Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

CHILDSTRIVE

CHILDSTRIVE (Washington) receives grants from 46 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,431,340 to it, the largest being Community Foundation of Snohomish County ($1,154,466). 25 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$11M
Funders on record
46
Grants received
$4.4M
Net assets
$6.1M
25/46 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 14%
01What it does

What Childstrive does

Mission

Childstrive builds on the relationships, strengths, and unique abilities of young children and their families by fostering social, emotional, and physical well-being so all children can flourish.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Early support for infants and toddlers (esit): this program supports children under the age of three who have a diagnosis or developmental delays or disabilities. Services are delivered in close partnership with families and caregivers, recognizing them as their child's most important teacher and advocate. A transdisciplinary team of developmental specialists - including educators, physical and occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, counselors, and family resource coordinators - works with families in their natural environments, such as homes and childcare settings. Services are tailored to meet each family's unique strengths, routines, and goals, helping ensure children are on a strong path toward future learning and lifelong well-being.

    $5,334,242 spent$386,330 earned by the program
    62% of program spending
  2. Nurse-family partnership (nfp): nfp is a nationally recognized, evidence-based home visiting program for first-time parents, beginning in pregnancy and continuing until the child's second birthday. Families are paired with specially trained nurses who provide consistent, inhome support focused on healthy pregnancies, child development, and family self-sufficiency.

    $1,314,276 spentof which $81,294 as grants
    15% of program spending
  3. Parents as teachers (pat): pat is a national, evidence-based home visiting model supporting families with children from prenatal through kindergarten entry. Childstrive's pat program serves families navigating multiple, often compounding challenges, including housing instability, trauma, and systemic barriers to healthcare, education, and economic opportunity. The program promotes positive parent-child interactions, early learning, and healthy development through regularly scheduled home visits tailored to each family's goals and cultural context.

    $644,368 spentof which $65,970 as grants
    7% of program spending
  4. Early childhood education and assistance program (eceap): eceap is washington state's comprehensive, pre-kindergarten program for three and four-year-olds from lowincome families. It prepares children for kindergarten by supporting their health, nutrition, social-emotional growth, and early learning. The program is grounded in whole-child development and aligned with national best practices.outreach support services: this program offers therapeutic, culturally responsive, early relational health interventions in homes, preschools, and community settings. Counselors work with families during the prenatal period and through early childhood to address trauma, social isolation, substance use recovery, intimate partner violence, and other factors that can affect child development and family well-being. This program helps families strengthen relationships, cope with complex stressors, reduce the risk of child welfare involvement, and prepare children to thrive in kindergarten and beyond.

    $1,359,034 spentof which $43,263 as grants$114,787 earned by the program
    16% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $8,651,920.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($4.8M) Expenses 100 ($5.0M) Net assets 100 ($2.8M)2018 Revenue 131 ($6.2M) Expenses 125 ($6.2M) Net assets 101 ($2.8M)2019 Revenue 172 ($8.2M) Expenses 160 ($7.9M) Net assets 112 ($3.1M)2020 Revenue 196 ($9.3M) Expenses 192 ($9.5M) Net assets 105 ($2.9M)2021 Revenue 191 ($9.1M) Expenses 178 ($8.8M) Net assets 115 ($3.2M)2022 Revenue 250 ($12M) Expenses 187 ($9.3M) Net assets 204 ($5.6M)2023 Revenue 223 ($11M) Expenses 213 ($11M) Net assets 211 ($5.8M)2024 Revenue 215 ($10M) Expenses 213 ($11M) Net assets 205 ($5.7M)2025 Revenue 226 ($11M) Expenses 211 ($10M) Net assets 222 ($6.1M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (226)Expenses (211)Net assets (222)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $3.9M to $5.3M (+37%).

$3.4M
$3.5M
$3.9M
$5.3M
$6.5M
$6.2M
$6.6M
$7.0M
$7.7M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 39% · 2018 7% · 2019 8% · 2020 7% · 2021 11% · 2022 30% · 2023 86% · 2024 87% · 2025 84%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$204k
’17
$31k
’18
$274k
’19
−$187k
’20
$244k
’21
$2.6M
’22
$72k
’23
−$325k
’24
$288k
’25
0.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Mary Cline-Stively

CEO

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed131215151413141516
Joined·+2+4+3+2+4+4+4+3
No longer listed·31335332
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 8 funders to 18 funders, grant income fell $653k → $367k.

10 of 46 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 41% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CHILDSTRIVE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 46 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CHILDSTRIVE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 26% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

86% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CHILDSTRIVE.

26%
largest funder
49%
top three
~9
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 80% · 2018 28% · 2019 68% · 2020 47% · 2021 19% · 2022 59% · 2023 27% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

28% of CHILDSTRIVE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 54% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

63% of CHILDSTRIVE's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
IL
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
DE
KS

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.8M arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like CHILDSTRIVE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 14%Fundraising 3%

Governance

12
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CHILDSTRIVE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CHILDSTRIVE?
CHILDSTRIVE (Washington) receives grants from 46 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,431,340 to it, the largest being Community Foundation of Snohomish County ($1,154,466). 25 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CHILDSTRIVE have?
IRS filings report 46 organizations giving $4,431,340 in grants to CHILDSTRIVE, 25 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CHILDSTRIVE?
Community Foundation of Snohomish County is the largest funder on record, with $1,154,466 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CHILDSTRIVE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Childstrive →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 46 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing