Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit
JUSTICE IN AGING
JUSTICE IN AGING (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 58 organizations whose IRS filings report $13,858,911 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($3,140,175). 39 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $6.9M
- Funders on record
- 58
- Grants received
- $14M
- Net assets
- $9.3M
What Justice in Aging does
Mission
The mission of Justice in Aging is to advocate nationwide to promote the independence and well-being of low-income elderly and disabled americans.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Programs
Health care advocacy - Justice in Aging ensures that low-income older americans are able to access high quality, affordable health and long-term care through medicaid, medicare, and other programs. Through Justice in Aging's expertise in law, elder rights, and the government programs that deliver health care to low-income seniors, Justice in Aging breaks down barriers low-income seniors face in getting the care they need. Justice in Aging advocates to ensure that health care services prioritize home and community-based services over institutions, honor choice, and include strong consumer protections. Further, by focusing Justice in Aging's work on populations who have been marginalized and excluded from justice. Justice in Aging addresses disparities in access to health care caused by (continue on schedule o) (continued from page 2, part iii) ethnicity, english language proficiency, disability, gender identity, sexual orientation, or other potential disadvantage. Justice in Aging advances the health care rights of older adults through an innovative combination of training and technical assistance to local advocates and service providers, administrative and legislative advocacy,…
$4,901,804 spent$189,309 earned by the program73% of program spendingEconomic security advocacy - Justice in Aging preserves, strengthens, expands, and improves the income supports that help low-income older americans afford food, shelter, and other basic necessities. Justice in Aging uses its legal expertise to protect and improve programs such as social security and supplemental security income (ssi) so they provide adequate funds to help low-income seniors meet their basic needs; are accessible to all seniors who qualify without arbitrary disruptions, denials, or delays; and are delivered without discrimination based on race, ethnicity, language ability, disability, gender identity, sexual orientation, or other potential disadvantage. Justice in Aging advances the economic security of older adults through an innovative combination of training and technical assistance to local (continue on schedule o) (continued from page 2, part iii) advocates and service providers, administrative advocacy, and impact litigation. Each year, Justice in Aging provides training and advice on economic security issues to several thousand direct service providers.
$1,177,132 spent17% of program spendingLitigation - as the only national organization focused solely on protecting the rights of low-income seniors, Justice in Aging partners with advocates on the ground who help Justice in Aging monitor and uncover issues that impact poor seniors. When a group needs a champion in the courts, Justice in Aging is there, on its own or in partnership with other organizations, to litigate precedent-setting cases that benefit hundreds of thousands of seniors.
$661,649 spent10% of program spending
The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $6,740,585.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $4.8M to $9.5M (+97%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 19% · 2018 42% · 2019 35% · 2020 32% · 2021 31% · 2022 16% · 2023 34% · 2024 37% · 2025 30%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Chief executive
Kevin Prindiville
Executive director
Board chair
Jean Accius
Chair
As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 10 funders to 21 funders, grant income rose $495k → $2.1M.
14 of 58 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 36% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of JUSTICE IN AGING’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 58 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
JUSTICE IN AGING has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 23% of grant income, and it takes 6 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 6 funders to its left
54% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund JUSTICE IN AGING.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 50% · 2018 31% · 2019 52% · 2020 32% · 2021 21% · 2022 54% · 2023 17% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
54% of JUSTICE IN AGING's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 67% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
JUSTICE IN AGING draws 95% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 11 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $5.0M arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Government funding JUSTICE IN AGING receives
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $13.2M on record — $13.2M federal, $516 state.
- Department of Health and Human Services$13.2M
- OUT-OF-STATE AIR TRANSPORTATION$266
- OUT-OF-STATE GROUND TRANSPORTATION$196
- OUT-OF-STATE MEALS WITH OVERNIGHT STAY$42
- OUT-OF-STATE MILEAGE REIMB-NONEMPLOYEE$12
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Organizations like JUSTICE IN AGING
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Washington, D.C.
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
87% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
97%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for JUSTICE IN AGING: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds JUSTICE IN AGING?
- JUSTICE IN AGING (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 58 organizations whose IRS filings report $13,858,911 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($3,140,175). 39 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does JUSTICE IN AGING have?
- IRS filings report 58 organizations giving $13,858,911 in grants to JUSTICE IN AGING, 39 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of JUSTICE IN AGING?
- FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $3,140,175 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like JUSTICE IN AGING find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Justice in Aging →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 58 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing