Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

NORTHERN CHUMASH TRIBAL COUNCIL

NORTHERN CHUMASH TRIBAL COUNCIL (California) receives grants from 22 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,777,000 to it, the largest being The David and Lucile Packard Foundation ($517,000). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$1.4M
Funders on record
22
Grants received
$2.8M
Net assets
$203k
11/22 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 80%
01What it does

What Northern Chumash Tribal Council does

Mission

NCTCs mission is to offer a foundation for Chumash people to bring our Culture and Heritage back to life, to create dignity with the people, and to educate the public that the Chumash have always been here, we have not gone anywhere, and we will always be here, one continuum. We are Chumash, by our cultural understanding we have lived on the Central Coast of California since time immemorial.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. Marine Sanctuary Designation and Cultural Stewardship:The Northern Chumash Tribal Council (NCTC) achieved a historic milestone in 2024 with the official designation of the Chumash Heritage National Marine Sanctuary by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). This effort culminated more than a decade of advocacy initiated by NCTC in 2013 and built upon generations of community-led stewardship of the Central Coast. The designation became effective in November 2024, establishing a 175-kilometer (approximately 110-mile) marine sanctuary along the Central California coast between San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties. The sanctuary safeguards culturally and biologically significant ocean areas, protecting sacred marine ecosystems and prohibiting new offshore oil and gas drilling, seabed mining, sewage discharges, and ocean dumping.Co-Management and Indigenous Leadership:Following designation, NCTC assumed a recognized co-management and consultative role with NOAA to ensure that Indigenous stewardship principles and traditional ecological knowledge guide all management and planning activities. NCTC continues to represent the interests and voices of Chumash people…

    $1,365,751 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $1,365,751.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($384k) Expenses 100 ($298k) Net assets 100 ($52k)2021 Revenue 125 ($480k) Expenses 140 ($416k) Net assets 224 ($116k)2022 Revenue 244 ($938k) Expenses 275 ($820k) Net assets 454 ($234k)2023 Revenue 267 ($1.0M) Expenses 352 ($1.0M) Net assets 413 ($213k)2024 Revenue 353 ($1.4M) Expenses 459 ($1.4M) Net assets 393 ($203k)
20202021202220232024
Revenue (353)Expenses (459)Net assets (393)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $116k to $250k (+116%).

$53k
$116k
$250k
$230k
$338k
20202021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2023 12% · 2024 94%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

97% of NORTHERN CHUMASH TRIBAL COUNCIL’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (63% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 5,377 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$86k
’20
$64k
’21
$118k
’22
−$21k
’23
−$10k
’24
2.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

20202021202220232024
Listed35555
Joined·+2+0+0+0
No longer listed·0000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2021 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 11 funders, grant income rose $175k → $818k.

7 of 22 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 25% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of NORTHERN CHUMASH TRIBAL COUNCIL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

NORTHERN CHUMASH TRIBAL COUNCIL has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 19% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

35% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund NORTHERN CHUMASH TRIBAL COUNCIL.

19%
largest funder
47%
top three
~10
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 86% · 2022 31% · 2023 24% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

62% of NORTHERN CHUMASH TRIBAL COUNCIL's grant income comes from California funders.

NY
CA
VA
AZ

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $685k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

NORTHERN CHUMASH TRIBAL COUNCIL has grown faster than three-quarters of the 5,127 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−1% · below the median
Months of reserve2.1mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)37% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 5,127 arts & culture nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Government funding NORTHERN CHUMASH TRIBAL COUNCIL receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $55k on record.

Federal$55k
grants $0contracts $55k
Top agencies
  • Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall Foundation$55k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like NORTHERN CHUMASH TRIBAL COUNCIL

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

3
board members
0%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

91%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for NORTHERN CHUMASH TRIBAL COUNCIL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds NORTHERN CHUMASH TRIBAL COUNCIL?
NORTHERN CHUMASH TRIBAL COUNCIL (California) receives grants from 22 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,777,000 to it, the largest being The David and Lucile Packard Foundation ($517,000). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does NORTHERN CHUMASH TRIBAL COUNCIL have?
IRS filings report 22 organizations giving $2,777,000 in grants to NORTHERN CHUMASH TRIBAL COUNCIL, 11 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of NORTHERN CHUMASH TRIBAL COUNCIL?
The David and Lucile Packard Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $517,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like NORTHERN CHUMASH TRIBAL COUNCIL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Northern Chumash Tribal Council →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2020–2024), and the filings of 22 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing