Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative

Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative (Washington) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,248,647 to it, the largest being INATAI FOUNDATION ($450,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.1M
Funders on record
25
Grants received
$2.2M
Net assets
$177k
12/25 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative does

Mission

Engaging first responders, tribes, and other stakeholders in eliminating human trafficking through solution-based knowledge and trauma-informed strategies. Empowering survivors to heal and build self-sufficient affirming lives.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. ASAP Grant - (Federal) OVC FY 2023 Services for Victims of Human Trafficking, SSTAR Project Phase 2: Focusing on root causes of vulnerability, recognizing race, gender identity, religion and culture play important roles in combating trafficking. The South Sound Training, Advocacy, and Response (SSTAR) Project by Innovations HTC aims to enhance the quality and accessibility of services for victims of human trafficking (HT). The primary goal is to support victims in achieving greater independence, self-sufficiency, safety, and well-being. SSTAR collaborates with federal, state, and local law enforcement, service providers, human trafficking task forces, and community-based organizations to establish effective partnerships and comprehensive response protocols. These efforts ensure that victims of human trafficking are accurately identified and referred to appropriate support services.

    $358,187 spentof which $319,176 as grants$-39,011 earned by the program
    47% of program spending
  2. OCVA Grant (state) includes: Healing Support Transition Services, Indigenous Survivors of Human Trafficking Wraparound Services Grant, and HST Statewide Coordination - This program provides transition services, wraparound services, training and technical assistance to Tribal communities, government agencies, law enforcement, health care, and social service providers to develop a coordinated community response to trafficking by identifying, protecting, and supporting trafficking survivors appropriately and respectfully.

    $335,511 spentof which $423,326 as grants$87,815 earned by the program
    44% of program spending
  3. Direct Client Emergency Services & Advocacy - Services include the Direct Client Mobile Advocacy and the The Healing Journey Home. The Healing Journey Home offers a supportive and safe transitional living environment dedicated to women survivors of sex trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation. Our comprehensive services include secure housing, case management, and a range of tailored resources designed to empower survivors to rebuild their lives and achieve long-term stability.

    $47,188 spent
    6% of program spending
  4. Inatai Foundation (Community Fund) - General Operating grant for structural development and generalized direct survivor support to survivors of human trafficking. Supports include direct client assistance with mobile advocacy, the Mariposa Project, and the training and tools to provide these services to survivors.

    $23,127 spentof which $155,000 as grants
    3% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $764,013.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($104k) Expenses 100 ($89k) Net assets 100 ($41k)2019 Revenue 216 ($224k) Expenses 193 ($171k) Net assets 229 ($94k)2020 Revenue 390 ($405k) Expenses 228 ($203k) Net assets 726 ($297k)2021 Revenue 690 ($716k) Expenses 370 ($329k) Net assets 0 ($0)2022 Revenue 621 ($645k) Expenses 682 ($606k) Net assets 1707 ($699k)2023 Revenue 650 ($675k) Expenses 1356 ($1.2M) Net assets 716 ($293k)2025 Revenue 1075 ($1.1M) Expenses 1323 ($1.2M) Net assets 433 ($177k)
2018201920202021202220232025
Revenue (1075)Expenses (1323)Net assets (433)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $700k to $299k (−57%).

$42k
$100k
$328k
$0
$700k
$299k
$196k
2018201920202021202220232025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 12% · 2022 33% · 2023 57% · 2025 93%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

97% of Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,814 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$15k
’18
$53k
’19
$202k
’20
$387k
’21
$38k
’22
−$530k
’23
−$61k
’25
0.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Samantha Gilbertson

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

201920202021202220232025
Listed896889
Joined·+1+0+3+0·
No longer listed·0310·
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 8 funders, grant income rose $73k → $535k.

7 of 25 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 50% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 20% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

90% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative.

20%
largest funder
52%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 49% · 2020 46% · 2021 53% · 2022 27% · 2023 56% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

20% of Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 48% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

91% of Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
IL
NY
NJ
CO
DE

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative has grown faster than three-quarters of the 7,349 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−5% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.2mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)40% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,349 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $1.3M on record.

Federal$1.3M
grants $1.3Mcontracts $0
20
23
Top agencies
  • Department of Justice$1.3M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

65% of spending goes to programs.

Program 65%Management 26%Fundraising 9%

Governance

4
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

0%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 8 related entities

  • API Chaya · exempt
  • Inatai Community Fund · exempt
  • Rockefeller Philanthropy Adv · exempt
  • National Christian Found NW · exempt
  • The Bamford Foundation · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative?
Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative (Washington) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,248,647 to it, the largest being INATAI FOUNDATION ($450,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative have?
IRS filings report 25 organizations giving $2,248,647 in grants to Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative, 12 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative?
INATAI FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $450,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Innovations Human Trafficking Collaborative →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 25 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing