Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

WHITEWATER AQUATICS MANAGEMENT

WHITEWATER AQUATICS MANAGEMENT (Washington) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $180,031 to it, the largest being EMPLOYEES COMMUNITY FUND OF THE BOEING COMPANY ($53,030). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$677k
Funders on record
10
Grants received
$180k
Net assets
$350k
3/10 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%
01What it does

What Whitewater Aquatics Management does

Mission

Whitewater Aquatics Management was formed to reopen the evergreen pool, a community swimming pool that was closed due to budget issues in king county, washington. Our goal is to keep this pool and possibly other pools in the future open to our local community to support the health and wellness of the community and to promote water safety for everyone.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. We are a community pool that offers swim lessons and public swim to all ages and abilities. Many different groups use our pool including local high school swim teams, youth swim clubs, the ms society, union gospel mission, rain city water polo, blue wave aquatics (a masters swim team), triathlon groups, and a group that offers scuba lessons.

    $772,409 spent$507,226 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $772,409.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($362k) Expenses 100 ($361k) Net assets 100 ($76k)2018 Revenue 124 ($449k) Expenses 101 ($362k) Net assets 214 ($162k)2019 Revenue 210 ($761k) Expenses 191 ($690k) Net assets 308 ($233k)2020 Revenue 85 ($306k) Expenses 110 ($395k) Net assets 190 ($143k)2021 Revenue 144 ($521k) Expenses 118 ($424k) Net assets 318 ($241k)2022 Revenue 151 ($545k) Expenses 171 ($618k) Net assets 221 ($167k)2023 Revenue 203 ($735k) Expenses 161 ($581k) Net assets 425 ($321k)2024 Revenue 240 ($870k) Expenses 179 ($647k) Net assets 720 ($544k)2025 Revenue 187 ($677k) Expenses 242 ($871k) Net assets 463 ($350k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (187)Expenses (242)Net assets (463)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $350k to $591k (+69%).

$76k
$171k
$238k
$220k
$270k
$198k
$350k
$591k
$395k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 42% · 2018 41% · 2019 50% · 2020 49% · 2021 29% · 2022 26% · 2023 57% · 2024 42% · 2025 22%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

25% of WHITEWATER AQUATICS MANAGEMENT’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (18% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 16,168 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$1k
’17
$86k
’18
$71k
’19
−$89k
’20
$97k
’21
−$74k
’22
$154k
’23
$223k
’24
−$194k
’25
0.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed888661010811
Joined·+2+4+1+0+5+0+0+4
No longer listed·24301021
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 5 funders, grant income rose $3k → $56k.

3 of 10 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 15% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WHITEWATER AQUATICS MANAGEMENT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WHITEWATER AQUATICS MANAGEMENT has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 29% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

78% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WHITEWATER AQUATICS MANAGEMENT.

29%
largest funder
66%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2020 60% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 43% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

25% of WHITEWATER AQUATICS MANAGEMENT's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 30% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

WHITEWATER AQUATICS MANAGEMENT draws 65% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, across 5 states in all.

WA
IL
NY
CO
DE

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’20
’21
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $27k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

WHITEWATER AQUATICS MANAGEMENT has grown faster than half of the 10,453 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−29% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.4mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)8% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 10,453 recreation & sports nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like WHITEWATER AQUATICS MANAGEMENT

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

89% of spending goes to programs.

Program 89%Management 11%Fundraising 0%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WHITEWATER AQUATICS MANAGEMENT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WHITEWATER AQUATICS MANAGEMENT?
WHITEWATER AQUATICS MANAGEMENT (Washington) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $180,031 to it, the largest being EMPLOYEES COMMUNITY FUND OF THE BOEING COMPANY ($53,030). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WHITEWATER AQUATICS MANAGEMENT have?
IRS filings report 10 organizations giving $180,031 in grants to WHITEWATER AQUATICS MANAGEMENT, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WHITEWATER AQUATICS MANAGEMENT?
EMPLOYEES COMMUNITY FUND OF THE BOEING COMPANY is the largest funder on record, with $53,030 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WHITEWATER AQUATICS MANAGEMENT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Whitewater Aquatics Management →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 10 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing