Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Capital One Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36M
Granted FY2025still arriving
102
Grants FY2025still arriving
19
States reached
$10M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.

Community Improvement$33MEducation$14MEmployment$6.4MPhilanthropy$5.0MHousing & Shelter$4.8MCivil Rights$4.2MInternational$3.5MYouth Development$2.9MOther$0
02FY2025 · 102 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k76 grants · $8.7M
  • $250k+25 grants · $27M
$125,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$328M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPPORTUNITY FINANCE NETWORK$10,000,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS$5,000,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS$1,400,000
UNIDOSUS$1,000,000
NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC$1,000,000
CENTER FOR RESPONSIBLE LENDING$1,000,000
HISPANIC ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES$600,000
CHANGE MACHINE$560,000
DRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE$510,000
NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORP$500,000
BRAVEN INC$500,000
DELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$500,000
OPPORTUNITY FINANCE NETWORK$500,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS$500,000
WASHINGTON AREA COMMUNITY INVESTMENT FUND INC$450,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $4.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PREPARE AND PROSPER: $50k → 14%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $100k → 17%COMMUNITY ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $100k → 8%LA CASA DE DON PEDRO: $20k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER RICHMOND: $50k → 22%KOREATOWN YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $40k → 14%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $20k → 13%RAISE TEXAS: $35k → 10%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $30k → 16%URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY: $10k → 16%SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS OF NEW ORLEANS: $150k → 23%ASCEND DALLAS: $50k → 14%CREDIT COALITION: $5k → 16%BAKERRIPLEY: $50k → 16%FIRST 72: $100k → 23%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $30k → 20%THE CONCILIO: $35k → 14%ON THE ROAD LENDING: $50k → 14%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $75k → 14%SASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK INC: $150k → 14%CHANGE MACHINE: $560k → 17%CHANGE MACHINE: $94k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE: $50k → 17%YMCA OF GREATER NEW YORK: $50k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $1.1M → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $1.0M → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $117k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $100k → 17%NEW FUTURES: $150k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
NC
DC
LA
MS
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of Capital One Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Capital One Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$44M · 50 repeat orgs$37M to everyone else

50 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 62 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
164

Total granted

$44M
$26M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

82%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementEducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    OPPORTUNITY FINANCE NETWORK
    3× · 2018–2025 · $11M · revenue +965%
  • NU
    NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +4%
  • BI
    BRAVEN INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • RL
    Rockwood Leadership Institute
    one grant, 2022 · $2.8M · revenue -41%
  • TC
    THE COMMON APPLICATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.4M · revenue +78%
  • SF
    STUDENT FREEDOM INITIATIVE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1.1M · revenue -61%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
2
Enterprise Community Investment Inc

All our efforts support our strategic goals to increase housing supply, advance racial equity and build resilience and upward mobility.the organization raises private capital through investment and by forming effective partnerships.…

Housing & Shelter
3
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
4
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
5
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
6
New York City Energy Efficiency Corporation

Nyceec's mission is to deliver financing solutions and advance markets for energy efficiency and clean energy in communities.

Environment
7
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
8
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
9
Housing Partnership Development Corporation

Housing partnership development corporation functions to provide available low and moderate cost housing in the new york metro area through new housing production, preservation, rehabilitation, as well as the revitalization and…

Housing & Shelter
10
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
11
Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement
12
The Louisville Urban League Inc

As an active partner, leader and catalyst, we will assist african americans, other minority groups and the disadvantaged attain social and economic equality and stability through direct services and advocacy.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Local Initiatives Support Corporation and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsImmigrant Worker SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Environmental Conservation …Community College Foundatio…Affordable Housing Developm…Food Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/243
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,322

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

241 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 241 of the 282 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
45
Early backer (in before they grew)
237/241
Grantees still filing
121/241
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS — $8,360,000 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR…INSTITUTE FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP INC — $989,640 · Community ImprovementINSTITUTE FOR ENTREPRENE…LATINO BUSINESS ACTION NETWORK INC — $880,000 · Community ImprovementLATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $750,000 · Community Improvement+37 more — $7,271,211 · Community Improvement+37 moreHISPANIC ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES — $2,900,000 · EducationHISPANIC ASSOCIAT…THE COMMON APPLICATION INC — $1,400,000 · EducationTHE COMMON APPLIC…President and Fellows of Harvard College — $1,400,000 · EducationPresident and Fel…STUDENT FREEDOM INITIATIVE INC — $1,100,000 · EducationSTUDENT FREEDOM I…DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $787,000 · EducationDELAWARE STATE UN…HISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $775,000 · EducationHISPANIC SCHOLARS…PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION ADVANCEMENT INC — $650,000 · EducationDIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION — $500,000 · EducationKHAN ACADEMY INC — $449,500 · Education+23 more — $3,357,508 · Education+23 moreUNIDOSUS — $1,000,000 · OtherCENTER FOR LAW AND SOCIAL POLICY — $1,100,000 · OtherCenter for Responsible Lending — $1,000,000 · OtherBRAVEN INC — $2,000,000 · OtherBRAVEN INCMDRC — $1,495,000 · OtherMDRCTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $1,000,000 · OtherTHE URBAN INSTITUTE — $1,350,000 · OtherFeeding America — $1,000,000 · Other+87 more — $17,291,198 · Other+87 moreOPPORTUNITY FINANCE NETWORK — $10,930,000 · Public BenefitOPPORTUNITY FIN…CONNECT TO COMPETE INC — $460,000 · Public Benefit+3 more — $450,000 · Public BenefitRockwood Leadership Institute — $2,750,000 · PhilanthropyRockwood …IMPACT CHARITABLE — $1,100,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACT CH…BLACK ECONOMIC ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $1,005,000 · PhilanthropyBLACK ECO…DELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $749,000 · PhilanthropyDELAWARE …COMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $550,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY…JUSTICE OUTSIDE — $275,000 · Philanthropy+4 more — $445,000 · Philanthropy+4 moreKIVA MICROFUNDS — $3,500,000 · InternationalDRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE — $510,000 · InternationalRURAL ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION INTERNATION — $275,000 · International+1 more — $50,000 · InternationalNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $2,191,500 · Human ServicesChange Machine — $654,018 · Human ServicesNBMBAA-AUSTIN CHAPTER — $284,500 · Human ServicesHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD — $200,000 · Human ServicesSASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesSOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS OF NEW ORLEANS — $150,000 · Human ServicesNEW FUTURES — $150,000 · Human Services+6 more — $425,000 · Human Services
Community Improvement$18,250,851Education$13,319,008Other$27,236,198Public Benefit$11,840,000Philanthropy$6,874,000International$4,335,000Human Services$4,205,018

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOPPORTUNITY FINANCE NETWORK — $10,930,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS — $8,360,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetKIVA MICROFUNDS — $3,500,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetHISPANIC ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES — $2,900,000 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetRockwood Leadership Institute — $2,750,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $2,191,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetBRAVEN INC — $2,000,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetMDRC — $1,495,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE COMMON APPLICATION INC — $1,400,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $1,400,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE URBAN INSTITUTE — $1,350,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSTUDENT FREEDOM INITIATIVE INC — $1,100,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetCENTER FOR LAW AND SOCIAL POLICY — $1,100,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetIMPACT CHARITABLE — $1,100,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetBLACK ECONOMIC ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $1,005,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFeeding America — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP INC — $989,640 over 1y, 28% of budgetLATINO BUSINESS ACTION NETWORK INC — $880,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetDELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $787,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetHISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $775,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $750,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetDELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $749,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC — $700,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION — $675,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR NEW DATA — $660,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION ADVANCEMENT INC — $650,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMISSION ASSET FUND — $552,711 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $550,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWASHINGTON AREA COMMUNITY INVESTMENT FUND INC — $550,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetONE FAIR WAGE INC — $550,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE CHESAPEAKE BAY INC — $550,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $525,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetEMERALD SOUTH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COLLOBORATIVE — $500,000 over 1y, 61% of budgetCONNECT TO COMPETE INC — $460,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetOUTDOOR AFRO — $450,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC — $449,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetRACE FORWARD — $440,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetBronx Overall Economic Development Corporation — $400,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE REINVESTMENT FUND INC — $357,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBOWIE BUSINESS INNOVATION CENTER INC — $350,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetTHE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC — $340,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND INC — $335,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLATINO DONOR COLLABORATIVE INC — $330,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $325,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYEAR UP INC — $325,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC — $300,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Citi FoundationWells Fargo FoundationTd Charitable Foundat…Opportunity Finance N…Robin Hood FoundationEnterprise Community …Tides FoundationWebster Bank Charitab…Neighborhood Reinvest…The Prudential Founda…WK Kellogg FoundationThe Kresge Foundation
Citi FoundationNY67.6× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Citi Foundation · Wells Fargo Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Opportunity Finance Network · Robin Hood Foundation · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Tides Foundation · Webster Bank Charitable Foundation · Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation · The Prudential Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · The Kresge Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Capital One Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • True Access Capital Corporation — 48% of income from government
  • Center On Rural Innovation Inc — 37% of income from government
  • Garden State Community Development Corporation — 30% of income from government
  • Teen Warehouse Inc — 28% of income from government
  • Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Inc — 28% of income from government
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Housing and Community Development Network of New Jersey Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Just-a-Start Corporation — 16% of income from government
  • Delaware Community Reinvestment Action Council Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Delaware Community Foundation Inc — 13% of income from government
  • Tech Goes Home Incorporated — 10% of income from government
  • The Housing Partnership Network Inc — 10% of income from government
  • New Jersey Citizen Action Education Fund Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Commonwealth Kitchen Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Jamaica Plain Neighborhood Development Corporation — 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Rebuild Metro Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Community Loan Fund of New Jersey Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Digital Harbor Foundation — 2% of income from government
  • Humanim Inc — 1% of income from government
  • The Bottom Line Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
60report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Capital One Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Capital One Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 282 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines