Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

National Women's Health Network

National Women's Health Network (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 136 organizations whose IRS filings report $13,327,778 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($1,915,471). 67 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 55% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2023
$5.4M
Funders on record
136
Grants received
$13M
Net assets
$5.0M
67/136 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 80%
01What it does

What National Women's Health Network does

Mission

Thousands of individual members support the NWHNs focus on long-term goals: establishing health care that meets the needs of diverse women; protecting the health of all women by opposing the over medicalization of womens normal experience, such as menopause and childbirth.

As stated on its FY2023 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Sponsored Projects - NWHN sponsors projects on issues in keeping with our mission. Sponsored project, Plan C, provides on-line information about the safety and accessibility of medical abortions and how to access abortion pills through the mail. The Miscarriage and Abortion Hotline answers thousands of hotline callers questions about miscarriage and abortion. The Appalachian Abortion Support Collective provides unbiased information for people who are seeking abortions or abortion information.

    $3,295,273 spentof which $403,951 as grants
    84% of program spending
  2. Policy, Advocacy and Lobbying - The Network provides education to the general public and legislators on womens health issues and concerns. The Network works with organizations to shape legislative outcomes through education, outreach, policy recommendations and mobilizing grassroots engagement. While the Network does some lobbying the main focus of the Network is on education and policy work.

    $221,410 spentof which $56,000 as grants
    6% of program spending
  3. Communication and Outreach - The Network uses various channels of communication, including email, social media, and press releases, to communicate to their members and the general public on topics affecting womens health, including reproductive health, drugs, medical devices, and access to care that meets the needs of women in all their diversities. The Network uses their podcast in an effort to reach more people and cover a range of experiences, including infertility, breast cancer, and trans health, focusing not just on medical facts, but also giving voice to the lived experiences of the people participating in the podcast episodes.

    $429,447 spent
    11% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $3,946,130.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.4M) Expenses 100 ($1.5M) Net assets 100 ($801k)2019 Revenue 104 ($1.5M) Expenses 108 ($1.6M) Net assets 93 ($747k)2020 Revenue 198 ($2.9M) Expenses 139 ($2.0M) Net assets 196 ($1.6M)2021 Revenue 201 ($2.9M) Expenses 150 ($2.2M) Net assets 286 ($2.3M)2022 Revenue 422 ($6.1M) Expenses 264 ($3.9M) Net assets 563 ($4.5M)2023 Revenue 374 ($5.4M) Expenses 332 ($4.9M) Net assets 629 ($5.0M)
201720192020202120222023
Revenue (374)Expenses (332)Net assets (629)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $2.5M to $5.2M (+110%).

$848k
$893k
$1.8M
$2.5M
$5.2M
$5.9M
201720192020202120222023
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

99% of National Women's Health Network’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (51% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 8,611 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

−$23k
’17
−$74k
’19
$820k
’20
$714k
’21
$2.2M
’22
$531k
’23
11
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Denise M Hyater Lindenmuth

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2023 Form 990.

201720192020202120222023
Listed141219162016
Joined··+7+2+11+4
No longer listed··0578
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 20 funders to 65 funders, grant income rose $632k → $4.3M.

26 of 136 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 55% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of National Women's Health Network’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 136 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

National Women's Health Network has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 14% of grant income, and it takes 7 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 7 funders to its left

66% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund National Women's Health Network.

14%
largest funder
29%
top three
~19
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 25% · 2018 31% · 2019 18% · 2020 23% · 2021 49% · 2022 23% · 2023 19% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

43% of National Women's Health Network's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 49% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

55% of National Women's Health Network's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $5.9M that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 23 states.

ME
NH
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
NJ
CT
RI
CA
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
NC
OK
GA
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $7.4M arriving through sponsors registered in 15 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

National Women's Health Network holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 7,853 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin10% · above the median
Months of reserve11.3mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)25% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,853 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2023

Organizations like National Women's Health Network

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 12%Fundraising 7%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

92%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 35 states

ME
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for National Women's Health Network: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds National Women's Health Network?
National Women's Health Network (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 136 organizations whose IRS filings report $13,327,778 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($1,915,471). 67 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 55% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does National Women's Health Network have?
IRS filings report 136 organizations giving $13,327,778 in grants to National Women's Health Network, 67 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of National Women's Health Network?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $1,915,471 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like National Women's Health Network find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2017–2023), and the filings of 136 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing