Skip to content
Plinth
FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Arizona · Nonprofit

LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY

LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY (Arizona) receives grants from 36 organizations whose IRS filings report $21,784,041 to it, the largest being JPMORGAN CHASE FOUNDATION ($7,500,000). 21 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$79M
Revenue FY2025
36
Funders on record
$22M
Grants received
$749M
Net assets
21/36 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%

Against its field

LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 3,681 education nonprofits its size.

Months of reserve6.5mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)16% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,681 education nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($24M) Expenses 100 ($23M) Net assets 100 ($550M)2018 Revenue 238 ($56M) Expenses 121 ($28M) Net assets 104 ($574M)2019 Revenue 170 ($40M) Expenses 132 ($31M) Net assets 105 ($576M)2020 Revenue 169 ($40M) Expenses 136 ($31M) Net assets 102 ($562M)2021 Revenue 270 ($64M) Expenses 150 ($34M) Net assets 135 ($740M)2022 Revenue 234 ($56M) Expenses 165 ($38M) Net assets 110 ($606M)2023 Revenue 233 ($55M) Expenses 219 ($50M) Net assets 126 ($694M)2024 Revenue 251 ($60M) Expenses 214 ($49M) Net assets 131 ($722M)2025 Revenue 335 ($79M) Expenses 265 ($61M) Net assets 136 ($749M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (335)Expenses (265)Net assets (136)Peer revenue range
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 5 funders to 14 funders, grant income rose $1.3M → $4.6M.

6 of 36 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)9% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 36 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 34% of grant income and the top three 70%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

34%
largest funder
70%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 79% · 2018 71% · 2019 69% · 2020 44% · 2021 47% · 2022 65% · 2023 71%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

43% of LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 58% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Arizona, across 18 states in all.

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MD
NM
AR
SC
DC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Arizona out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $2.0M arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 36 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $343k on record.

Federal$343k
grants $330kcontracts $13k
20
22
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of the Interior$343k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Arizona

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY?
LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY (Arizona) receives grants from 36 organizations whose IRS filings report $21,784,041 to it, the largest being JPMORGAN CHASE FOUNDATION ($7,500,000). 21 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY have?
IRS filings report 36 organizations giving $21,784,041 in grants to LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY, 21 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY?
JPMORGAN CHASE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $7,500,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Arizona. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 36funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing