Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

CONSERVATION X LABS INC

CONSERVATION X LABS INC (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 31 organizations whose IRS filings report $28,817,188 to it, the largest being GORDON E AND BETTY I MOORE FOUNDATION ($13,829,482). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$9.1M
Funders on record
31
Grants received
$29M
Net assets
$4.3M
10/31 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 92%
01What it does

What Conservation X Labs Inc does

Mission

To improve the efficacy, speed, cost, sustainability, and scaling of conservation solutions through harnessing exponential technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship to prevent human-induced extinction.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. In 2024, conservation x labs completed the design and fundraising for the fire grand challenge (https://conservationxlabs.com/fire), after hosting the final two convenings of the participatory design process in indonesia and california. For the rest of the year, the team detailed the implementation plan, continued building a coalition of key partners, expanded fundraising efforts, and participated in other opportunities, such as helping cultural fire practitioners craft policy recommendations for the wildland fire mitigation & management commission. The team then launched the program in august, putting out a call for solutions that can transform local and systemic fire stewardship by bringing together place-based knowledge with cutting-edge technology. Over 90 technology developers and 50 communities applied to participated, and 70 reviewers help select the semi-finalists who then moved on to participate in the challenge's novel matchmaking process. In 2024, conservation x labs launched its alternative proteins program to accelerate innovations that reduce the environmental impact of animal protein production while supporting biodiversity. The program is planning its first big…

    $979,729 spentof which $106,194 as grants
    19% of program spending
  2. Conservation x labs is developing a portable, battery-powered, rapid, and low-cost handheld device called the nabit that detects dna or rna targets in the field without the need for a laboratory, reagents, expensive equipment, or specialized training or expertise. In 2024, we continued developing the nabit device to detect pathogens and invasive species, and began developing additional disease assays for mycobacterium tuberculosis, mpox virus, and swinepox virus, as well as species detection assays for pacific salmon. We completed a design-for-manufacturing overhaul on the nabit device to improve durability, performance, and cost efficiency. Additionally, we initiated development on a new workflow that integrates environmental dna collection from water samples into nabit tests.

    $1,550,953 spentof which $18,175 as grants
    30% of program spending
  3. Sentinel is an ai-powered edge device developed by conservation x labs to transform traditional trail cameras into intelligent, near real-time monitoring tools. Designed for the most remote and challenging environments, sentinel processes images directly on the device using ai and delivers actionable data from anywhere. By reducing false alerts and optimizing data delivery, sentinel enables faster responses to critical events, helping conservationists, land managers, governments, and environmental agencies efficiently manage protected areas and monitor wildlife. More than 400 devices have been successfully deployed across 14 countries, empowering users with scalable, field-ready ai solutions for the hardest conservation challenges.

    $968,505 spentof which $6,000 as grants
    19% of program spending
  4. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $1,622,538 spentof which $167,746 as grants
    32% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $5,121,725.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($3.1M) Expenses 100 ($2.1M) Net assets 100 ($2.6M)2020 Revenue 169 ($5.3M) Expenses 257 ($5.4M) Net assets 97 ($2.5M)2021 Revenue 155 ($4.9M) Expenses 209 ($4.4M) Net assets 113 ($2.9M)2022 Revenue 230 ($7.2M) Expenses 285 ($6.0M) Net assets 160 ($4.1M)2023 Revenue 117 ($3.7M) Expenses 285 ($6.0M) Net assets 68 ($1.7M)2024 Revenue 289 ($9.1M) Expenses 340 ($7.2M) Net assets 169 ($4.3M)
201920202021202220232024
Revenue (289)Expenses (340)Net assets (169)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $1.9M to $4.6M (+142%).

$2.6M
$3.4M
$3.0M
$4.3M
$1.9M
$4.6M
201920202021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2019 4% · 2020 9% · 2021 15% · 2022 21% · 2023 5% · 2024 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

99% of CONSERVATION X LABS INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (74% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,657 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.0M
’19
−$118k
’20
$427k
’21
$1.2M
’22
−$2.4M
’23
$1.9M
’24
4.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Dr Alex Dehgan

CEO

Board chair

Alexandra Hartman

Chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

201920202021202220232024
Listed101010977
Joined·+0+0+0+0+0
No longer listed·00120
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 10 funders, grant income rose $1.0M → $2.8M.

9 of 31 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 12% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CONSERVATION X LABS INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 31 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CONSERVATION X LABS INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 48% of grant income and the top three 78%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

48%
largest funder
78%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 63% · 2018 100% · 2019 64% · 2020 49% · 2021 53% · 2022 67% · 2023 74% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

40% of CONSERVATION X LABS INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 32% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

CONSERVATION X LABS INC draws 98% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 11 states in all.

WA
IL
NY
MA
CA
VA
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $3.4M arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

CONSERVATION X LABS INC has grown faster than three-quarters of the 1,559 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin21% · above the median
Months of reserve4.1mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)24% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,559 animals nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Government funding CONSERVATION X LABS INC receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $2.4M on record.

Federal$2.4M
grants $2.3Mcontracts $50k
17
20
22
23
Top agencies
  • Agency for International Development$2.3M
  • Department of Agriculture$97k
  • Department of the Interior$50k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like CONSERVATION X LABS INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

71% of spending goes to programs.

Program 71%Management 22%Fundraising 7%

Governance

7
board members
71%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

45%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 2 states

WA
DC

Part of a family of 2 related entities

  • Conservation X Labs Pbc · corp_trust
  • Thylacine Biosciences Inc · corp_trust

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CONSERVATION X LABS INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CONSERVATION X LABS INC?
CONSERVATION X LABS INC (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 31 organizations whose IRS filings report $28,817,188 to it, the largest being GORDON E AND BETTY I MOORE FOUNDATION ($13,829,482). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CONSERVATION X LABS INC have?
IRS filings report 31 organizations giving $28,817,188 in grants to CONSERVATION X LABS INC, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CONSERVATION X LABS INC?
GORDON E AND BETTY I MOORE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $13,829,482 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CONSERVATION X LABS INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2019–2024), and the filings of 31 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing