How much did Texas Women's Foundation grant in FY2025?

Texas Women's Foundation reported 62 grants totaling $3,256,051 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is Texas Women's Foundation based?

Texas Women's Foundation is based in TX.

Texas Women's Foundation

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

Texas Women's Foundation

Texas Women's Foundation envisions a strong vibrant Texas for all in which women share equally in opportunities for economic advancement to support themselves, their families, and their futures.

$3.3M

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$1.0M

Largest

01What you fund

0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2025.

Education$7.0MHuman Services$5.2MHealth$4.5MArts & Culture$2.8MPhilanthropy$1.8MYouth Development$1.3MCommunity Improvement$1.2MHousing & Shelter$1.1MCivil Rights$731kOther$11M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

menprogamorganizingeodchurchespathbuilding power

2020

clinicteamschronicairjustice systembreak cyclesbehavioral

2021

covid reliefintegrating collectioncollection assetsgun violencesteamincorporating collectionsmall

2022

teen pregnancyotherwisefacilitatesneeley businessliving alsnurse partnershipcrisis away

2023

concilioneighborhoodsincarcerationheartsfulltimereproductive healthtxwf daf

2025

pregnant parentingrepresentationfinancial advisingremainingcontact amyenrichingntgd

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 62 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k8 grants · $49k
$10k–50k41 grants · $1.1M
$50k–250k12 grants · $979k
$250k+1 grant · $1.0M

$31,000

Median grant

States reached

$26M

Total assets

Largest grants

Documentary Arts Inc$1,000,000
Ignite$122,481
Avance Inc$100,000
Delighted to Doula Birth Services$100,000
Center for Transforming Lives$100,000
TCU Development$100,000
Texas Health Resources Foundation$79,689
Truth Pregnancy Resource Center$76,778
Dallas Eviction Advocacy Center Inc$75,000
Healthy Futures of Texas$65,000
Young Invincibles$60,000
Texas Appleseed$50,000
Ciudad Nueva Community Outreach Inc$50,000
Children's Advocacy Center for North Texas Inc$42,000
Abide Womens Health Services$42,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $4.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 68% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$27M · 188 repeat orgs$9.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.

188 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 145 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

188

204

Total granted

$27M

$8.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%

+43%

Still filing today

93%

87%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $709k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

DA
DALLAS AFTERSCHOOL NETWORK
5× · 2019–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +84%
UT
UNITED TO LEARN
4× · 2019–2022 · $869k · revenue +558%
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas
6× · 2019–2025 · $638k · revenue +15%

Funded once

DC
DALLAS COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH & MENTAL RETARDATION CENTER (DBA METROCARE SERV
one grant, 2021 · $1.0M
KT
KIPP TEXAS INC (DALLAS-FORT WORTH)
one grant, 2020 · $500k
UO
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON
one grant, 2021 · $325k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services

Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights

Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

To be Texas' foremost champion of individual rights & freedoms through education & litigation.

Civil Rights

Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education

The Women's Resource of Greater Houston

Help women and girls become financially stable.

Philanthropy

Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development

American Civil Liberties Union

To champion individual rights under a charter granted by the ACLU (National Affiliate).

—

Goodwill Industries of Dallas Inc

Goodwill Industries of Dallas, Inc. is a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help people with barriers to employment build skills, find jobs and reach their goals in life so that they can reach their full potential and experience…

Employment

Houston Area Women's Center

To help those affected by domestic and sexual violence to move their lives forward.

Human Services

Groundwork Dfw

Groundwork DFW's vision is to increase access to opportunity through data-driven community engagement. By applying the powerful combination of data analytics and grassroots outreach tactics, we strategically reach neighborhoods like no one…

Education

TrueWorks Houston

To see well-formed people create well-formed ventures and transform our city.

Religion

Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

To advocate the interest and enhance the viability of hospitals in dallas, fort worth, and north texas and to strengthen the relationship of hospitals to the communities they serve

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Transforming Lives and the most unlike its peers is Knox College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.5%2/411

the rest of the field

13%

17,175/136,393

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

385 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

116

Early backer (in before they grew)

368/385

Grantees still filing

295/385

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$13,805,071Education$6,996,490Human Services$5,151,060Health$4,524,217Arts & Culture$2,775,206Philanthropy$1,838,024Youth Development$1,255,490

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Metropolitan Dallas IncTX233× affinity146 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Moody Foundation · Meadows Foundation Inc · The Addy Foundation · Capital for Kids · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Texas Women's Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: 29 PIECES.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~12 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 342038797 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on 29 PIECES, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 57% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Texas Women's Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Texas Women's Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Texas Women's Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

385 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Texas Women's Foundation?

More from the funding graph

Texas Women's Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

385 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Texas Women's Foundation?

More from the funding graph