· Private foundation
Pott Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k32 grants · $178k
- $10k–50k47 grants · $797k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $435k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-ST LOUIS | $90,000 |
| URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN SAINT LOUIS | $85,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI | $85,000 |
| WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS | $75,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF | $50,000 |
| CARONDELET COMMUNITY BETTERMENT FEDERATI | $50,000 |
| SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY | $40,000 |
| RANKEN- JORDAN HOME FOR - | $40,000 |
| ST LOUIS AREA FOODBANK INC | $40,000 |
| OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC | $35,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $35,000 |
| ST PATRICK CENTER | $30,000 |
| CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER | $30,000 |
| SAINT LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY | $30,000 |
| FOOD OUTREACH INC | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
127 repeat relationships — 76 still active in FY2025, 51 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $223k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SLST LOUIS MERCANTILE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION5× · 2020–2024 · $440k · revenue +16%
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY6× · 2020–2025 · $420k · revenue +16%- OFOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC6× · 2020–2025 · $268k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $88k
- GHGRACE HILL SETTLEMENT HOUSEone grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue 0%
- ULURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUISone grant, 2024 · $60k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.
To provide children with hope, understanding, and compassion so they can reach their full potential.
Providing day care services to infants and children of low income families in northern st. louis county, missouri
To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.
To empower adults and families to become independent and permanently housed. the organization provides shelter, food, and other life sustaining materials and activities for destitute families, children and the homeless in the city of st.…
High quality, 24/7 support in neighborhood homes for persons with intellectual disabilities. inclusive educational opportunities for people in st. louis. changing the way persons with disabilities are seen and highlighting their…
To enable individuals with developmental disabilities to achieve the highest level of independent living and live a full and enriched life.
Economic development.
It is the mission of sinnissippi centers, inc. to provide quality, coordinated and responsive behavioral healthcare services to individuals, families and the communities we serve.
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
As an active partner, leader and catalyst, we will assist african americans, other minority groups and the disadvantaged attain social and economic equality and stability through direct services and advocacy.
Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Crisis Nursery and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
116 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 116 of the 164 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS MERCANTILE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ST PATRICK CENTER ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY ↗
- Who funds Carondelet Community Betterment Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds FOOD OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds GUARDIAN ANGEL SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
- Who funds Ranken Technical College ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI GIRLS TOWN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI St Louis ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds CITY ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds MARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds A MILLION STARS INC DBA COLLEGE BOUND ↗
- Who funds EMMAUS HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds GRACE HILL SETTLEMENT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds The German St Vincent Orphan Association ↗
- Who funds AIM HIGH ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds MEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds UNLEASHING POTENTIAL ↗
- Who funds MIRIAM FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · St Louis Community Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Norman J Stupp Foundation · Brown Dana Charitable Trust · World Wide Technology Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · St Louis Philanthropic Organization · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pott Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Pott Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Pott Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.