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER: $406k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$413M · 1033 repeat orgs$52M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

1033 repeat relationships — 583 still active in FY2024, 450 since wound down; 163 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1033
736

Total granted

$413M
$45M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+20%

Still filing today

78%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STUDENT PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATORS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $16M · revenue +33%
  • TP
    Trinity Park Conservancy
    4× · 2020–2024 · $11M · revenue +405%
  • SN
    SPAY NEUTER NETWORK
    7× · 2017–2023 · $7.9M · revenue +58% · 48% of their budget

Funded once

  • HM
    HOBBS MUNICIPAL SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2021 · $5.0M
  • OC
    ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $4.0M · revenue -55% · 44% of their budget
  • IP
    IDEA Public Schoolsgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2.5M · revenue +78%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Episcopal Foundation of Dallas

The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.

Religion
2
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
3
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
4
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
5
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
6
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
7
Trellis Foundation

We believe every texas student deserves the opportunity to earn a postsecondary credential or degree that helps them achieve the future they envision for themselves and their families. we invest in the programs, practices, and policies…

Human Services
8
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
9
The Association of Former Students of Texas a&M University

To strengthen the association of former students, promote the interests and welfare of texas a&m university, perpetuate ties of affection and esteem formed in university or college days, and serve the student body.

Education
10
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
11
Forty First Foundation

The forty first foundation supports and advances the university of texas at austin in its pursuit of excellence. we work closely with the office of the president to identify, fund, and implement strategic initiatives that enhance the…

Education
12
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Public Policy Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Swan Strings. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Youth Sports ProgramsCommunity College Foundatio…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Lgbtq+ Community SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsSchool District FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Domestic Violence ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Pregnancy Support ServicesChristian Youth CampsEquine Therapy ProgramsCancer Support ServicesYouth Mentoring ProgramsSchool Parent OrganizationsCommunity Food PantriesUnited Way AffiliatesAddiction Recovery ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Faith-Based Social ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Ymca Youth DevelopmentCommunity Arts CentersOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community FoundationsYouth Development ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportSenior Support ServicesPublic Library OperationsYouth Development CentersDevelopmental Disabilities …Immigrant Worker SupportJewish Community Organizati…Dance Arts OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Local History MuseumsElementary Literacy TutoringHealth Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Animal Rescue and Shelter
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%5%<5yr16%9%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr10%23%35–55yr13%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%2%<5yr16%7%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr10%29%35–55yr13%22%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%36/2,145
the rest of the field
15%
20,211/134,659

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

1603 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1603 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

110
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
341
Early backer (in before they grew)
1535/1603
Grantees still filing
1070/1603
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STUDENT PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATORS INC — $16,362,677 · EducationNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STUDENT PERSO…TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $12,383,066 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INCEDUCATIONAL FIRST STEPS — $11,308,575 · EducationEDUCATIONAL FIRST STEPSLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $5,470,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist University — $5,174,768 · EducationBONTON ENTERPRISES — $4,474,296 · EducationYOUNG WOMEN'S PREPARATORY NETWORK — $4,155,567 · Education+49 more — $61,579,843 · Education+49 moreTexas Women's Foundation — $13,781,959 · OtherTexas Women's FoundationUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS — $6,357,549 · OtherUTMD ANDERSON — $5,732,360 · OtherHOBBS MUNICIPAL SCHOOLS — $5,000,000 · OtherSAINT MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS CHURCH — $4,772,233 · OtherDALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $5,668,750 · Other+75 more — $87,495,090 · Other+75 moreTrinity Park Conservancy — $11,306,644 · Community ImprovementSOUTHERN GATEWAY PUBLIC GREEN FOUNDATION — $5,656,745 · Community ImprovementDOWNTOWN DALLAS PARKS CONSERVANCY — $5,553,669 · Community ImprovementCircuit Trail Conservancy — $3,191,647 · Community ImprovementCITYBUILD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,673,135 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $1,154,320 · Community Improvement+1 more — $513,211 · Community ImprovementPARKLAND FOUNDATION — $4,037,530 · HealthBaylor Health Care System Foundation — $3,878,845 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $3,284,777 · HealthWEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE — $2,267,446 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC — $1,628,951 · HealthUT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS — $1,609,070 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $1,539,572 · HealthTHE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC — $1,090,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM OF TEXAS — $937,175 · Health+8 more — $4,966,226 · HealthFOR OAK CLIFF — $2,632,738 · Human ServicesTHE CONCILIO — $1,820,050 · Human ServicesThe Family Place — $1,817,392 · Human ServicesMETROCREST SERVICES — $1,718,251 · Human ServicesON EAGLES WINGS INC AKA WOVEN HEALTH CLINIC — $1,595,700 · Human ServicesOURCALLING INC — $1,567,200 · Human ServicesDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $1,558,345 · Human ServicesCITYSQUARE — $1,104,481 · Human ServicesBACHMAN LAKE TOGETHER — $1,095,856 · Human ServicesVARIETY THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF TEXAS — $1,055,000 · Human ServicesVICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER — $1,011,505 · Human ServicesARMS OF HOPE — $1,000,528 · Human ServicesASCEND DALLAS — $985,401 · Human ServicesMARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC — $920,742 · Human Services+8 more — $5,009,783 · Human ServicesPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC — $7,850,330 · PhilanthropyDALLAS SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS — $1,903,456 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $1,754,350 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $1,602,829 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $1,117,930 · PhilanthropyNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $1,081,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $1,015,778 · PhilanthropyAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $983,684 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR BRAIN HEALTH ADVANCES — $887,261 · Philanthropy+5 more — $2,966,682 · PhilanthropySPCA of Texas — $8,899,549 · AnimalsSPAY NEUTER NETWORK — $7,909,225 · AnimalsDALLAS ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $1,781,482 · Animals
Education$120,908,792Other$128,807,941Community Improvement$29,049,371Health$25,239,592Human Services$24,892,972Philanthropy$21,163,300Animals$18,590,256

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STUDENT PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATORS INC — $16,362,677 over 5y, 22% of budgetTexas Women's Foundation — $13,781,959 over 8y, 8.3% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $12,383,066 over 8y, 10% of budgetEDUCATIONAL FIRST STEPS — $11,308,575 over 8y, 65% of budgetTrinity Park Conservancy — $11,306,644 over 4y, 18% of budgetSPCA of Texas — $8,899,549 over 8y, 10% of budgetSPAY NEUTER NETWORK — $7,909,225 over 7y, 48% of budgetPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC — $7,850,330 over 1y, 11% of budgetDALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $5,668,750 over 8y, 39% of budgetSOUTHERN GATEWAY PUBLIC GREEN FOUNDATION — $5,656,745 over 2y, 23% of budgetDOWNTOWN DALLAS PARKS CONSERVANCY — $5,553,669 over 7y, 16% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $5,470,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSouthern Methodist University — $5,174,768 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBONTON ENTERPRISES — $4,474,296 over 5y, 31% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S PREPARATORY NETWORK — $4,155,567 over 7y, 66% of budgetPARKLAND FOUNDATION — $4,037,530 over 7y, 12% of budgetODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $4,000,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetCRISTO REY DALLAS HIGH SCHOOL INC — $3,996,335 over 7y, 32% of budgetBaylor Health Care System Foundation — $3,878,845 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $3,742,014 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTEXAS TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $3,680,820 over 6y, 80% of budgetCOMMIT2DALLAS — $3,640,393 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetDallas Museum of Art — $3,452,123 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $3,299,858 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $3,284,777 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetCircuit Trail Conservancy — $3,191,647 over 5y, 63% of budgetMomentous Institute — $3,077,500 over 8y, 7.5% of budgetBIG THOUGHT — $3,025,888 over 8y, 7.5% of budgetST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER — $2,774,285 over 7y, 8.6% of budgetFOR OAK CLIFF — $2,632,738 over 5y, 53% of budgetCHILD POVERTY ACTION LAB — $2,533,144 over 8y, 18% of budgetIDEA Public Schools — $2,500,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE — $2,267,446 over 2y, 32% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $2,145,400 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDALLAS THEATER CENTER — $2,118,449 over 8y, 10% of budgetUPLIFT EDUCATION — $2,026,808 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTexas 2036 — $1,999,101 over 7y, 23% of budgetNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC — $1,992,186 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetDALLAS SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS — $1,903,456 over 8y, 19% of budgetNORTH TEXAS ALLIANCE TO REDUCE UNINTENDED PREGNANCY IN TEENS — $1,822,807 over 3y, 15% of budgetTHE CONCILIO — $1,820,050 over 8y, 17% of budgetThe Family Place — $1,817,392 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetDALLAS ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $1,781,482 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $1,779,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $1,754,350 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetDALLAS AFTERSCHOOL — $1,731,278 over 8y, 26% of budgetMETROCREST SERVICES — $1,718,251 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetCITYBUILD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,673,135 over 5y, 70% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STUDENT PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATORS INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas Women's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL FIRST STEPS ↗
  • Who funds Trinity Park Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds SPCA of Texas ↗
  • Who funds SPAY NEUTER NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN GATEWAY PUBLIC GREEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN DALLAS PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds BONTON ENTERPRISES ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S PREPARATORY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds PARKLAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY DALLAS HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Baylor Health Care System Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMIT2DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Museum of Art ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Circuit Trail Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds Momentous Institute ↗
  • Who funds BIG THOUGHT ↗
  • Who funds ST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOR OAK CLIFF ↗
  • Who funds CHILD POVERTY ACTION LAB ↗
  • Who funds IDEA Public Schools ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS THEATER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UPLIFT EDUCATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

W P & Bulah Luse Foun…Hillcrest FoundationTexas Women's Foundat…United Way of Metropo…Hoblitzelle FoundationThe Rees-Jones Founda…The Addy FoundationThe Perot FoundationKatherine C Carmody C…Meadows Foundation IncThe Eugene McDermott …Theodore and Beulah B…
W P & Bulah Luse FoundationTX184.4× affinity140 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Hoblitzelle Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · The Addy Foundation · The Perot Foundation · Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw · Meadows Foundation Inc · The Eugene McDermott Foundation · Theodore and Beulah Beasley Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Dallas Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Orange Bowl Committee Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
44report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines