Skip to content
Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company

To proactively involve boeing employees in support of community services where they live and work.

$5.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
264
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$320k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$7.3MFood & Nutrition$4.7MHealth$4.6MHousing & Shelter$4.6MYouth Development$2.0MEducation$1.6MEmployment$1.6MArts & Culture$1.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 264 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 264 grants below total $5,038,583, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,768,774 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $730,191 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k52 grants · $372k
  • $10k–50k196 grants · $3.6M
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $775k
  • $250k+1 grant · $320k
$12,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK$320,000
SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION$75,000
SKAGIT GLEANERS$50,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KITSAP COUNTY$50,000
ALTERNATIVES TO HUNGER$50,000
WEST SEATTLE FOOD BANK$50,000
EDMONDS FOOD BANK$50,000
WHATCOM FAMILY YMCA$50,000
SOUTH PUGET SOUND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$50,000
EVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS$50,000
WONDERLAND CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES$50,000
SUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT INC$50,000
BONNEY LAKE COMMUNITY RESOURCES$50,000
TERRY HOME$50,000
BABIES OF HOMELESSNESS$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $6.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WESTSIDE BABY: $40k → 9%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $40k → 9%NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $40k → 12%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $40k → 11%NETWORK TACOMA: $40k → 12%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $40k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF SOUTH SOUND: $39k → 9%WHATCOM FAMILY YMCA: $40k → 12%SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE: $40k → 9%KEY PENINSULA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50k → 9%SENIOR SERVICES ISLAND COUNTY: $40k → 7%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $40k → 9%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $40k → 9%STILLAGUAMISH SENIOR CENTER: $40k → 9%MARTHA & MARY HEALTH SERVICES: $40k → 10%MONROE COMMUNITY SENIOR CENTER: $40k → 9%KITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $40k → 10%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NW: $40k → 9%THE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT OF KEY PENINSULA: $40k → 16%MULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER: $500k → 9%ALPHA SUPPORTED LIVING SERVICES: $40k → 9%BYRD BARR PLACE: $253k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $40k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $40k → 9%GENERATIONS WITH PRIDE: $40k → 9%YWCA OF SEATTLE-KING COUNTY-SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $40k → 9%MILLIONAIR CLUB INC: $40k → 9%HOMELESS HEALTH CARE LOS ANGELES: $41k → 14%LIFEWIRE FORMERLY EASTSIDE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROGRAM: $40k → 9%ELIZABETH GREGORY HOME: $50k → 11%SOUTHWEST YOUTH & FAM SERVICES: $46k → 9%SOUTHWEST YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $40k → 9%PARKVIEW SERVICES: $40k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $192k → 9%CATHOLIC CMTY SRVS OF WEST WA: $177k → 9%DOWN SYNDROME COMMUNITY OF PUGET SOUND: $40k → 9%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON: $250k → 9%ABUSED DEAF WOMENS ADVOCACY SERVICES: $40k → 9%HOPELINK: $40k → 9%PIONEER HUMAN SERVICES: $40k → 9%DOMESTIC ABUSE WOMENS NETWORK: $46k → 9%ATWORK: $40k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $40k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $350k → 9%FACING HOMELESSNESS: $40k → 9%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $155k → 9%CHINESE INFORMATION AND SERVICE CENTER: $132k → 9%ISSAQUAH FOOD & CLOTHING BANK: $40k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
SC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 294 repeat orgs$15M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

294 repeat relationships: 150 still active in FY2024, 144 since wound down; 111 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

294
420

Total granted

$16M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+20%

Still filing today

98%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ER
    EVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS
    2× · 2022–2024 · $550k · revenue +3%
  • MC
    MULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER
    2× · 2020–2023 · $536k · revenue +453%
  • BALLARD FOOD BANK
    2× · 2021–2023 · $509k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • HH
    HOUSING HOPE
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -13%
  • HS
    HOPEWORKS SOCIAL ENTERPRISES
    one grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue +25%
  • CF
    CONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
2
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services
3
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
4
Cornerhouse

The mission of cornerhouse is to partner with families, communities, and systems - entrusted with the safety of children, youth and vulnerable adults - to reduce trauma and end abuse.

Crime & Legal
5
Family Solutions Inc

Family solutions is a community based, comprehensive behavioral health provider cultivating the wellness of southwest washington by offering hope and health to children, youth and families.

Health
6
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
7
Connections for Life

Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.

Health
8
Compass Family Services

Compass family services helps homeless families and those at imminent risk to achieve housing stability, economic self-sufficiency, and well-being.

Human Services
9
Washington Vocational Services

To provide job development, job seeking skills and job placement for persons with disabilities. we are dedicated to providing outstanding quality services that result in successful community involvement and employment for persons with…

Employment
10
South Peninsula Behavioral Health Services Inc

The organization operates primarily on the Southern Kenai Peninsula and its operations include the following:Community Mental Health - Counseling, evaluation, consultation and crisis mental health services for Adults and…

Health
11
Senior Life Resources Northwest

To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.

Human Services
12
Trivium Life Services

Behavioral health, long-term support services, mental health therapy, substance, alcohol and drug abuse treatment as well as domestic violence offender intervention services

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Live and Learn Program; the most unlike its peers is St Lou Fringe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

797 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 797 of the 827 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
157
Early backer (in before they grew)
789/797
Grantees still filing
545/797
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $725,000 · OtherNORTHWEST HARVEST EMMBALLARD FOOD BANK: $509,074 · OtherBALLARD FOOD BANKWHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK: $500,000 · OtherWHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CE…BELLWETHER HOUSING: $500,000 · OtherBELLWETHER HOUSINGRAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK: $320,000 · OtherHOPEWORKS SOCIAL ENTERPRISES: $500,000 · OtherHOPEWORKS SOCIAL ENTERPRISES+81 more: $6,121,177 · Other+81 moreMULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER: $536,145 · Human ServicesMULTICULTURAL CHILD AND …THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $350,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIA…BYRD BARR PLACE: $253,478 · Human ServicesBYRD BARR PLACECHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON: $250,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY O…WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $192,015 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $177,439 · Human ServicesSENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $160,000 · Human ServicesNETWORK SERVICES: $160,000 · Human Services+42 more: $2,602,596 · Human Services+42 moreHOUSING HOPE: $500,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING HO…CONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS: $500,000 · Housing & ShelterCONGREGATI…PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES: $250,000 · Housing & ShelterPLYMOUTH H…COMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE: $155,164 · Housing & ShelterCOMPASS HO…Solid Ground Washington: $143,662 · Housing & ShelterSolid Grou…JUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER: $74,785 · Housing & Shelter+8 more: $372,891 · Housing & Shelter+8 moreEVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS: $550,000 · HealthEVERGREEN …COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE: $161,658 · HealthCOMMUNITY …SOUTH SEATTLE WOMENS HEALTH FOUNDAT: $125,000 · HealthSOUTH SEAT…EVERGREEN TREATMENT SERVICES: $123,969 · HealthEVERGREEN …Ronald McDonald House Charities of Western Washington & Alaska: $123,769 · HealthRonald McD…WEST SOUND TREATMENT CENTER: $119,123 · HealthWEST SOUND…Secret Harbor: $83,599 · HealthLIFELONG HEALTH FOR ALL: $80,000 · HealthKIN ON HEALTH CARE CENTER: $80,000 · HealthNORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS: $79,006 · HealthDowntown Emergency Service Center: $68,386 · HealthFRIENDS OF YOUTH: $68,200 · Health+6 more: $272,779 · Health+6 moreEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY: $500,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD LIFELINE: $375,000 · Food & NutritionGoodRoots Northwest: $130,000 · Food & NutritionTHE CHILDREN'S HUNGER PROJECT INC: $95,000 · Food & NutritionFood Bank of North Alabama Inc: $75,000 · Food & NutritionCITY FRUIT: $70,000 · Food & Nutrition+8 more: $364,000 · Food & NutritionBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $325,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP KOREY: $124,179 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $120,000 · Youth DevelopmentWASHINGTON STATE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS ASSO: $111,682 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP FIRE SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $79,527 · Youth DevelopmentHOMES FIRST: $74,680 · Youth DevelopmentCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $72,627 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP FIRE CENTRAL PUGET SOUND: $60,816 · Youth DevelopmentICAN IMPROVING CHANDLER AREA NEIGHBORHOODS: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentWONDERLAND CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - SEATTLE: $43,500 · Youth DevelopmentA MILLION STARS INC DBA COLLEGE BOUND: $41,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentWHITE CENTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $495,393 · Community ImprovementFAMILYWORKS: $145,000 · Community ImprovementORION INDUSTRIES: $70,496 · Community ImprovementTECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Community Improvement
Other$9,175,251Human Services$4,681,673Housing & Shelter$1,996,502Health$1,935,489Food & Nutrition$1,609,000Youth Development$1,203,011Community Improvement$770,889

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $725,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS: $550,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetMULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER: $536,145 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetBALLARD FOOD BANK: $509,074 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetHOUSING HOPE: $500,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetHOPEWORKS SOCIAL ENTERPRISES: $500,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS: $500,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY: $500,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK: $500,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetBELLWETHER HOUSING: $500,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWHITE CENTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $495,393 over 1y, 14% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $375,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $350,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $325,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetRAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK: $320,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetIMAGINE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $300,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetENCOMPASS NORTHWEST: $282,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetCASA LATINA: $278,155 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetCHILDSTRIVE: $278,129 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetBYRD BARR PLACE: $253,478 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON: $250,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES: $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $225,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $198,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $192,015 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $177,439 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKINDERING CENTER: $163,526 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CARE: $161,658 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $160,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNETWORK SERVICES: $160,000 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetCOMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE: $155,164 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $154,576 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetChinese Information and Service Center: $153,170 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $146,989 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILYWORKS: $145,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetEVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST WASHINGTON: $144,601 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSolid Ground Washington: $143,662 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGoodRoots Northwest: $130,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetLINDQUIST DENTAL CLINIC FOR CHILDREN: $126,916 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetCAMP KOREY: $124,179 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetEVERGREEN TREATMENT SERVICES: $123,969 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Western Washington & Alaska: $123,769 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $120,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetWEST SOUND TREATMENT CENTER: $119,123 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetOutdoors for all Foundation: $119,119 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS ASSO: $111,682 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS: $111,656 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSOUTH PUGET SOUND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $111,459 over 3y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Fo…United Way of Greater…Pott FoundationBrown Dana Charitable…Employees Community F…Employees Community F…Trio Foundation of St…Youthbridge Community…Norman J Stupp Founda…St Louis Community Fo…The Norcliffe Foundat…Moneta Group Charitab…
St Louis Community FoundationMO132.3× affinity103 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Pott Foundation · Brown Dana Charitable Trust · Employees Community Fund of Boeing California Inc · Employees Community Fund of Boeing-Puget Sound · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Norman J Stupp Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Norcliffe Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Antfarm Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
115report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company?

Find your warmest path to Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 827 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home