· Private foundation
Hillcrest Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k21 grants · $562k
- $50k–250k56 grants · $4.8M
- $250k+7 grants · $2.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PARKLAND FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| DALLAS METHODIST HOSPITALS FOUNDATION INC | $500,000 |
| DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY | $400,000 |
| ST PHILIP'S SCHOOL & COMMUNITY CENTER | $250,000 |
| CITYSCAPE SCHOOLS INC | $250,000 |
| NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK | $250,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS | $200,000 |
| GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF DALLAS INC | $200,000 |
| PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE AND SCIENCE | $200,000 |
| ROCKWALL COUNTY HELPING HANDS | $150,000 |
| DALLAS AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC | $150,000 |
| MY POSSIBILITIES | $150,000 |
| HEALING HANDS MINISTRIES INC | $150,000 |
| FOOD FOUNDATION DBA HUNGER BUSTERS | $150,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $6.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
150 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2025, 103 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CMCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION3× · 2021–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +4%
- NTNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK5× · 2020–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +35%
- PFPARKLAND FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +30%
Funded once
- TSTWELFTH STEP MINISTRY INCone grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue +8%
- YOYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INCone grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +2%
- TPTrinity Park Conservancygraduatedone grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue +504%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…
To unify services across Dallas County, to empower youth, strengthen families and build safe, healthy communities.
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.
Downtown Dallas, Inc. Foundation is the charitable arm of Downtown Dallas, Inc. whose purpose is to help make the area in and around Downtown Dallas a more vibrant and livable place for both daytime and permanent residents by promoting the…
Dallas Christian is a college preparatory school committed to Biblical values where students are prepared for Christ-centered lives of purpose, service and leadership.
The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.
Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.
The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.
The dcms foundation's mission is to improve the quality and distribution of health services throughout dallas county.
To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.
To engage and educate communities to prevent sexual violence and to support survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family and Child Guidance Center and the most unlike its peers is Mckinney Roots Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
277 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 277 of the 354 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds PARKLAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST TRANSPLANT ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Texas Health Resources Foundation ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds Irving Healthcare Foundation ↗
- Who funds UPLIFT EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds TWELFTH STEP MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds FAIR PARK FIRST ↗
- Who funds Trinity Park Conservancy ↗
- Who funds Dallas Methodist Hospitals Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MY POSSIBILITIES ↗
- Who funds Baylor Health Care System Foundation ↗
- Who funds DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds GASTON CHRISTIAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds CITYSCAPE SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds ST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE CALLIER CENTER AND COMMUNICATION DISORDERS ↗
- Who funds VOGEL ALCOVE ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum ↗
- Who funds WIPE OUT KIDS' CANCER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR AMERICAN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR INTEGRATIVE COUNSELING AND PSYCHOLOGY ↗
- Who funds SHARING LIFE COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds Mane Gait ↗
- Who funds Carter BloodCare ↗
- Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Moody Foundation · The Addy Foundation · The Perot Foundation · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hillcrest Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hillcrest Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hillcrest Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.