Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company

To proactively involve boeing employees in support of community services where they live and work.

$5.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
264
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$320k
Largest
01What you fund
0176% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202024.

Human Services$7.1MHealth$3.2MHousing & Shelter$2.4MFood & Nutrition$1.9MYouth Development$1.6MEducation$1.3MArts & Culture$1.1MCommunity Improvement$991kEmployment$889kOther$11M
02FY2024 · 264 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 264 grants below total $5,038,583 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,768,774 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $730,191 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k52 grants · $372k
  • $10k–50k196 grants · $3.6M
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $775k
  • $250k+1 grant · $320k
$12,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK$320,000
SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION$75,000
BONNEY LAKE COMMUNITY RESOURCES$50,000
SUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT INC$50,000
WEST SEATTLE FOOD BANK$50,000
TERRY HOME$50,000
WONDERLAND CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES$50,000
WHATCOM FAMILY YMCA$50,000
BABIES OF HOMELESSNESS$50,000
SKAGIT GLEANERS$50,000
ELIZABETH GREGORY HOME$50,000
SOUTH PUGET SOUND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$50,000
EVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS$50,000
EDMONDS FOOD BANK$50,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KITSAP COUNTY$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $6.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WESTSIDE BABY: $40k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $40k → 11%NETWORK TACOMA: $40k → 12%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $40k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF SOUTH SOUND: $39k → 9%WHATCOM FAMILY YMCA: $40k → 12%SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE: $40k → 9%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $40k → 9%KEY PENINSULA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50k → 9%NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $40k → 12%SENIOR SERVICES ISLAND COUNTY: $40k → 7%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $40k → 9%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $40k → 9%STILLAGUAMISH SENIOR CENTER: $40k → 9%MARTHA & MARY HEALTH SERVICES: $40k → 10%MONROE COMMUNITY SENIOR CENTER: $40k → 9%KITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $40k → 10%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NW: $40k → 9%THE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT OF KEY PENINSULA: $40k → 16%MULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER: $500k → 9%ALPHA SUPPORTED LIVING SERVICES: $40k → 9%BYRD BARR PLACE: $253k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $40k → 9%GENERATIONS WITH PRIDE: $40k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $40k → 9%MILLIONAIR CLUB INC: $40k → 9%YWCA OF SEATTLE-KING COUNTY-SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $40k → 9%HOMELESS HEALTH CARE LOS ANGELES: $41k → 14%LIFEWIRE FORMERLY EASTSIDE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROGRAM: $40k → 9%ELIZABETH GREGORY HOME: $50k → 11%SOUTHWEST YOUTH & FAM SERVICES: $46k → 9%SOUTHWEST YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $40k → 9%PARKVIEW SERVICES: $40k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $192k → 9%CATHOLIC CMTY SRVS OF WEST WA: $177k → 9%DOWN SYNDROME COMMUNITY OF PUGET SOUND: $40k → 9%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON: $250k → 9%ABUSED DEAF WOMENS ADVOCACY SERVICES: $40k → 9%HOPELINK: $40k → 9%PIONEER HUMAN SERVICES: $40k → 9%DOMESTIC ABUSE WOMENS NETWORK: $46k → 9%ATWORK: $40k → 9%FACING HOMELESSNESS: $40k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $350k → 9%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $155k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $40k → 9%CHINESE INFORMATION AND SERVICE CENTER: $132k → 9%ISSAQUAH FOOD & CLOTHING BANK: $40k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
SC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16M · 294 repeat orgs$15M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

294 repeat relationships — 150 still active in FY2024, 144 since wound down; 111 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

294
420

Total granted

$16M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+21%

Still filing today

98%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ER
    EVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS
    2× · 2022–2024 · $550k · revenue +3%
  • MC
    MULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER
    2× · 2020–2023 · $536k · revenue +453%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY
    2× · 2020–2023 · $325k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • HH
    HOUSING HOPE
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -13%
  • HS
    HOPEWORKS SOCIAL ENTERPRISES
    one grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue +25%
  • CF
    CONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
2
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services
3
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
4
Cornerhouse

The mission of cornerhouse is to partner with families, communities, and systems - entrusted with the safety of children, youth and vulnerable adults - to reduce trauma and end abuse.

Crime & Legal
5
Family Solutions Inc

Family solutions is a community based, comprehensive behavioral health provider cultivating the wellness of southwest washington by offering hope and health to children, youth and families.

Health
6
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
7
Connections for Life

Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.

Health
8
Compass Family Services

Compass family services helps homeless families and those at imminent risk to achieve housing stability, economic self-sufficiency, and well-being.

Human Services
9
Washington Vocational Services

To provide job development, job seeking skills and job placement for persons with disabilities. we are dedicated to providing outstanding quality services that result in successful community involvement and employment for persons with…

Employment
10
South Peninsula Behavioral Health Services Inc

The organization operates primarily on the Southern Kenai Peninsula and its operations include the following:Community Mental Health - Counseling, evaluation, consultation and crisis mental health services for Adults and…

Health
11
Senior Life Resources Northwest

To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.

Human Services
12
Trivium Life Services

Behavioral health, long-term support services, mental health therapy, substance, alcohol and drug abuse treatment as well as domestic violence offender intervention services

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Live and Learn Program and the most unlike its peers is St Lou Fringe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyImmigrant Worker SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Ymca Youth DevelopmentAddiction Recovery ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsEnvironmental Conservation …Youth Sports ProgramsJewish Community Organizati…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Food PantriesAnimal Rescue and ShelterDance Arts OrganizationsChristian Youth CampsElementary Literacy TutoringMilitary Veterans SupportSchool District FoundationsFaith-Based Social ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyYouth Mentoring ProgramsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community FoundationsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Lgbtq+ Community SupportChristian Missionary Organi…Public Library OperationsYouth Development CentersWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community Arts CentersUnited Way AffiliatesAffordable Housing Construc…Health Access Advocacy and …Youth Development ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Local Food System Organizat…Developmental Disabilities …Pregnancy Support ServicesEquine Therapy ProgramsCancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsLocal History MuseumsFood Banks and PantriesSenior Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr18%27%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr15%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr18%26%20–35yr13%37%35–55yr15%20%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.5% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.5%4/827
the rest of the field
12%
4,742/38,141

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

797 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 797 of the 827 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
152
Early backer (in before they grew)
788/797
Grantees still filing
539/797
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $725,000 · OtherNORTHWEST HARVEST EMMBALLARD FOOD BANK — $509,074 · OtherBALLARD FOOD BANKWHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK — $500,000 · OtherWHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CE…BELLWETHER HOUSING — $500,000 · OtherBELLWETHER HOUSINGRAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK — $320,000 · OtherHOPEWORKS SOCIAL ENTERPRISES — $500,000 · OtherHOPEWORKS SOCIAL ENTERPRISES+81 more — $6,121,177 · Other+81 moreMULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER — $536,145 · Human ServicesMULTICULTURAL CHILD AND …THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) — $350,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIA…BYRD BARR PLACE — $253,478 · Human ServicesBYRD BARR PLACECHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON — $250,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY O…WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES — $192,015 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON — $177,439 · Human ServicesSENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $160,000 · Human ServicesNETWORK SERVICES — $160,000 · Human Services+42 more — $2,602,596 · Human Services+42 moreHOUSING HOPE — $500,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING HO…CONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS — $500,000 · Housing & ShelterCONGREGATI…PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES — $250,000 · Housing & ShelterPLYMOUTH H…COMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE — $155,164 · Housing & ShelterCOMPASS HO…Solid Ground Washington — $143,662 · Housing & ShelterSolid Grou…JUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER — $74,785 · Housing & Shelter+8 more — $372,891 · Housing & Shelter+8 moreEVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS — $550,000 · HealthEVERGREEN …COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE — $161,658 · HealthCOMMUNITY …SOUTH SEATTLE WOMENS HEALTH FOUNDAT — $125,000 · HealthSOUTH SEAT…EVERGREEN TREATMENT SERVICES — $123,969 · HealthEVERGREEN …Ronald McDonald House Charities of Western Washington & Alaska — $123,769 · HealthRonald McD…WEST SOUND TREATMENT CENTER — $119,123 · HealthWEST SOUND…Secret Harbor — $83,599 · HealthLIFELONG HEALTH FOR ALL — $80,000 · HealthKIN ON HEALTH CARE CENTER — $80,000 · HealthNORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS — $79,006 · HealthDowntown Emergency Service Center — $68,386 · HealthFRIENDS OF YOUTH — $68,200 · Health+6 more — $272,779 · Health+6 moreEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY — $500,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD LIFELINE — $375,000 · Food & NutritionGoodRoots Northwest — $130,000 · Food & NutritionTHE CHILDREN'S HUNGER PROJECT INC — $95,000 · Food & NutritionFood Bank of North Alabama Inc — $75,000 · Food & NutritionCITY FRUIT — $70,000 · Food & Nutrition+8 more — $364,000 · Food & NutritionBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $325,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP KOREY — $124,179 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SKAGIT COUNTY — $120,000 · Youth DevelopmentWASHINGTON STATE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS ASSO — $111,682 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP FIRE SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $79,527 · Youth DevelopmentHOMES FIRST — $74,680 · Youth DevelopmentCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $72,627 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP FIRE CENTRAL PUGET SOUND — $60,816 · Youth DevelopmentICAN IMPROVING CHANDLER AREA NEIGHBORHOODS — $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentWONDERLAND CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - SEATTLE — $43,500 · Youth DevelopmentA MILLION STARS INC DBA COLLEGE BOUND — $41,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentWHITE CENTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION — $495,393 · Community ImprovementFAMILYWORKS — $145,000 · Community ImprovementORION INDUSTRIES — $70,496 · Community ImprovementTECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION — $60,000 · Community Improvement
Other$9,175,251Human Services$4,681,673Housing & Shelter$1,996,502Health$1,935,489Food & Nutrition$1,609,000Youth Development$1,203,011Community Improvement$770,889

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $725,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS — $550,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetMULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER — $536,145 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetBALLARD FOOD BANK — $509,074 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetHOUSING HOPE — $500,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetHOPEWORKS SOCIAL ENTERPRISES — $500,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS — $500,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY — $500,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK — $500,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetBELLWETHER HOUSING — $500,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWHITE CENTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION — $495,393 over 1y, 14% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE — $375,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) — $350,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $325,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetRAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK — $320,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetIMAGINE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $300,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetENCOMPASS NORTHWEST — $282,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetCASA LATINA — $278,155 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetCHILDSTRIVE — $278,129 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetBYRD BARR PLACE — $253,478 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON — $250,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES — $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION — $225,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL — $198,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES — $192,015 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON — $177,439 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKINDERING CENTER — $163,526 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CARE — $161,658 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $160,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNETWORK SERVICES — $160,000 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetCOMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE — $155,164 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCHIEF SEATTLE CLUB — $154,576 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetChinese Information and Service Center — $153,170 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $146,989 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILYWORKS — $145,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetEVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST WASHINGTON — $144,601 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSolid Ground Washington — $143,662 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGoodRoots Northwest — $130,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetLINDQUIST DENTAL CLINIC FOR CHILDREN — $126,916 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetCAMP KOREY — $124,179 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetEVERGREEN TREATMENT SERVICES — $123,969 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Western Washington & Alaska — $123,769 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SKAGIT COUNTY — $120,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetWEST SOUND TREATMENT CENTER — $119,123 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetOutdoors for all Foundation — $119,119 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS ASSO — $111,682 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS — $111,656 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSOUTH PUGET SOUND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $111,459 over 3y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community FoundationMO132.3× affinity103 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Pott Foundation · Brown Dana Charitable Trust · Employees Community Fund of Boeing California Inc · Employees Community Fund of Boeing-Puget Sound · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Norman J Stupp Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Norcliffe Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 29%
  • Antfarm Inc29% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
115report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company?

Find your warmest path to Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 827 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph