Skip to content
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

The NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen their communities.

$100M
Granted FY2025still arriving
284
Grants FY2025still arriving
52
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$670MCommunity Improvement$115MHuman Services$67MCivil Rights$10MFood & Nutrition$7.0MPhilanthropy$3.3MHealth$3.2MEducation$2.5MOther$0
02FY2025 · 284 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $382k
  • $50k–250k39 grants · $6.5M
  • $250k+225 grants · $92M
$337,500
Median grant
52
States reached
$68M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEIGHBORWORKS CAPITAL CORPORATION$2,500,000
COMMUNITY HOUSING CAPITAL INC$2,500,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY$708,600
COMMONBOND COMMUNITIES$672,750
MOUNTAIN HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES INC$658,000
HOMEPORT$654,667
DHIC INC$641,927
NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP HOUSING SERVICES$640,125
TENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$633,250
AFFORDABLE HOMES & COMMUNITIES$616,750
THE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPERS INC$614,910
NEIGHBORWORKS HOME PARTNERS$601,346
AVENUE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$597,710
FAHE INC$588,250
GROW SOUTH DAKOTA$557,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $53.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Credit Advisors Foundation: $1.0M → 12%NeighborWorks Pocatello: $487k → 14%Creditorg: $1.2M → 11%MONEY MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL INC: $2.4M → 8%COMMUNITY SERV PROGRAMS OF W ALABAMA INC: $492k → 17%Telamon Corporation: $1.1M → 8%CONSUMER CREDIT AND BUDGET COUNSELING INC: $832k → 10%Gulf Coast Housing Partnership Inc: $631k → 23%KENNEBEC VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM HOUSING SERVICES: $390k → 12%Penquis Community Action Program Inc: $443k → 15%Chicanos Por La Causa Inc: $777k → 11%CREDIT ADVISORS FOUNDATION: $914k → 12%NeighborWorks Pocatello: $434k → 14%CREDITORG: $1.1M → 11%MONEY MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL INC: $1.8M → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAMS OF WEST ALABAMA INC: $442k → 17%Consumer Credit and Budget Counseling Inc: $727k → 10%Gulf Coast Housing Partnership Inc: $615k → 23%Credit Advisors Foundation: $511k → 12%NeighborWorks Pocatello: $409k → 14%Creditorg: $792k → 11%MONEY MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL INC: $1.2M → 8%GreenPath Inc: $2.1M → 8%COMMUNITY SERV PROGRAMS OF W ALABAMA INC: $399k → 17%Consumer Credit and Budget Counseling Inc: $580k → 10%GULF COAST HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC: $533k → 23%Chicanos Por La Causa Inc: $757k → 11%GreenPath Inc: $1.6M → 8%GULF COAST HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC: $521k → 23%NATIONAL FDN FOR CREDIT COUNSELING INC: $2.1M → 14%GREENPATH INC: $813k → 8%Navicore Solutions: $1.6M → 6%Chicanos Por La Causa Inc: $665k → 11%Quest Community Development Organization: $664k → 13%NAVICORE SOLUTIONS: $779k → 6%Navicore Solutions: $558k → 6%Chicanos Por La Causa Inc: $659k → 11%NAT'L FOUNDATION FOR CR COUNSELING INC: $1.1M → 14%Quest Community Development Organization: $406k → 13%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $1.6M → 17%NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT COUNSELING INC: $983k → 14%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $593k → 11%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $1.2M → 17%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $517k → 11%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $507k → 11%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $439k → 11%Consumer Credit Counseling SVCS of SF: $1.5M → 10%Consumer Credit Counseling SVCS of SF: $1.2M → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$971M · 351 repeat orgs$9.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

351 repeat relationships: 277 still active in FY2025, 74 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

351
45

Total granted

$971M
$9.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+3%

Still filing today

95%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $568k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NEIGHBORWORKS CAPITAL CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23M · revenue +60% · 35% of their budget
  • CH
    Community Housing Capital Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $15M · revenue +103% · 29% of their budget
  • FO
    FEDERATION OF APPALACHIAN HOUSING ENTERPRISES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.6M · revenue +206%

Funded once

  • MH
    MINNESOTA HOME OWNERSHIP CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $1.2M · revenue -40%
  • NC
    NATIONAL COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT COALITION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1.1M · revenue +224%
  • TC
    TELAMON CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $1.1M · revenue -48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neighborhood Nonprofit Housing Corp

Create quality affordable housing opportunities, enhance communities and provide households with skills to become self-sufficient.

Housing & Shelter
2
Chn Housing Capital

Chn housing capital is a certified community development financial institution serving low-income individuals and distressed communities guided by the belief that homeownership should be within everyone's reach.

Human Services
3
Housing Plus

Innovatively utilize resources to preserve & create quality affordable multi-family housing committed to fulfilling individual housing needs and stabilize neighborhoods.

Housing & Shelter
4
Northeast Brooklyn Housing Develop

The Organization is commited to the preservation, development, and management of affordable housing and home ownership opportunities:community and economic development initiative and human services to effect social change in central…

Housing & Shelter
5
Housing Partnerships Inc

Housing Partnerships, Inc creates great communities through direct investments and partnerships.

Housing & Shelter
6
North West Housing Partnership

Through a fiscally responsible and multi-faceted approach, north west housing partnership nwhp promotes public and private partnerships that create and preserve cost-effective quality diverse housing for low to moderate-income residents…

—
7
Partnership Housing Inc

Partnership housing, inc. brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
8
Nhs Community Development Corp

Nhs revitalizes underserved neighborhoods by creating and preserving affordable housing and providing opportunities for homeownership education, financial assistance, and community leadership working in partnership with government and…

—
9
Housing Options & Planning Enterprises Inc

Housing Counseling Services - Our Housing Counseling Program supports the delivery of a wide variety of housing services to homebuyers, homeowners, and low-to-moderate -income renters. The primary objectives of the program are to expand…

Human Services
10
National Housing and Community Development Law Project

The Organization is a national housing and legal advocacy center. Its mission is to advance housing justice for poor people by: increasing and preserving the supply of decent, affordable housing; improving existing housing conditions,…

Crime & Legal
11
Home City Development Inc

1.to restore or replace substandard housing with a supply of decent, affordable, and well-managed housing for individuals and families.2.to facilitate neighborhood growth and health in collaboration with partners, leading to long-term…

Housing & Shelter
12
National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials

To advance the creation of strong, sustainable and affordable communities through advocacy, professional development, and empowerment of our diverse members.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborhood Housing Partnership of Greater Springfield; the most unlike its peers is Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

378 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 378 of the 403 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

64
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
121
Early backer (in before they grew)
375/378
Grantees still filing
294/378
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEIGHBORWORKS CAPITAL CORPORATION: $23,200,000 · Housing & Shelter+115 more: $450,260,705 · Housing & Shelter+115 moreCommunity Housing Capital Inc: $8,000,000 · OtherCOMMONBOND COMMUNITIES: $5,856,750 · OtherCommunity Housing Partners Corporation: $5,687,685 · OtherHOMEWISE INC: $5,652,779 · OtherNE SOUTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $5,198,900 · Other+36 more: $125,239,392 · Other+36 morePATHSTONE CORPORATION: $6,373,937 · Community ImprovementPATHSTONE COR…HOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION: $5,800,690 · Community ImprovementHOPE ENTERPRI…COMMUNITY LOAN FUND OF NEW JERSEY INC: $5,481,050 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY LOA…EAST BAY ASIAN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,130,723 · Community ImprovementMIDWEST MINNESOTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,124,095 · Community ImprovementIMPACT SEVEN INC: $5,030,250 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY VENTURES CORPORATION: $4,886,599 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF LONG ISLAND INC: $4,753,477 · Community ImprovementURBAN EDGE HOUSING CORPORATION: $4,526,963 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION CORPORATION: $4,500,309 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF BALTIMORE INC: $4,461,626 · Community ImprovementRURAL ENTERPRISES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $4,220,800 · Community ImprovementBUSINESS AND COMMUNITY LENDERS OF TEXAS: $4,025,439 · Community ImprovementCODMAN SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $3,723,619 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC: $3,519,636 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $3,374,312 · Community Improvement+8 more: $23,110,947 · Community Improvement+8 moreMONEY MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,512,865 · Human ServicesCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC: $5,306,820 · Human ServicesGREENPATH INC: $4,504,805 · Human ServicesNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT COUNSELING INC: $4,218,453 · Human ServicesPENQUIS CAP INC: $3,387,856 · Human ServicesPOCATELLO NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING INC: $3,165,020 · Human ServicesSPRINGBOARD NONPROFIT CONSUMER CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC: $3,127,296 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAMS OF WEST ALABAMA INC: $3,074,099 · Human ServicesGARDEN STATE CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING INC: $2,986,846 · Human ServicesGULF COAST HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC: $2,909,750 · Human ServicesCONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF SAN FRANCISCO DBA BALANCE: $2,858,550 · Human ServicesNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $2,858,550 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORIMPACT: $2,705,144 · Human ServicesNEVADA HAND INC: $4,530,840 · PhilanthropyHOMEFREE USA INC: $3,815,025 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF NORTH ALABAMA INC: $3,303,419 · PhilanthropyNEIGHBORGOOD PARTNERS INC: $4,472,040 · Food & NutritionARBOR HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT: $3,095,539 · HealthMETEC: $2,795,750 · Religion
Housing & Shelter$473,460,705Other$155,635,506Community Improvement$98,044,472Human Services$46,616,054Philanthropy$11,649,284Food & Nutrition$4,472,040Health$3,095,539Religion$2,795,750

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEIGHBORWORKS CAPITAL CORPORATION: $23,200,000 over 9y, 35% of budgetCommunity Housing Capital Inc: $15,200,000 over 6y, 29% of budgetFEDERATION OF APPALACHIAN HOUSING ENTERPRISES INC: $6,647,037 over 9y, 9.7% of budgetPATHSTONE CORPORATION: $6,373,937 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING WORKS: $6,271,914 over 9y, 5.3% of budgetTENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,999,429 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetCOMMONBOND COMMUNITIES: $5,856,750 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetHOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION: $5,800,690 over 9y, 4.0% of budgetCommunity Housing Partners Corporation: $5,687,685 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetAHC INC: $5,676,250 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetATLANTA NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP INC: $5,672,167 over 9y, 14% of budgetHOMEWISE INC: $5,652,779 over 9y, 4.8% of budgetCHAMPLAIN HOUSING TRUST: $5,560,514 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetCHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5,526,270 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetMONTANA HOMEOWNERSHIP NETWORK INC: $5,520,777 over 9y, 15% of budgetMONEY MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,512,865 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY LOAN FUND OF NEW JERSEY INC: $5,481,050 over 9y, 5.2% of budgetAvenue Community Development Corporation: $5,441,230 over 9y, 8.3% of budgetAEON: $5,428,417 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC: $5,306,820 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetMONTGOMERY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC: $5,264,301 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetCOASTAL ENTERPRISES INC: $5,240,323 over 9y, 5.9% of budgetNE SOUTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $5,198,900 over 8y, 26% of budgetEDEN HOUSING INC: $5,132,653 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetEAST BAY ASIAN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,130,723 over 9y, 4.0% of budgetMIDWEST MINNESOTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,124,095 over 9y, 9.0% of budgetIMPACT SEVEN INC: $5,030,250 over 9y, 6.0% of budgetSalt Lake Neighborhood Housing Services DBA Neighborworks Salt Lake: $4,985,790 over 9y, 33% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY: $4,971,462 over 9y, 28% of budgetDreamKey Partners Inc: $4,962,295 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF THE SOUTH SHORE INC: $4,952,841 over 9y, 15% of budgetCOMMUNITY VENTURES CORPORATION: $4,886,599 over 9y, 5.2% of budgetDHIC Inc: $4,861,827 over 9y, 11% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS FOR EQUALITY INC: $4,814,088 over 9y, 8.6% of budgetSelf-Help Enterprises: $4,812,950 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF NEW YORK CITY: $4,760,060 over 9y, 15% of budgetHOME HEADQUARTERS INC: $4,759,142 over 9y, 6.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF LONG ISLAND INC: $4,753,477 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC: $4,731,756 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetITHACA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC: $4,719,494 over 9y, 14% of budgetThe Coachella Valley Housing Coalition: $4,669,568 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetPEOPLE'S SELF HELP HOUSING CORP: $4,578,216 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF CHICAGO INC: $4,560,511 over 9y, 27% of budgetNEVADA HAND INC: $4,530,840 over 9y, 12% of budgetURBAN EDGE HOUSING CORPORATION: $4,526,963 over 9y, 7.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP OF NORTH RICHMOND: $4,526,000 over 9y, 11% of budgetHOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND INC: $4,520,548 over 9y, 14% of budgetGREENPATH INC: $4,504,805 over 3y, 5.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEIGHBORWORKS CAPITAL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Community Housing Capital Inc ↗
  • Who funds FEDERATION OF APPALACHIAN HOUSING ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds PATHSTONE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOUSING WORKS ↗
  • Who funds TENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMONBOND COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds HOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Community Housing Partners Corporation ↗
  • Who funds AHC INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWISE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPLAIN HOUSING TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA HOMEOWNERSHIP NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MONEY MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LOAN FUND OF NEW JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds Avenue Community Development Corporation ↗
  • Who funds AEON ↗
  • Who funds CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds NE SOUTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds EDEN HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST BAY ASIAN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST MINNESOTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT SEVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Salt Lake Neighborhood Housing Services DBA Neighborworks Salt Lake ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds DreamKey Partners Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF THE SOUTH SHORE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY VENTURES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds DHIC Inc ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS FOR EQUALITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Self-Help Enterprises ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds HOME HEADQUARTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF LONG ISLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Community …Wells Fargo FoundationTd Charitable Foundat…Opportunity Finance N…The Housing Partnersh…Mufg Union Bank Found…National Association …Capital One Foundatio…National Fair Housing…BBVA FoundationCiti FoundationThe Kresge Foundation
Enterprise Community Partners IncMD113.4× affinity107 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Wells Fargo Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Opportunity Finance Network · The Housing Partnership Network Inc · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · National Association for Latino Community Asset Builders · Capital One Foundation Inc · National Fair Housing Alliance · BBVA Foundation · Citi Foundation · The Kresge Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Neighborhood Stabilization Corporation: 100% of income from government
  • Windham & Windsor Housing Trust Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Neighborimpact: 68% of income from government
  • Wealth Watchers Inc: 58% of income from government
  • Homefree Usa Inc: 54% of income from government
  • Lift Community Action Agency Inc: 43% of income from government
  • Newvue Communities Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Corporation to Develop Communities of Tampa Inc: 37% of income from government
  • Neighborgood Partners Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Consumer Credit and Budget Counseling Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Mutual Housing Association of Greater Hartford Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Housing Services of Baltimore Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Affordable Housing Alliance: 21% of income from government
  • Portland Housing Center: 19% of income from government
  • Reach Community Development Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Gilman Housing Trust Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Housing Development Fund Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Champlain Housing Trust: 15% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Housing Services of New Haven Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Umpqua Community Development Corp: 12% of income from government
  • Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Garden State Consumer Credit Counseling Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Rural Enterprises of Oklahoma Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Rutland West Neighborhood Housing Services Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Lawrence Communityworks Inc: 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Downstreet Housing and Community Development Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Neighborworks Capital Corporation: 6% of income from government
  • Community and Shelter Assistance Corp: 5% of income from government
  • Way Finders Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Community Loan Fund of New Jersey Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Neighborhood Developers Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Urban Edge Housing Corporation: 2% of income from government
  • Madison Park Development Corporation: 1% of income from government
  • Pensacola Habitat for Humanity Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Housing Partnership Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
87report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 403 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Neighborhood Reinvestment’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home