Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Citi Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67M
Granted FY2024still arriving
145
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$3.8M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

International$152MCommunity Improvement$133MYouth Development$27MHousing & Shelter$25MEducation$20MEmployment$20MHuman Services$20MCivil Rights$13MOther$0
02FY2024 · 145 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+131 grants · $65M
$400,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$101M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL BANKERS COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC$3,750,000
UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME$2,000,000
AFRICAN AMERICAN ALLIANCE OF CDFI CEOS INC$2,000,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC$1,800,000
URBAN INSTITUTE$1,000,000
PHILANTHROPY NEW YORK INC$1,000,000
NPOWER INC$700,000
CITIES FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT FUND INC$650,000
NETWORK FOR TEACHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP$600,000
DOE FUND INC$500,000
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA$500,000
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA$500,000
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA$500,000
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA$500,000
DIGNITYMOVES$500,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $41.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $500k → 11%LEADERSHIP TRAINING INC: $400k → 6%START SMALL THINK BIG: $500k → 17%THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC: $500k → 20%JACKSONVILLE URBAN LEAGUE INC: $500k → 14%MIAMI HOMES FOR ALL INC: $500k → 15%PUBLIC ALLIES INC: $1.1M → 17%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $250k → 10%START SMALL THINK BIG INC: $400k → 17%GROW BROOKLYN INC: $500k → 20%PUBLIC ALLIES: $1.0M → 17%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $250k → 10%URBAN LEAGUE OF BROWARD COUNTY INCORPORATED: $400k → 13%PUBLIC ALLIES: $500k → 17%URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY INC: $500k → 16%PUBLIC ALLIES INC: $250k → 17%WORKING CREDIT NFP: $400k → 14%PRINCE GEORGE'S CHILD RESOURCE CENTER INC: $500k → 11%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $500k → 9%LIVING CITIES INC THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE: $2.4M → 17%CHILDREN'S COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO: $500k → 10%RISEBORO COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $400k → 20%NATIONAL BANKERS COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC: $5.3M → 14%WORKING SOLUTIONS CDFI: $500k → 10%NATIONAL BANKERS COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC: $3.8M → 14%NATIONAL BANKERS COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC: $1.0M → 14%CITY FIRST ENTEPRISES INC: $500k → 14%POSSIBILITY LABS: $500k → 10%CENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERS: $400k → 14%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $500k → 14%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK: $500k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500k → 17%LIFE ASSET INC: $500k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE: $450k → 17%ACCOMPANY CAPITAL INC: $500k → 17%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $500k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $500k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $500k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $500k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $500k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $500k → 14%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $500k → 17%FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $500k → 14%ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION: $500k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $500k → 17%GLASSWING INTERNATIONAL USA: $500k → 17%UNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION: $500k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
SD
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 22% of Citi Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Citi Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$271M · 157 repeat orgs$74M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

157 repeat relationships — 54 still active in FY2024, 103 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

157
104

Total granted

$271M
$58M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+12%

Still filing today

92%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesInternationalHousing & ShelterEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CITIES FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT FUND INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $15M · revenue +25% · 59% of their budget
  • JW
    JA WORLDWIDE INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $12M · revenue +30%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $11M · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5.0M · revenue -74%
  • SHARE OUR STRENGTH
    one grant, 2020 · $5.0M · revenue -44%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2.9M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Enterprise Community Investment Inc

All our efforts support our strategic goals to increase housing supply, advance racial equity and build resilience and upward mobility.the organization raises private capital through investment and by forming effective partnerships.…

Housing & Shelter
2
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…

—
3
New York City Energy Efficiency Corporation

Nyceec's mission is to deliver financing solutions and advance markets for energy efficiency and clean energy in communities.

Environment
4
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
5
Community Credit Lab

To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.

Human Services
6
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
7
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
8
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
9
Community Vision Capital & Consulting

Community vision capital & consulting promotes economic justice and alleviates poverty by increasing the financial resilience and sustainability of community-based nonprofits and enterprises. through flexible financial products and sound…

Community Improvement
10
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
11
Cdc Small Business Finance Corporation

We help build inclusive and equitable communities by providing people access to the capital and opportunities they deserve.

Community Improvement
12
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Local Initiatives Support Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Seventh Regiment Armory Conservancy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Food Banks and PantriesEnvironmental Conservation …Immigrant Worker SupportLocal Food System Organizat…Community Food PantriesYmca Youth DevelopmentPolicy Research and AdvocacyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Lgbtq+ Community SupportJewish Community Organizati…Youth Sports ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …Youth Development ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesAffordable Housing Developm…Local History MuseumsCommunity FoundationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Senior Support ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsDevelopmental Disabilities …Community College Foundatio…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%34%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%45%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.4%1/278
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,287

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

276 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 276 of the 303 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

20
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
42
Early backer (in before they grew)
273/276
Grantees still filing
173/276
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $101,675,000 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMER…+7 more — $4,560,000 · PhilanthropyLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $18,700,000 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT C…CITIES FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT FUND INC — $14,685,000 · Community ImprovementCITIES FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWE…CALVERT IMPACT CAPITAL INC — $10,000,000 · Community ImprovementCALVERT IMPACT CAPITAL INCNPOWER INC — $8,200,000 · Community ImprovementNPOWER INCAfrican American Alliance of CDFI CEOs — $5,000,000 · Community ImprovementFINANCIAL HEALTH NETWORK INC — $4,550,000 · Community Improvement+44 more — $38,350,000 · Community Improvement+44 moreUNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $12,060,000 · InternationalUNITED NATION…International Rescue Committee INC — $11,125,000 · InternationalInternational…TECHNOSERVE INC — $7,395,000 · InternationalTECHNOSERVE I…UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC — $5,000,000 · InternationalUNITED NATION…EDUCATION FOR EMPLOYMENT — $1,800,000 · InternationalTHE TRUST FOR THE AMERICAS — $1,680,000 · International+12 more — $10,265,000 · International+12 moreNATIONAL BANKERS COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC — $10,000,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL B…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $4,100,000 · Human ServicesAmerican N…LIVING CITIES INC THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE — $2,900,000 · Human ServicesLIVING CIT…PUBLIC ALLIES INC — $2,850,000 · Human ServicesPUBLIC ALL…COVENANT HOUSE — $1,450,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $1,250,000 · Human Services+24 more — $14,210,000 · Human Services+24 moreSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $5,000,000 · OtherSHARE OUR STRENGTHIndividual grant recipient — $2,850,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,850,000 · OtherNETWORK FOR TEACHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP — $6,200,000 · OtherNETWORK FOR TEACHIN…THE URBAN INSTITUTE — $3,000,000 · Other+70 more — $51,720,000 · Other+70 moreJA WORLDWIDE INC — $11,875,000 · EducationECHOING GREEN INC — $4,500,000 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $3,000,000 · EducationMANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FOR TOMORROW — $2,460,000 · EducationThurgood Marshall College Fund — $2,000,000 · EducationSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC — $1,400,000 · EducationNATIONAL DISABILITY INSTITUTE INC — $1,250,000 · Education+7 more — $3,900,000 · EducationOPPORTUNITY FINANCE NETWORK — $5,000,000 · Public BenefitCAPITAL IMPACT PARTNERS — $5,000,000 · Public BenefitINCLUSIV INC — $2,575,000 · Public BenefitCODE FOR AMERICA LABS INC — $2,550,000 · Public BenefitTHE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FUND INC — $1,250,000 · Public Benefit
Philanthropy$106,235,000Community Improvement$99,485,000International$49,325,000Human Services$36,760,000Other$71,620,000Education$30,385,000Public Benefit$16,375,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $101,675,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $18,700,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetCITIES FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT FUND INC — $14,685,000 over 5y, 59% of budgetUNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $12,060,000 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetJA WORLDWIDE INC — $11,875,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $11,125,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL BANKERS COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC — $10,000,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetCALVERT IMPACT CAPITAL INC — $10,000,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetNPOWER INC — $8,200,000 over 5y, 8.8% of budgetTECHNOSERVE INC — $7,395,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetNETWORK FOR TEACHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP — $6,200,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetOPPORTUNITY FINANCE NETWORK — $5,000,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC — $5,000,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCAPITAL IMPACT PARTNERS — $5,000,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetAfrican American Alliance of CDFI CEOs — $5,000,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $5,000,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetFINANCIAL HEALTH NETWORK INC — $4,550,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetECHOING GREEN INC — $4,500,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $4,100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $3,000,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE URBAN INSTITUTE — $3,000,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS — $3,000,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetLIVING CITIES INC THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE — $2,900,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetPUBLIC ALLIES INC — $2,850,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetINCLUSIV INC — $2,575,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetCODE FOR AMERICA LABS INC — $2,550,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetMANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FOR TOMORROW — $2,460,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund — $2,000,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR MICROENTERPRISE OPPORTUNITY — $2,000,000 over 2y, 46% of budgetCREDIT BUILDERS ALLIANCE INC — $2,000,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetEDUCATION FOR EMPLOYMENT — $1,800,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetIMENTOR INC — $1,750,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR THE AMERICAS — $1,680,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetTHE LAKOTA FUND INCORPORATED — $1,500,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $1,450,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPROSPERITY NOW — $1,450,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetPACIFIC COAST REGIONAL SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,400,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetPACIFIC ASIAN CONSORTIUM IN EMPLOYMENT — $1,400,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC — $1,400,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $1,290,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $1,250,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSMART GROWTH AMERICA — $1,250,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetNATIONAL DISABILITY INSTITUTE INC — $1,250,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INC — $1,250,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $1,250,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FUND INC — $1,250,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetLawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law — $1,250,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetNational Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development — $1,250,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wells Fargo FoundationMufg Union Bank Found…Capital One Foundatio…Opportunity Finance N…Td Charitable Foundat…National Association …Enterprise Community …Annie E Casey Foundat…Tides FoundationRobin Hood FoundationWebster Bank Charitab…The Kresge Foundation
Wells Fargo FoundationMN84.9× affinity68 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wells Fargo Foundation · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Capital One Foundation Inc · Opportunity Finance Network · Td Charitable Foundation · National Association for Latino Community Asset Builders · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · Webster Bank Charitable Foundation · The Kresge Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Citi Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • Prince George's Financial Services Corporation — 61% of income from government
  • Homefree Usa Inc — 54% of income from government
  • True Access Capital Corporation — 48% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Urban League of Essex County — 20% of income from government
  • International Youth Foundation — 17% of income from government
  • Prince George's Child Resource Centerinc — 17% of income from government
  • Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Jacksonville Urban League Inc — 7% of income from government
  • The Community Builders Inc — 4% of income from government
  • African American Alliance of Cdfi CEOs — 3% of income from government
  • Hispanic Unity of Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
  • All Our Kin Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Ywca South Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
66report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 303 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines