Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

N of One

N of One (Texas) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,173,645 to it, the largest being KOPPELMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION ($655,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$95k
Funders on record
12
Grants received
$1.2M
Net assets
$754k
9/12 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What N of One does

Mission

N of One aims to create breakthroughs in autism by focusing on emerging areas such as the microbiome, immune system, and mitochondrial cell metabolism. We take a venture capital appproach by supporting both innovative academic researchers as well as start-ups pursuing novel, transformative approaches.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. N of One directly funds research and actively works with researchers at top institutions to create breakthroughs for autism by focusing on historically underfunded areas such as the immune system, the microbiome, and cell metabolism or combinations thereof. N of One has projects underway in each of these three core areas. N of One is continuously identifying new, high-potential research projects that can lead to novel treatment, diagnostic, and prevention strategies in our lifetime. Additionally N of One seeks to invest in and support commercialization of promising breakthroughs to help them to market faster.

    $185,669 spentof which $185,669 as grants
    99% of program spending
  2. N of One believes that an integral part of its mission is to communicate the latest promising scientific developments to the public. N of One disseminates information via its website, social media, and its periodic newsletter to subscribers including its monthly Research Round Up highlighting and summarizing recent important research for its subscribers. N of One works with the media and press to help support the publication of the latest scientific breakthroughs to as wide an audience as possible.

    $2,693 spent
    1% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $188,362.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($241k) Expenses 100 ($39k) Net assets 100 ($295k)2018 Revenue 132 ($319k) Expenses 495 ($193k) Net assets 143 ($421k)2019 Revenue 100 ($241k) Expenses 501 ($195k) Net assets 158 ($466k)2020 Revenue 66 ($160k) Expenses 189 ($74k) Net assets 187 ($552k)2021 Revenue 67 ($160k) Expenses 224 ($87k) Net assets 212 ($625k)2022 Revenue 70 ($168k) Expenses 136 ($53k) Net assets 251 ($739k)2023 Revenue 55 ($132k) Expenses 502 ($196k) Net assets 231 ($681k)2024 Revenue 39 ($95k) Expenses 65 ($25k) Net assets 256 ($754k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (39)Expenses (65)Net assets (256)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $295k to $421k (+43%).

$295k
$421k
$466k
$552k
$625k
$740k
$681k
$755k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

71% of N of One’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,214 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$202k
’17
$126k
’18
$45k
’19
$86k
’20
$73k
’21
$115k
’22
−$64k
’23
$70k
’24
228
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

John Rodakis

President/Chairman

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed44444444
Joined·+0+0+0+0+0+0+0
No longer listed·0000000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 5 funders, grant income fell $135k → $77k.

6 of 12 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 36% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of N of One’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

N of One leans on a few funders — its largest provides 56% of grant income and the top three 86%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

37% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund N of One.

56%
largest funder
86%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 74% · 2018 79% · 2019 71% · 2020 47% · 2021 57% · 2022 53% · 2023 39% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

43% of N of One's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 75% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

N of One draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Texas, across 6 states in all.

MN
NY
MA
PA
NJ
DE

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $428k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

N of One runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 9,898 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin73% · top quartile
Months of reserve227.8mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−12% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,898 health nonprofits under $100k, FY2024

Organizations like N of One

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 13%Fundraising 5%

Governance

4
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

50%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for N of One: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds N of One?
N of One (Texas) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,173,645 to it, the largest being KOPPELMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION ($655,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does N of One have?
IRS filings report 12 organizations giving $1,173,645 in grants to N of One, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of N of One?
KOPPELMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $655,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like N of One find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 12 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing