Skip to content

Colorado · Nonprofit

CASA of the Pikes Peak Region

CASA of the Pikes Peak Region (Colorado) receives grants from 65 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,131,028 to it, the largest being Colorado CASA Inc ($1,375,936). 42 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$2.5M
Funders on record
65
Grants received
$4.1M
Net assets
$3.8M
42/65 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 29%
01What it does

What CASA of the Pikes Peak Region does

Mission

CASA of the Pikes Peak Region provides a volunteer's voice in court for children who are victims of abuse, neglect, or domestic conflict and promotes community awareness of these issues to ensure safe and permanent homes.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Children's Advocacy Program provides a volunteer's voice in court for children who are victims of abuse, neglect, or domestic conflict and gets them to a safe and permanent home as quickly as possible. We served 527 children in this program during FY25. 82% of our closed cases achieved permanency, 81% did not experience more than two placement moves while CASA was on the case, and 100% of the children served did not experience re-abuse or re-neglect.Continues in Schedule OThe Supervised Exchange and Parenting Time Program (SEPT) is a court ordered service to protect children from witnessing parental disputes during visits or exchanges, where program volunteers oversee visits or the transfer of children from one parent to another in conflictive custody or domestic violence cases. We served 138 children in this program during FY25. We served 91 families, completed 453 exchanges, 1,156 visits, and zero incidents were reported.The Milton Foster Children's Fund (MFCF) provides foster children with opportunities not funded through other agencies. These needs include scholarships for sports and recreation, specialized education, and unmet needs, among others. The Hanger Project, an MFCF…

    $2,128,159 spentof which $21,038 as grants$102,570 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $2,128,159.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.3M) Expenses 100 ($2.1M) Net assets 100 ($2.1M)2018 Revenue 98 ($2.3M) Expenses 97 ($2.1M) Net assets 113 ($2.3M)2019 Revenue 102 ($2.4M) Expenses 85 ($1.8M) Net assets 138 ($2.8M)2020 Revenue 74 ($1.7M) Expenses 84 ($1.8M) Net assets 130 ($2.7M)2021 Revenue 90 ($2.1M) Expenses 83 ($1.8M) Net assets 153 ($3.2M)2022 Revenue 100 ($2.3M) Expenses 89 ($1.9M) Net assets 164 ($3.4M)2023 Revenue 90 ($2.1M) Expenses 97 ($2.1M) Net assets 168 ($3.5M)2024 Revenue 98 ($2.3M) Expenses 110 ($2.3M) Net assets 169 ($3.5M)2025 Revenue 110 ($2.5M) Expenses 113 ($2.4M) Net assets 183 ($3.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (110)Expenses (113)Net assets (183)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $2.2M to $2.8M (+29%).

$2.2M
$2.8M
$2.9M
$3.0M
$3.5M
$3.6M
$3.6M
$3.6M
$4.0M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 27% · 2018 22% · 2019 19% · 2020 31% · 2021 36% · 2022 35% · 2023 29% · 2024 29% · 2025 31%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

95% of CASA of the Pikes Peak Region’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (97% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,024 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$198k
’17
$211k
’18
$556k
’19
−$74k
’20
$338k
’21
$414k
’22
$34k
’23
−$63k
’24
$143k
’25
3.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Angela Rose

Executive Director

Board chair

Michael Deen

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2017 and FY2018 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed202025232626272318
Joined·+7+5+4+3+0+9+6+6
No longer listed·7060081011
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 15 funders to 29 funders, grant income rose $224k → $608k.

11 of 65 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 19% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CASA of the Pikes Peak Region’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 65 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CASA of the Pikes Peak Region has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 33% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

72% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CASA of the Pikes Peak Region.

33%
largest funder
46%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 54% · 2018 38% · 2019 30% · 2020 29% · 2021 25% · 2022 27% · 2023 27% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

45% of CASA of the Pikes Peak Region's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 65% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

70% of CASA of the Pikes Peak Region's grant income comes from Colorado funders.

WA
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
SD
IN
OH
CA
CO
MO
MD
DE
NC
HI
AL
GA
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Colorado out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $793k arriving through sponsors registered in 9 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

CASA of the Pikes Peak Region's funding base is broadening — from 15 funders to 29 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin6% · below the median
Months of reserve3.3mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 479 civil rights nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding CASA of the Pikes Peak Region receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $550k on record.

Federal$550k
grants $550kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of Justice$550k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like CASA of the Pikes Peak Region

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Colorado

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 5%Fundraising 7%

Governance

17
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CASA of the Pikes Peak Region: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CASA of the Pikes Peak Region?
CASA of the Pikes Peak Region (Colorado) receives grants from 65 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,131,028 to it, the largest being Colorado CASA Inc ($1,375,936). 42 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CASA of the Pikes Peak Region have?
IRS filings report 65 organizations giving $4,131,028 in grants to CASA of the Pikes Peak Region, 42 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CASA of the Pikes Peak Region?
Colorado CASA Inc is the largest funder on record, with $1,375,936 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CASA of the Pikes Peak Region find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds CASA of the Pikes Peak Region →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 65 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing