· Private foundation
Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k72 grants · $1.5M
- $50k–250k15 grants · $1.0M
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NAVARRO COUNTY AMBULATORY CARE ASSN | $250,000 |
| VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS | $150,000 |
| JAMES L COLLINS CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $140,000 |
| RETINA FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTHWEEST | $75,000 |
| SPCA OF TEXAS | $75,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR THE CALLIER CENTER | $75,000 |
| BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| WEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| FRONTIERS OF FLIGHT MUSEUM INC | $50,000 |
| DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER | $50,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC | $50,000 |
| HOUSING FORWARD | $50,000 |
| CAFE MOMENTUM | $50,000 |
| COMPASSION CORSICANA | $50,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF NAVARRO COUNTY TEXAS | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $660k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 73 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CICORSICANA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2025 · $90k · revenue +12%
- FOFRONTIERS OF FLIGHT MUSEUM INC2× · 2023–2025 · $65k · revenue +37%
- WDWEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL2× · 2023–2025 · $65k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- NCNAVARRO COLLEGEone grant, 2024 · $250k
- NCNAVARRO COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTERone grant, 2024 · $75k
- CMCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
To engage and educate communities to prevent sexual violence and to support survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.
To unify services across Dallas County, to empower youth, strengthen families and build safe, healthy communities.
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.
The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.
The mission of Dallas Services is to enable individuals with disabilities and other special needs to achieve their potential by fostering community inclusiveness and independence.
Downtown Dallas, Inc. Foundation is the charitable arm of Downtown Dallas, Inc. whose purpose is to help make the area in and around Downtown Dallas a more vibrant and livable place for both daytime and permanent residents by promoting the…
The mission of Dallas County Family Resource Center is to provide programs to improve the quality of resources and well-being of the children and families in the community by intake, assessment, and referral of those in need to available…
The dcms foundation's mission is to improve the quality and distribution of health services throughout dallas county.
The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Children's Advocacy Center and the most unlike its peers is Ennis Public Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
123 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 123 of the 162 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NAVARRO COUNTY AMBULATORY CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds CORSICANA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SPCA of Texas ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RETINA FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTHWEST ↗
- Who funds FRONTIERS OF FLIGHT MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds WEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Goodwill Industries of Dallas Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NAVARRO COUNTY TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds Baylor Health Care System Foundation ↗
- Who funds HOUSING FORWARD ↗
- Who funds HEALING HANDS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds PARKLAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KERENS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CAFE MOMENTUM ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds DALLAS CASA ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds The Family Place ↗
- Who funds DALLAS EVICTION ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds MY POSSIBILITIES ↗
- Who funds FAIR PARK FIRST ↗
- Who funds BONTON ENTERPRISES ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hillcrest Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · Hoblitzelle Foundation · The Moody Foundation · The Addy Foundation · Theodore and Beulah Beasley Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.