· Private foundation
Brown Dana Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of BROWN DANA CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k82 grants · $1.8M
- $50k–250k17 grants · $1.2M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION | $500,000 |
| CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $485,714 |
| RANKEN JORDAN PEDIATRIC BRIDGE | $250,000 |
| ST LOUIS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $250,000 |
| THE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| ST LOUIS SYMPHONY | $110,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ST LOUIS | $101,500 |
| OPERATION FOOD SEARCH | $65,000 |
| A MILLION STARS INC | $65,000 |
| CASA OF ST LOUIS | $65,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES | $62,500 |
| CITY GARDEN MONTESSORI SCHOOL | $60,000 |
| ROOM AT THE INN | $50,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MO | $50,000 |
| NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $833k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 90 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN ST LOUIS SECTION2× · 2024–2025 · $90k · revenue +199%
- MMMARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL2× · 2024–2025 · $75k · revenue +11%
- RARoom at the Inn2× · 2024–2025 · $70k · revenue +159%
Funded once
- SLST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $250k · revenue 0%
- MHMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $200k
- TRThe Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Childrenone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue -1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.
To provide children with hope, understanding, and compassion so they can reach their full potential.
Providing day care services to infants and children of low income families in northern st. louis county, missouri
Economic development.
To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.
SLSLS provides victims of domestic violence the assistance they need in filing petitions for orders of protection and obtaining full orders of protection in court.
Community Development and Community Center and social services
Founded In 2018, Teach St. Louis (formerly St. Louis Teacher Residency) launched to improve teacher quality and retention in St. Louis, a city where 40% of new teachers exit the classroom in their first three years. Teach St. Louis…
Embracing the ferguson commission's mandate, forward through ferguson centers impacted communities and mobilizes accountable bodies to advance racially equitable systems and policies that ensure all people in the st. louis region can…
Kids Win Missouri furthers child well-being by advancing the health, education, safety and development of Missouri children and their families, especially those who are at-risk because of poverty, abuse, neglect, racial inequities or other…
Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…
Enhance the opportunities and quality of life for children and youth with disabilities. the organization achieves this objective through parent training, emotional support, direct advocacy, community education, self-advocacy and navigation…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Crisis Nursery and the most unlike its peers is Civitas Associates Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
139 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 139 of the 169 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION FOR THE BENEFIT OF ST LOUIS PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds The Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN ST LOUIS SECTION ↗
- Who funds MARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds Room at the Inn ↗
- Who funds OUR LITTLE HAVEN ↗
- Who funds OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds A MILLION STARS INC DBA COLLEGE BOUND ↗
- Who funds CASA OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds YOUTH IN NEED ↗
- Who funds CITY GARDEN MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds EMPLOYMENT CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE COACH INC ↗
- Who funds HOME WORKS - THVP ↗
- Who funds THE SOULARD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Almost Home ↗
- Who funds GREAT RIVERS GREENWAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KIDSMART INC ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds DUO DOGS INC ↗
- Who funds EarthDance ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Pott Foundation · The Bellwether Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Brown Dana Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.