Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION

TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION (Washington) receives grants from 87 organizations whose IRS filings report $19,642,112 to it, the largest being The Laura Ellen & Robert Muglia Family Foundation ($3,000,000). 44 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$4.0M
Funders on record
87
Grants received
$20M
Net assets
$11M
44/87 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 76%
01What it does

What Technology Access Foundation does

Mission

The Technology Access Foundation builds collaborative relationships with public education to create access to transformative systems of learning for students and teachers of color to eliminate race-based disparities in an increasingly diverse society.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. TAF Academy is a 6th to 12th grade public school with a mission to prepare every student for college and life through a rigorous and relevant Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) focused curriculum. The goal is to enlist students as active participants in their education and cultivate a keen awareness of their important role with-in the world. The first TAF Academy opened in Federal Way Public School District in September 2008 with 130 students. Enrollment continued to grow and in 2017-18 school year TAF moved to a new location in Federal Way, now called TAF@Saghalie, more than doubling capacity. Enrollment for 2024-25 was 532. To acclimate incoming 6th graders into our program, TAF also offers STEMbyTAF Jump Start daily camp for two weeks in the summer at both schools each year.

    $1,328,660 spentof which $3,000 as grants
    41% of program spending
  2. STEMbyTAF School Transformation is a program focused on Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) curriculum where TAF supports public schools (Kindergarten through Highschool) that are interested in transforming their academic environment to model that of our award-winning TAF Academy School. In 2024-25 there were 2,140 students at our six partner public schools in four districts (Tacoma, Federal Way, Highline and Yakima school districts) that TAF supported with this program. TAF is in planning to expand the program to other schools and districts.

    $845,748 spent
    26% of program spending
  3. Network for EdWork (NWEW) is TAF's teacher diversity entity and comprises of the Martinez Fellowship (early-career coaching, ongoing professional development, and networking opportunities for new teachers of color), Leadership (practical leadership and community building through the lens of decolonization for current and aspiring education leaders of color) which includes Ally Engagement (connecting, developing, and empowering anti-racist white leaders in education). The Martinez Fellowship was established by Edgar and Holli Martinez in 2008 as the Martinez Foundation, with a mission of improving teacher diversity. In 2015, The Martinez Foundation entrusted TAF to continue its efforts. TAF's Martinez Fellowship served 446 Fellows this year. In 2020, TAF expanded the NWEW program with focus on education leadership and community building with the Leadership program, which served 114 education leaders this year. Additionally, TAF's Academy for EDvancement focuses on teacher professional development, training and supporting 57 educators this year by hosting the 13th annual STEMbyTAF Teacher Institute as well as series of vertical courses focusing on Family and Community Engagement,…

    $1,102,080 spentof which $3,000 as grants$58,600 earned by the program
    34% of program spending
  4. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $3,276,488.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.6M) Expenses 100 ($2.1M) Net assets 100 ($11M)2018 Revenue 108 ($2.9M) Expenses 123 ($2.6M) Net assets 102 ($11M)2020 Revenue 102 ($2.7M) Expenses 131 ($2.8M) Net assets 105 ($11M)2021 Revenue 147 ($3.9M) Expenses 174 ($3.7M) Net assets 106 ($12M)2022 Revenue 134 ($3.5M) Expenses 197 ($4.2M) Net assets 100 ($11M)2023 Revenue 165 ($4.3M) Expenses 216 ($4.6M) Net assets 98 ($11M)2024 Revenue 239 ($6.3M) Expenses 216 ($4.6M) Net assets 113 ($12M)2025 Revenue 152 ($4.0M) Expenses 234 ($5.0M) Net assets 105 ($11M)
'17'18'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (152)Expenses (234)Net assets (105)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $11M to $13M (+14%).

$11M
$11M
$12M
$12M
$12M
$11M
$13M
$12M
'17'18'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 0% · 2018 0% · 2020 0% · 2021 15% · 2022 25% · 2023 13% · 2024 6% · 2025 5%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

105% of TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (60% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,444 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$504k
’17
$225k
’18
−$112k
’20
$175k
’21
−$678k
’22
−$253k
’23
$1.7M
’24
−$974k
’25
1.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed1715232222212322
Joined·+2·+5+4+3+7+5
No longer listed·4·64456
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 22 funders to 32 funders, grant income rose $637k → $2.3M.

17 of 87 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 50% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 87 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 15% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

63% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION.

15%
largest funder
41%
top three
~12
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 39% · 2018 31% · 2019 42% · 2020 33% · 2021 24% · 2022 36% · 2023 21% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

45% of TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 51% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION draws 55% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, across 17 states in all.

AK
WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
NJ
CA
MO
DE
NC
DC
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $9.8M arriving through sponsors registered in 13 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION's funding base is broadening — from 22 funders to 32 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−24% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve1.8mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)5% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,299 community improvement nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

66% of spending goes to programs.

Program 66%Management 15%Fundraising 19%

Governance

15
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

68%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION?
TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION (Washington) receives grants from 87 organizations whose IRS filings report $19,642,112 to it, the largest being The Laura Ellen & Robert Muglia Family Foundation ($3,000,000). 44 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 87 organizations giving $19,642,112 in grants to TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION, 44 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION?
The Laura Ellen & Robert Muglia Family Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $3,000,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Technology Access →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 87 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing