How much did NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION grant in FY2024?

Housing & Shelter$454MCommunity Improvement$104MHuman Services$65MPhilanthropy$9.9MFood & Nutrition$3.6MHealth$3.0MEducation$2.4MReligion$2.3MYouth Development$1.6MOther$151M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

temporarilyoak hillmutual buildstrong healthyhealthy prosperousprosperous ruralrural special

2021

scholarspsehomeownership middlemiddle working-classworking-class ableable buildstrong thriving

2022

digitalmon valleyconsumersmortgage financefinance authoritysupplyhousing authority

2023

innovationsdemocracy collaborativemon valleydataconsumersfinance authoritymeaningful

2024

youngstownyndcrenewable energyhousing authoritymeaningfulconsumersassisting housing

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 328 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k3 grants · $26k
$10k–50k32 grants · $709k
$50k–250k69 grants · $11M
$250k+224 grants · $104M

$322,750

Median grant

States reached

$75M

Total assets

Largest grants

NEIGHBORWORKS CAPITAL CORPORATION$2,500,000
COMMUNITY HOUSING CAPITAL INC$2,500,000
MONEY MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL INC$1,773,807
NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE$1,638,972
CREDITORG$1,057,225
NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT COUNSELING INC$982,764
COMMUNITY HOUSING PARTNERS CORPORATION$947,250
CREDIT ADVISORS FOUNDATION$914,320
UNIDOSUS$890,887
ILLINOIS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY$890,886
PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY$890,886
CONSUMER CREDIT AND BUDGET COUNSELING INC$832,357
GREENPATH INC$813,113
NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION CORPORATION$812,938
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS GEORGIA HOUSING AND FINANCE AUTHOR$801,451

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $54.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$789M · 346 repeat orgs$7.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

346 repeat relationships — 312 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

346

Total granted

$789M

$6.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%

+39%

Still filing today

95%

76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $389k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Housing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NC
NeighborWorks Capital Corporation
7× · 2018–2024 · $18M · revenue +73% · 34% of their budget
CH
Community Housing Capital Inc
5× · 2018–2022 · $13M · revenue +43% · 26% of their budget
FI
Fahe Inc
7× · 2018–2024 · $5.4M · revenue +191%

Funded once

MH
Minnesota Homeownership Center
one grant, 2022 · $1.2M · revenue -10%
NC
National Community Reinvestment Coalitiongraduated
one grant, 2023 · $1.1M · revenue +565%
TC
Telamon Corporation
one grant, 2022 · $1.1M · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Community Housing Partnership

Providing affordable housing to underserved communities locally and around the world.

Housing & Shelter

Neighborhood Nonprofit Housing Corp

Create quality affordable housing opportunities, enhance communities and provide households with skills to become self-sufficient.

Housing & Shelter

Capital Area Housing Partnership

Develops neighborhoods with a focus on affordable housing, homeownership, and financial security.

Housing & Shelter

Chn Housing Capital

Chn housing capital is a certified community development financial institution serving low-income individuals and distressed communities guided by the belief that homeownership should be within everyone's reach.

Human Services

Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

Create opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives and communities.

—

Housing Plus

Innovatively utilize resources to preserve & create quality affordable multi-family housing

Housing & Shelter

New Home Development Company Inc

Nhdc offers affordable housing options for persons with low to moderate incomes.

Housing & Shelter

California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified

Northeast Brooklyn Housing Develop

The Organization is commited to the preservation, development, and management of affordable housing and home ownership opportunities:community and economic development initiative and human services to effect social change in central…

Housing & Shelter

Incommon Housing Development Corporation

To strengthen neighborhoods by developing and preserving affordable, dignified housing.

Housing & Shelter

National Neighborhood Housing Network

The mission of NNA is to unite housing and community development practitioners to advocate for housing and economic opportunities for individuals, families, communities, and neighborhoods across the country. Since 1996, NNA has been an…

Community Improvement

North West Housing Partnership

Established in 1990, North West Housing Partnership (NWHP) is a nonprofit agency that promotes public and private partnerships that create and preserve cost-effective quality housing for low to moderate income residents and workers through…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborhood Housing Services of and the most unlike its peers is Aeon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.5%2/387

the rest of the field

11%

206,162/1,819,178

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

363 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

112

Early backer (in before they grew)

361/363

Grantees still filing

295/363

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Housing & Shelter$454,057,833Other$156,831,676Community Improvement$103,801,510Human Services$64,905,795Philanthropy$9,879,274Food & Nutrition$3,570,040Health$3,044,656

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Community Partners IncMD114.4× affinity114 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Community Partners Inc · The Housing Partnership Network Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Opportunity Finance Network · National Association for Latino · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · National Fair Housing Alliance · The Kresge Foundation · National Low Income Housing Coalition · Housing Assistance Council · Unidosus · THDF II Inc DBA

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

18get no government money at all

4rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Mission Economic Development Agency.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.3× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 371410246 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Mission Economic Development Agency, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 97% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation?

Find your warmest path to Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

363 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation?

More from the funding graph

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

363 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation?

More from the funding graph