Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

Rockefeller philanthropy advisors aims to accelerate philanthropy in pursuit of a just world

$460M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1,153
Grants FY2024still arriving
50
States reached
$9.2M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Environment$314MCivil Rights$192MPhilanthropy$147MEducation$129MArts & Culture$122MCrime & Legal$73MHealth$72MCommunity Improvement$69MOther$0
02FY2024 · 1153 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1,153 grants below total $275,005,959 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $460,159,317 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $185,153,358 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k34 grants · $243k
  • $10k–50k336 grants · $6.4M
  • $50k–250k478 grants · $56M
  • $250k+305 grants · $213M
$100,000
Median grant
50
States reached
$891M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INVEST IN OUR LAND LLC$9,205,000
OMEGA INSTITUTE$6,500,000
WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE$4,321,172
GIRLS EDUCATIONAL AND MENTORING SERVICES$3,200,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$3,127,275
SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION$3,077,737
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY$3,029,046
GLOBAL ALLIANCE FOR INCINERATOR ALTERNATIVES$2,837,300
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INC$2,705,000
RARE$2,457,499
COUNCIL FOR WATERSHED HEALTH$2,229,241
RADIO MILWAUKEE INC$2,184,095
CLIMATE ARC INC$2,107,530
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$2,080,242
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND INC$2,000,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $80.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIVING IN FREEDOM TOGETHER-LIFT: $750k → 11%THE NEW SUN RISING: $473k → 11%The Village of Arts and Humanities: $500k → 22%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $400k → 12%MONSOON ASIANS & PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN SOLIDARITY: $600k → 10%Ekvnv Yefolecvlke: $425k → 21%EMPOWER HER NETWORK INC: $450k → 9%STATE POWER FUND: $650k → 12%ELLA BAKER INSTITUTE INC: $757k → 20%MONSOON ASIANS & PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN SOLIDARITY: $506k → 10%FAMILY VALUES WORK A MULTI-STATE CONSORTIUM: $1.2M → 17%SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE: $400k → 13%Teen Health Mississippi: $400k → 23%EL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS: $400k → 14%LIFEBUILDERS: $750k → 21%BOLD FUTURES NM: $400k → 14%REPOWER FUND: $565k → 11%TOGETHER WISCONSIN: $750k → 17%BLACK LEADERS AGAINST SEX TRAFFICKING: $600k → 15%FREEDOM INC: $765k → 10%WISDOM PROJECTS INC: $710k → 19%Tides Center: $10.3M → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCATES OF TEXAS: $400k → 10%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $850k → 10%POSSIBILITY LABS: $605k → 10%HEART WOMEN & GIRLS: $495k → 14%CASA MYRNA VASQUEZ INC: $450k → 16%MATRICULATE: $450k → 20%WOMEN'S COMMUNITY JUSTICE ASSOCIATION INC: $800k → 20%ANNIECANNONS INC: $450k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER - CARECEN - OF CALIFORNIA: $650k → 14%OPPORTUNITY AMERICA EDUCATIONAL FUND: $448k → 14%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $420k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $9.2M → 10%CLIMATE BREAKTHROUGH INC: $1.3M → 10%Tides Center: $6.8M → 10%TIDES CENTER: $2.4M → 10%TIDES CENTER: $2.1M → 10%ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT: $500k → 17%Opportunity Institute: $1.0M → 10%CLIMATE BREAKTHROUGH INC: $7.8M → 10%MORE IN COMMON INC: $650k → 17%New York Women's Foundation: $600k → 17%MORE IN COMMON INC: $405k → 17%NY POLICE AND FIRE WIDOWS' & CHILDREN'S BENEFITFUND: $834k → 17%DETENTION WATCH NETWORK: $445k → 14%GLOBAL RESILIENT CITIES NETWORK: $1.0M → 17%FREEDOM NETWORK USA INC: $443k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $165M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions, $165M to organizations and $253k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$69M · 42% · 212 grants · 4 people

Stated purpose: ARTS, CULTURE & HUMANITIES, CIVIL RIGHTS, SOCIAL ACTION & ADVOCACY · ENVIRONMENT · ENVIRONMENT, YOUTH DEVELOPMENT

Sub-Saharan Africa$34M · 20% · 153 grants · 16 people

Stated purpose: ANIMAL-RELATED, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT & CAPACITY BUILDING, ENVIRONMENT · ENVIRONMENT · CIVIL RIGHTS, SOCIAL ACTION & ADVOCACY, ENVIRONMENT

East Asia and the Pacific$19M · 11% · 72 grants · 1 person

Stated purpose: ENVIRONMENT · ENVIRONMENT, YOUTH DEVELOPMENT, PUBLIC & SOCIETAL BENEFIT · ENVIRONMENT, YOUTH DEVELOPMENT

South America$19M · 11% · 100 grants

Stated purpose: ENVIRONMENT · CIVIL RIGHTS, SOCIAL ACTION & ADVOCACY, ENVIRONMENT · INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS

North America (Canada and Mexico)$11M · 7% · 52 grants · 2 people

Stated purpose: CIVIL RIGHTS, SOCIAL ACTION & ADVOCACY · AGRICULTURE & FOOD, ENVIRONMENT · CRIME & LEGAL-RELATED, EDUCATION

Russia and Neighboring States$4.4M · 3% · 17 grants

Stated purpose: CIVIL RIGHTS, SOCIAL ACTION & ADVOCACY · INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS · PUBLIC & SOCIETAL BENEFIT, INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS

South Asia$4.0M · 2% · 16 grants

Stated purpose: ENVIRONMENT, AGRICULTURE & FOOD · ENVIRONMENT, YOUTH DEVELOPMENT · ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC & SOCIETAL BENEFIT

Middle East and North Africa$2.5M · 2% · 21 grants · 2 people

Stated purpose: ARTS, CULTURE & HUMANITIES, EDUCATION, ENVIRONMENT · ENVIRONMENT, YOUTH DEVELOPMENT, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT & CAPACITY BUILDING · COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT & CAPACITY BUILDING, HUMAN SERVICES, HOUSING & SHELTER

Central America and the Caribbean$2.3M · 1% · 13 grants

Stated purpose: ENVIRONMENT, YOUTH DEVELOPMENT · ENVIRONMENT, YOUTH DEVELOPMENT, ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC & SOCIETAL BENEFIT · CIVIL RIGHTS, SOCIAL ACTION & ADVOCACY

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$943M · 1168 repeat orgs$254M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

1168 repeat relationships — 568 still active in FY2024, 600 since wound down; 228 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1168
531

Total granted

$943M
$170M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+11%

Still filing today

89%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $84M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    Wildlife Conservation Society
    8× · 2017–2024 · $21M · revenue +59%
  • GA
    Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives
    8× · 2017–2024 · $20M · revenue +327% · 81% of their budget
  • SM
    SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $14M · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • CL
    CLIMATE LEAD INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10M · 33% of their budget
  • JA
    JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6.6M · revenue +53%
  • MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $4.6M · revenue +100% · 74% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Witness Inc

Witness helps people use video and technology to protect and defend human rights. the organization operates globally. witness' global team designs solutions, provides guidance, and co-develops strategies that enable human rights defenders…

International
2
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
3
Women Donors Network

Women donors network is a multigenerational, multiracial feminist network that channels collective power and resources in solidarity with movements to protect and advance gender, racial, economic, and climate justice toward our vision of…

Philanthropy
4
Institute for Public Strategies

to work alongside communities to build power, challenge systems of injustice, protect health, and improve quality of life.

Health
5
CarbonPlan

We work collaboratively to build open tools and resources for the evaluation and deployment of robust climate programs. We share analyses through public communication and collaboration with journalists in order to foster effective climate…

Environment
6
United for a Fair Economy Inc

United for a Fair Economy challenges the concentration of wealth and power by using popular economics education, trainings and creative communications to support social movements working for a resilient, sustainable and equitable economy.

Social Science
7
Upturn Inc

Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.

—
8
Gender Equity Policy Institute

Gender Equity Policy Institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization working to advance gender equality in the United States through data-driven research, education and training, and policy development. GEPI is the first U.S.…

Civil Rights
9
Asylee Women Enterprise Inc

Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.

International
10
American Jewish World Service Inc

We work to realize human rights and end poverty in africa, asia, latin america and the caribbean.

International
11
The Nasdaq Entrepreneurial Center Inc

Deliver world-class resources and mentoring to enable every entrepreneur across the globe to realize their maximum potential.

Arts & Culture
12
Immigration Equality

Immigration equality promotes justice and equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and hiv-positive immigrants through direct legal services, policy advocacy, and impact litigation.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Catalyst Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Sailing Hall of Fame & Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Immigrant Worker SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Lgbtq+ Community SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Cancer Support ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Local Food System Organizat…Domestic Violence ServicesFaith-Based Social ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Sports ProgramsYouth Development ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Community Arts CentersSenior Support ServicesAddiction Recovery ServicesPublic Library OperationsAffordable Housing Construc…Community FoundationsSchool Parent OrganizationsUnited Way AffiliatesCommunity Food PantriesYmca Youth DevelopmentElementary Literacy TutoringVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Military Veterans SupportFood Banks and PantriesYouth Mentoring ProgramsYouth Development CentersSchool District FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…Independent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …Pregnancy Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity College Foundatio…Christian Missionary Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Dance Arts OrganizationsLocal History MuseumsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%16%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%5%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%13%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%68/4,004
the rest of the field
13%
240,328/1,815,561

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

1757 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1757 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

307
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
415
Early backer (in before they grew)
1730/1757
Grantees still filing
1102/1757
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW VENTURE FUND — $30,025,805 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUNDGlobal Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives — $20,456,369 · EnvironmentGlobal Alliance for Incinerator…SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION — $14,188,237 · EnvironmentSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATIONWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $12,378,608 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INCCLIMATE LEAD INC — $10,247,809 · EnvironmentSTAND — $8,240,550 · EnvironmentOCEANA INC — $8,145,737 · EnvironmentCLIMATE ARC INC — $7,189,791 · Environment+30 more — $92,590,523 · Environment+30 moreHOPEWELL FUND — $12,757,400 · PhilanthropyHOPEWELL FU…Groundswell Fund — $10,155,249 · PhilanthropyGroundswell…The Pew Charitable Trusts — $6,820,993 · PhilanthropyThe Pew Cha…THE BRIDGE FUND — $5,902,873 · PhilanthropyTHE BRIDGE …APPALACHIAN COMMUNITY FUND — $4,511,320 · PhilanthropyAPPALACHIAN…FEEDBACK LABS — $4,142,937 · PhilanthropyFEEDBACK LA…TIDES FOUNDATION — $3,969,100 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUND…NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $3,667,783 · PhilanthropyMeridian Institute — $3,314,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ILEX FOUNDATION — $2,930,932 · Philanthropy+7 more — $13,095,622 · Philanthropy+7 moreINVEST IN OUR LAND LLC — $9,205,000 · OtherWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE — $8,283,921 · OtherWildlife Conservation Society — $20,554,414 · OtherWildlife Conservation SocietyNEO Philanthropy Inc — $8,475,530 · Other+78 more — $187,159,885 · Other+78 moreNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc — $9,302,595 · Civil RightsNational …EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $4,164,500 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUS…THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $3,865,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTE…AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $3,800,500 · Civil RightsAMERICAN …MICHIGAN CIVIC EDUCATION FUND — $3,750,000 · Civil RightsMICHIGAN …CIVIL RIGHTS CORPS — $3,600,000 · Civil RightsCIVIL RIG…UNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC — $3,200,000 · Civil RightsCOLOR OF CHANGEORG EDUCATION FUND — $3,000,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER — $2,921,500 · Civil RightsTransgender Law Center — $2,817,500 · Civil RightsMICHIGAN VOICES — $2,660,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN WOMEN'S FORUM — $2,640,000 · Civil RightsWORTH RISES INC — $2,325,000 · Civil Rights+9 more — $15,746,170 · Civil Rights+9 moreTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM — $6,932,500 · Arts & CultureTHE STUDI…APOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC — $6,775,000 · Arts & CultureAPOLLO TH…ALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC — $6,610,000 · Arts & CultureALVIN AIL…JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC — $6,600,000 · Arts & CultureJAZZ AT L…MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY — $4,600,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF…BOREALIS PHILANTHROPY — $4,415,000 · Arts & CultureBOREALIS …ART AND ADVOCACY SOCIETY — $3,000,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $2,460,437 · Arts & CultureRACING MAGPIE — $2,245,000 · Arts & CultureRADIO MILWAUKEE INC — $2,184,095 · Arts & Culture+7 more — $12,266,000 · Arts & Culture+7 moreTIDES CENTER — $32,671,829 · Human ServicesCLIMATE BREAKTHROUGH INC — $9,072,968 · Human ServicesSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $2,185,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY VALUES WORK A MULTI-STATE CONSORTIUM — $1,907,000 · Human Services+3 more — $4,620,621 · Human ServicesOMEGA INSTITUTE FOR HOLISTIC STUDIES INC — $6,500,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $5,639,054 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $4,686,525 · EducationEdreports Org Inc — $4,566,749 · EducationPROTEUS FUND INC — $2,991,050 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $2,937,448 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $2,871,544 · EducationKHAN ACADEMY INC — $2,500,000 · EducationNew York University — $2,059,355 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $2,000,000 · EducationLA COMPOST — $1,904,784 · EducationNATIONAL CAUCUS OF ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATORS — $1,846,880 · Education+5 more — $7,772,094 · Education
Environment$203,463,429Philanthropy$71,268,209Other$233,678,750Civil Rights$63,792,765Arts & Culture$58,088,032Human Services$50,457,418Education$48,275,483

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTIDES CENTER — $32,671,829 over 8y, 6.8% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $30,025,805 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society — $20,554,414 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetGlobal Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives — $20,456,369 over 8y, 81% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION — $14,188,237 over 5y, 17% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND — $12,757,400 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $12,378,608 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCLIMATE LEAD INC — $10,247,809 over 1y, 33% of budgetGroundswell Fund — $10,155,249 over 4y, 15% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc — $9,302,595 over 7y, 12% of budgetCLIMATE BREAKTHROUGH INC — $9,072,968 over 2y, 14% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $8,475,530 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE — $8,283,921 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetSTAND — $8,240,550 over 6y, 20% of budgetOCEANA INC — $8,145,737 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetCLIMATE ARC INC — $7,189,791 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM — $6,932,500 over 4y, 43% of budgetThe Pew Charitable Trusts — $6,820,993 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetAPOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC — $6,775,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC — $6,610,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC — $6,600,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetOMEGA INSTITUTE FOR HOLISTIC STUDIES INC — $6,500,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetOil Change International Inc — $6,479,000 over 5y, 48% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER — $6,396,500 over 6y, 7.9% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC — $6,290,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetTHE BRIDGE FUND — $5,902,873 over 7y, 99% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $5,639,054 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRESOURCES LEGACY FUND — $5,345,222 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $5,312,335 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL FISHING WATCH INC — $5,284,053 over 6y, 13% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $4,833,398 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $4,793,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $4,722,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $4,686,525 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $4,660,275 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetMUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY — $4,600,000 over 1y, 74% of budgetEdreports Org Inc — $4,566,749 over 2y, 24% of budgetAPPALACHIAN COMMUNITY FUND — $4,511,320 over 2y, 84% of budgetRARE — $4,500,862 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetBOREALIS PHILANTHROPY — $4,415,000 over 4y, 8.5% of budgetTOGETHER RISING AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNITY — $4,230,047 over 7y, 32% of budgetCENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW INC — $4,164,832 over 8y, 20% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $4,164,500 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetFEEDBACK LABS — $4,142,937 over 5y, 75% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR WATERSHED HEALTH — $4,077,241 over 5y, 51% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $4,032,100 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $3,969,100 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPOLITICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES INC — $3,910,000 over 4y, 70% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE LEAD INC ↗
  • Who funds Groundswell Fund ↗
  • Who funds National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds STAND ↗
  • Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE ARC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM ↗
  • Who funds The Pew Charitable Trusts ↗
  • Who funds APOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OMEGA INSTITUTE FOR HOLISTIC STUDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Oil Change International Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds RESOURCES LEGACY FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FISHING WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds Edreports Org Inc ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN COMMUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds RARE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rockefeller Family Fu…Equation Campaign and…Ms Foundation for Wom…Novo FoundationThe Susan Thompson Bu…Wallace Global Fund IIWellspring Philanthro…Groundswell FundThe Libra FoundationFreedom Together Foun…Foundation to Promote…Windward Fund
Rockefeller Family Fund IncNY86.5× affinity133 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rockefeller Family Fund Inc · Equation Campaign and Global Climate Legal Defense · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · Novo Foundation · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · Wallace Global Fund II · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Groundswell Fund · The Libra Foundation · Freedom Together Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Windward Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution — 63% of income from government
  • Center On Rural Innovation Inc — 37% of income from government
  • Integrated Refugee and Immigrant Services — 37% of income from government
  • Corporation to Develop Communities of Tampa Inc — 37% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Ibis Reproductive Health Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
  • The Center for Effective Philanthropy Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home