Missouri · Nonprofit
JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP
JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP (Missouri) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,316,623 to it, the largest being JEFFERSON FOUNDATION ($1,047,380). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 6,426 community improvement nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,426 community improvement nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Pott Foundationshared funders
- Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trustportfolio match
- Caring Communities Incportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 58% · 2018 58% · 2020 69% · 2021 64% · 2022 67% · 2023 64% · 2024 73% · 2025 70%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
94% of JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (62% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $200k → $205k.
1 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP leans on a few funders — its largest provides 80% of grant income and the top three 94%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 96% · 2019 92% · 2020 84% · 2021 72% · 2022 82% · 2023 49% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
75% of JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 67% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
97% of JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP's grant income comes from Missouri funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $253 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 9 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Pott Foundationshared fundersMN · backs 82 organizations that share your funders
- Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Caring Communities Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Cragin Joy Spiva Charitable Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Harry and Helena Messick Charitable Trportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Liberty Hospital Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Heartland Regional Medical Centerportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Allen P and Josephine B Greenportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United Way of Central Missouri Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Jean Jack and Mildred Lemons Charitable Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ssm Health Care St Louisportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Freeman Health Systemportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Missouri
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
96% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
83%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP?
- JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP (Missouri) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,316,623 to it, the largest being JEFFERSON FOUNDATION ($1,047,380). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP have?
- IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $1,316,623 in grants to JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP?
- JEFFERSON FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,047,380 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Missouri. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 9funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing