Skip to content

Montana · Nonprofit

BRIDGERCARE

BRIDGERCARE (Montana) receives grants from 69 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,118,657 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($1,005,404). 47 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 61% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$9.3M
Funders on record
69
Grants received
$5.1M
Net assets
$7.2M
47/69 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 14%
01What it does

What Bridgercare does

Mission

To provide excellent, affordable reproductive and sexual healthcare and education in a safe, supportive, empowering atmosphere.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Provide funding and support to over 20 title x family planning clinics across montana that provide reproductive and sexual healthcare to over 14,000 low income montanans.

    $2,737,883 spentof which $2,490,355 as grants
    42% of program spending
  2. Provide reproductive, sexual, and mental healthcare to over 4,986 patients with fees based on income and regardless of patient ability to pay.

    $2,570,104 spent$1,890,026 earned by the program
    39% of program spending
  3. Provide medically-accurate, trauma-informed, developmentally appropriate, culturally responsive, and values-neutral educational curriculum about sexual and reproductive health and healthy relationships to over 1,400 youth in montana. An additional 380 youth were taught evidence-based curriculum shown to reduce risky behavior.

    $1,252,224 spent$22,940 earned by the program
    19% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $6,560,211.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.7M) Expenses 100 ($1.6M) Net assets 100 ($3.1M)2018 Revenue 86 ($2.3M) Expenses 116 ($1.9M) Net assets 113 ($3.5M)2019 Revenue 91 ($2.5M) Expenses 128 ($2.1M) Net assets 125 ($3.9M)2020 Revenue 85 ($2.3M) Expenses 139 ($2.3M) Net assets 126 ($3.9M)2021 Revenue 132 ($3.6M) Expenses 163 ($2.7M) Net assets 154 ($4.8M)2022 Revenue 122 ($3.3M) Expenses 187 ($3.1M) Net assets 160 ($5.0M)2023 Revenue 216 ($5.9M) Expenses 365 ($6.0M) Net assets 155 ($4.8M)2024 Revenue 262 ($7.1M) Expenses 381 ($6.3M) Net assets 181 ($5.6M)2025 Revenue 342 ($9.3M) Expenses 461 ($7.6M) Net assets 231 ($7.2M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (342)Expenses (461)Net assets (231)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $5.1M to $7.3M (+41%).

$5.1M
$3.7M
$4.0M
$4.3M
$5.0M
$5.2M
$5.1M
$7.3M
$8.7M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 14% · 2018 15% · 2019 7% · 2020 10% · 2021 12% · 2022 23% · 2023 48% · 2024 37% · 2025 37%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.1M
’17
$422k
’18
$355k
’19
$14k
’20
$904k
’21
$233k
’22
−$144k
’23
$849k
’24
$1.7M
’25
3.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Stephanie Mcdowell

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed101111101215141519
Joined·+3+3+2+2+6+0+8+4
No longer listed·23303170
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 8 funders to 28 funders, grant income rose $67k → $501k.

19 of 69 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 61% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of BRIDGERCARE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 69 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BRIDGERCARE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 20% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

63% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BRIDGERCARE.

20%
largest funder
45%
top three
~11
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 30% · 2018 50% · 2019 25% · 2020 34% · 2021 20% · 2022 17% · 2023 22% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

42% of BRIDGERCARE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 68% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

61% of BRIDGERCARE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $2.0M that is directly attributable, 84% of it comes from funders outside Montana, across 22 states.

WA
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
WY
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
NE
MO
MD
DE
MS
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Montana out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $3.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 13 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding BRIDGERCARE receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $13.5M on record.

Federal$13.5M
grants $13.5Mcontracts $0
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$13.5M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like BRIDGERCARE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Montana

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

87% of spending goes to programs.

Program 87%Management 7%Fundraising 6%

Governance

15
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BRIDGERCARE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BRIDGERCARE?
BRIDGERCARE (Montana) receives grants from 69 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,118,657 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($1,005,404). 47 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 61% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does BRIDGERCARE have?
IRS filings report 69 organizations giving $5,118,657 in grants to BRIDGERCARE, 47 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BRIDGERCARE?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $1,005,404 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BRIDGERCARE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Montana. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 69 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing