Skip to content

Maryland · Nonprofit

FUNDERS FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY

FUNDERS FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY (Maryland) receives grants from 31 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,633,265 to it, the largest being THE SUSAN THOMPSON BUFFETT FOUNDATION ($1,289,198). 23 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$922k
Funders on record
31
Grants received
$6.6M
Net assets
$870k
23/31 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 94%
01What it does

What Funders for Reproductive Equity does

Mission

Funders for Reproductive Equity is a community of grantmakers focused on sexual and reproductive health, rights and justice (srhrj) in the united states and around the world. Their long term vision is to lead philanthropy and transform philanthropic culture to optimize resources for all people's freedom over their sexual and reproductive lives. To this end, the organization: (1) develops and offers srhrj funders tailored programming and meaningful opportunities for learning, relationship building, networking, strategic collaboration and partnership and (2) supports and informs srhrj grantmaking by collecting and providing data and analysis on funding by the organization's foundation members.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. Funders for Reproductive Equity is a community of grantmakers focused on sexual and reproductive health, rights and justice (srhrj) in the united states and around the world. Their long term vision is to lead philanthropy and transform philanthropic culture to optimize resources for all people's freedom over their sexual and reproductive lives. To this end, the organization: (1) develops and offers srhrj funders tailored programming and meaningful opportunities for learning, relationship building, networking, strategic collaboration and partnership and (2) supports and informs srhrj grantmaking by collecting and providing data and analaysis on funding by the organization's foundation members.

    $1,472,115 spent$552,541 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $1,472,115.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.0M) Expenses 100 ($1.1M) Net assets 100 ($452k)2018 Revenue 100 ($1.0M) Expenses 88 ($982k) Net assets 106 ($478k)2019 Revenue 140 ($1.4M) Expenses 93 ($1.0M) Net assets 288 ($1.3M)2020 Revenue 121 ($1.2M) Expenses 99 ($1.1M) Net assets 314 ($1.4M)2021 Revenue 155 ($1.6M) Expenses 101 ($1.1M) Net assets 412 ($1.9M)2022 Revenue 153 ($1.6M) Expenses 106 ($1.2M) Net assets 494 ($2.2M)2023 Revenue 104 ($1.1M) Expenses 126 ($1.4M) Net assets 417 ($1.9M)2024 Revenue 91 ($922k) Expenses 174 ($1.9M) Net assets 192 ($870k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (91)Expenses (174)Net assets (192)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $2.0M to $1.3M (−37%).

$713k
$869k
$1.5M
$1.6M
$2.0M
$2.4M
$2.0M
$1.3M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

39% of FUNDERS FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (83% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 14,932 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$101k
’17
$26k
’18
$378k
’19
$116k
’20
$443k
’21
$373k
’22
−$349k
’23
−$1.0M
’24
6.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Rocio Cordoba

Executive director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2018 and FY2019 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1113141313141317
Joined·+3+4+4+0+2+4+6
No longer listed·1350152
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 6 funders to 16 funders, grant income rose $441k → $568k.

8 of 31 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 14% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of FUNDERS FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 31 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

FUNDERS FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 19% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

19%
largest funder
50%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 57% · 2018 30% · 2019 20% · 2020 24% · 2021 34% · 2022 36% · 2023 21% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

59% of FUNDERS FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 74% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

FUNDERS FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Maryland, across 10 states in all.

WA
IL
WI
NY
NJ
CA
NE
MD
DC
OK

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Maryland out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $907k arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

FUNDERS FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY's funding base is broadening — from 6 funders to 16 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−110% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve6.3mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,769 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like FUNDERS FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Maryland

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

76% of spending goes to programs.

Program 76%Management 19%Fundraising 5%

Governance

14
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

35%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MD

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for FUNDERS FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds FUNDERS FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY?
FUNDERS FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY (Maryland) receives grants from 31 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,633,265 to it, the largest being THE SUSAN THOMPSON BUFFETT FOUNDATION ($1,289,198). 23 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does FUNDERS FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY have?
IRS filings report 31 organizations giving $6,633,265 in grants to FUNDERS FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY, 23 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of FUNDERS FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY?
THE SUSAN THOMPSON BUFFETT FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,289,198 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like FUNDERS FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Maryland. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Funders for Reproductive Equity →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 31 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing