How much did TD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

Housing & Shelter$14MHuman Services$14MCommunity Improvement$13MEducation$6.8MHealth$6.1MPhilanthropy$5.3MArts & Culture$5.2MYouth Development$2.5MFood & Nutrition$1.8MOther$43M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

covid responsecovid reliefemergency responseemergency relieftelemedicinecovid emergencyrelief recovery

2021

hurricane idarental reliefida disasterida reliefuncertaintylearn educationcovid rental

2022

ian reliefukrainetestlamoillehealth anniversarycancer educationnon-profit management

2023

seekersstoriesfso diversitydiversity fellowshipheadstrongstreet preservationfood economy

2024

artisticacceleratedentrepreneurial educationemployment expansionpascoinclusive artssociocracy

2025

safe affordableleading impactimpact executiveapprenticeshipschallengestailorednext generation

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 1074 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k401 grants · $1.7M
$10k–50k564 grants · $9.2M
$50k–250k96 grants · $10M
$250k+13 grants · $3.3M

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$9.0M

Total assets

Largest grants

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORP$262,500
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ATLANTIC COUNTY$250,000
SUNDARI FOUNDATION INC$250,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES$250,000
DISMAS OF VERMONT INC$250,000
HIAS AND COUNCIL MIGRATION SERVICE OF PHILADELPHIA INC$250,000
GREATER BERGEN COMMUNITY ACTION INC$250,000
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND$250,000
COMMUNITY LOAN FUND OF NEW JERSEY$250,000
SOJOURNER HOUSE$250,000
CALVARY WOMEN'S SERVICES$250,000
POPE FRANCIS CENTER$250,000
FIRST STEP STAFFING$250,000
THE HOUSING PARTNERSHIP NETWORK INC$180,000
HUDSON RIVER HOUSING INC$175,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $9.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 9%. 82% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of TD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

TD CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$84M · 1156 repeat orgs$27M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.

1156 repeat relationships — 661 still active in FY2024, 495 since wound down; 262 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1156

582

Total granted

$84M

$19M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%

Still filing today

79%

70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.9M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationArts & CultureHealthCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION
3× · 2020–2022 · $1.4M · revenue +135%
COMMUNITY LOAN FUND OF NEW JERSEY
5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +84%
NC
NATIONAL COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT COALITION INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +565%

Funded once

GA
GRAMEEN AMERICA INCgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $700k · revenue +598%
NF
NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT COUNSELING INC
one grant, 2021 · $675k · revenue -32%
AI
ASCENDUS INCgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue +32%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Massachusetts Fair Housing Center Inc

Mfhc is committed to ending systemic housing discrimination and creating inclusive communities through education, outreach, advocacy, housing counseling and enforcement.

Housing & Shelter

United Way of Connecticut Inc

The mission of united way of connecticut is to help the people of connecticut to thrive through trusted partnerships and innovative solutions.

Philanthropy

Metropolitan Boston Housing Partnership

Metro housing boston mobilizes wide-ranging resources to provide innovative and personalized services that lead families and individuals to housing stability, economic security, and an improved quality of life.

Housing & Shelter

The Bronx Parent Housing Network Inc

Bronx parent housing network is committed to making a difference in solving the housing problem in bronx parent housing network is committed to making a difference in solving the housing problem in new york city by transforming lives and…

Human Services

Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. strives to build a stronger workforce through career, skills training, employment services for career seekers, business services for employers, and labor market insights for smart workforce solutions and innovation.

Employment

Community Housing Partnership

Providing affordable housing to underserved communities locally and around the world.

Housing & Shelter

The Way Back Inc

To provide rehabilitative housing services and support to help people with psychiatric disabilities reintegrate into the community.

Human Services

Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education

Suncoast Center Inc

Strengthening, protecting and restoring lives for a healthy community.

Health

Abilitypath Housing

To advance advocacy, inclusion, and independence for people with developmental disabilities

Human Services

Apropos Housing Opportunities and Mgmt

A-home provides safe and affordable housing in northern westchester county, new york.

Housing & Shelter

New York City Energy Efficiency

Delivering financing solutions and advancing markets for energy efficiency and clean energy.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Residences and Essential and the most unlike its peers is Bardavon 1869 Opera House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.4%8/1,888

the rest of the field

11%

206,156/1,817,677

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

1561 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

487

Early backer (in before they grew)

1545/1561

Grantees still filing

1296/1561

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$52,260,050Housing & Shelter$14,405,370Human Services$14,057,887Community Improvement$12,949,355Education$6,792,237Health$6,138,491Philanthropy$5,306,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Peoples United Community FoundationCT86.3× affinity74 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Peoples United Community Foundation · Pseg Foundation Inc · Wsfs Cares Foundation · Webster Bank Charitable Foundation · The Provident Bank Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · Independence Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation TD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

Ironbound Community Corporation — 100% of income from government
Windham & Windsor Housing — 100% of income from government
Latin American Economic Development — 100% of income from government
Camden Community Partnership Inc — 94% of income from government
Housing Alliance Delaware — 74% of income from government
Cathedral Square Corporation — 73% of income from government
Greater Bergen Community Action Inc — 62% of income from government
Vermont Works for Women Inc — 52% of income from government
True Access Capital Corporation — 48% of income from government
Newvue Communities Inc — 40% of income from government
Dismas of Vermont Inc — 39% of income from government
Connecticut Institute for Refugees and — 37% of income from government
Delaware Council On Economic Education — 37% of income from government
West End Neighborhood House Inc — 36% of income from government
The Ministry of Caring Inc — 30% of income from government
International Institute of New England — 24% of income from government
Tri-County Community Action Agency — 23% of income from government
Affordable Housing Alliance — 21% of income from government
Urban League of Essex County — 20% of income from government
Wilmington Alliance Inc — 19% of income from government
Housing and Community Development — 19% of income from government
Eva's Village Inc — 19% of income from government
Gilman Housing Trust Inc — 17% of income from government
Leadership Education and Athletics — 17% of income from government
Community Access Unlimited Inc — 15% of income from government
Homeless Emergency Project Inc — 15% of income from government
Ability Housing Inc — 14% of income from government
National Association of Community — 12% of income from government
Kingswood Community Center Inc — 10% of income from government
The Housing Partnership Network Inc — 10% of income from government
Family Promise of Warren County Inc — 9% of income from government
New Jersey Citizen Action Education — 9% of income from government
Homefront Inc — 9% of income from government
Downstreet Housing and Community — 7% of income from government
Family Promise of Gainesville — 6% of income from government
Homeless Solutions Inc — 6% of income from government
Jewish Family Services of Atlantic — 6% of income from government
Project Freedom Inc — 4% of income from government
The Community Builders Inc — 4% of income from government
Familyaid Boston Inc — 4% of income from government
African American Alliance of Cdfi CEOs — 3% of income from government
Community Loan Fund of New Jersey Inc — 3% of income from government
The Neighborhood Developers Inc — 3% of income from government
The Sundari Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
Coalition for the Homeless of Central — 2% of income from government
Rising Tide Capital Inc — 2% of income from government
Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
Adrienne Arsht Center Trust Inc — 0% of income from government
Metropolitan Ministries Inc — 0% of income from government
The Vermont Community Foundation — 0% of income from government
Global Empowerment Mission Inc — 0% of income from government

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

27get no government money at all

8rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 432058202 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 75% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Td Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Td Charitable Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

More from the funding graph

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

Strange bedfellows

the named clusters of US funding

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home

State money flows

the interactive map of money crossing state lines