Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES

PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES (Texas) receives grants from 131 organizations whose IRS filings report $16,806,845 to it, the largest being James A & Leta Chapman TESTAM TR 486006AC3 ($4,953,503). 90 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$28M
Funders on record
131
Grants received
$17M
Net assets
$181M
90/131 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%
01What it does

What Presbyterian Children's Homes & Services does

Mission

Presbyterian children's homes and services provides a variety of christ-centered care and support to children and families in need.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Foster care: pchas provides both foster care services and foster care case management services in texas and missouri. The foster care program in texas is structured to provide therapeutic services that help children who experience social and emotional difficulties, developmental delays, learning and behavioral challenges. The program is not appropriate for children whose needs are so intense they require regular 24-hour awake supervision. The foster care case management program in missouri supports case managers as they build a nurturing professional team to embrace the family, work through emotional issues and help children and their families create the most appropriate plan for a permanent home.

    $10,349,658 spent$9,997,332 earned by the program
    49% of program spending
  2. Community services: pchas provides a variety of social services to the various communities in texas, louisiana and missouri. Child and family programs help clients address issues before a crisis results in out-of-home placement of children. Other services include mentoring, family focused therapy, crisis care programs and educational support to children and families.

    $6,826,439 spent$2,193,524 earned by the program
    33% of program spending
  3. Single parent family program: provides services and support to single parents who are facing homelessness due to poverty, abuse, divorce, incarceration, abandonment, violence, or another crisis. Families in this program live in transitional residential homes in texas and misssouri.

    $2,149,338 spent$5,463 earned by the program
    10% of program spending
  4. Residential services: pchas provides residential treatment and transitional living services in missouri. Residential treatment services provide family focused therapy and intentsive treatment to clients. Transitional living programs are licensed by the state of missouri to provide housing, educational, employment and other services to children as they transition to young adults.

    $1,379,866 spent$1,145,458 earned by the program
    7% of program spending
  5. Advanced and student education program: provides support to and funding for former clients who are interested in pursuing higher education, vocational, technical, or job training beyond a high school education.

    $295,781 spentof which $21,929 as grants
    1% of program spending

The 5 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $21,001,082.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($17M) Expenses 100 ($16M) Net assets 100 ($153M)2018 Revenue 187 ($31M) Expenses 155 ($25M) Net assets 97 ($148M)2019 Revenue 126 ($21M) Expenses 152 ($25M) Net assets 107 ($165M)2020 Revenue 126 ($21M) Expenses 145 ($24M) Net assets 113 ($174M)2021 Revenue 179 ($30M) Expenses 153 ($25M) Net assets 123 ($189M)2022 Revenue 133 ($22M) Expenses 153 ($25M) Net assets 102 ($157M)2023 Revenue 164 ($27M) Expenses 154 ($25M) Net assets 111 ($171M)2024 Revenue 171 ($28M) Expenses 160 ($26M) Net assets 118 ($181M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (171)Expenses (160)Net assets (118)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $192M to $160M (−17%).

$154M
$152M
$168M
$181M
$192M
$160M
$175M
$185M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2019 0% · 2020 2% · 2021 13% · 2022 2% · 2023 2% · 2024 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

25% of PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (21% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,405 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$304k
’17
$5.8M
’18
−$3.9M
’19
−$2.8M
’20
$4.7M
’21
−$2.9M
’22
$2.2M
’23
$2.4M
’24
4.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Gloria L Lewis

Chair of board

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed2427262730323233
Joined·+13+0+2+8+3+6+8
No longer listed·10115167
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 26 funders to 63 funders, grant income rose $1.5M → $2.4M.

24 of 131 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 28% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 131 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 29% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

63% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES.

29%
largest funder
53%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 72% · 2018 22% · 2019 58% · 2020 40% · 2021 42% · 2022 40% · 2023 36% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

55% of PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 69% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES draws 54% of its grant income from funders outside Texas, across 17 states in all.

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
WY
CT
RI
MO
KY
VA
KS
AR
OK
LA
AL
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $4.7M arriving through sponsors registered in 13 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 3,289 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin8% · top quartile
Months of reserve4.7mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)8% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,289 human services nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024

Organizations like PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 10%Fundraising 9%

Governance

18
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

58%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Missouri Alliance for Children & Families LLC · partnership

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES?
PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES (Texas) receives grants from 131 organizations whose IRS filings report $16,806,845 to it, the largest being James A & Leta Chapman TESTAM TR 486006AC3 ($4,953,503). 90 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES have?
IRS filings report 131 organizations giving $16,806,845 in grants to PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES, 90 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES?
James A & Leta Chapman TESTAM TR 486006AC3 is the largest funder on record, with $4,953,503 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Presbyterian Children's Homes & Services →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 131 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing