· Public charity
America's Charities
AMERICA'S CHARITIES provides charities with financial support through workplace giving and additional paths.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 889 grants below total $18,908,017 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $49,677,170 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $30,769,153 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k461 grants · $3.2M
- $10k–50k356 grants · $6.8M
- $50k–250k66 grants · $6.0M
- $250k+6 grants · $3.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IDENTITY THEFT RESOURCE | $1,379,226 |
| CHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES | $442,710 |
| AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION | $337,929 |
| FEEDING AMERICA | $291,977 |
| CORRECTIONAL PROFESSIONALS ASSISTANCE F | $281,925 |
| SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER | $255,664 |
| PLAY WITHOUT LIMITS PROJECT | $221,012 |
| NORTH TEXAS COMMUNITY FDN | $188,698 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN NJ | $187,746 |
| AMERICA'S BEST CHARITIES | $187,034 |
| FEED THE CHILDREN | $160,429 |
| GA DEPT OF ADMIN SVCS | $142,001 |
| NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUN | $141,927 |
| WETA (GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TE | $141,332 |
| WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT | $132,684 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $10.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
1021 repeat relationships — 520 still active in FY2024, 501 since wound down; 297 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $4.2M · revenue +102%- SPSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +10%
Feeding America8× · 2017–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +84%
Funded once
- FIFORKIDS INCone grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue -18%
- WAWORLDS AQUARIUMone grant, 2022 · $331k
PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $215k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.
The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Worlds Aquarium. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1535 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1535 of the 1,938 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds CHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAS BEST CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Aero Cares ↗
- Who funds IDENTITY THEFT RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HEART OF FLORIDA UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE DALLAS REGIONINC ↗
- Who funds FORKIDS INC ↗
- Who funds DALLAS CASA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds LOCKHEED MARTIN EMPLOYEE CHARITY FUND ↗
- Who funds Global Impact ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Employees' Federated Community Service ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CORRECTIONAL PROFESSIONALS ASSISTANCE FUND OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
- Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds AARP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Arizona Humane Society ↗
- Who funds RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds DIABETES RESEARCH AND WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds PETSMART CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
- Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · The Morris Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania · United Way of Tarrant County · Sid W Richardson Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Amon G Carter Foundation · Give Back Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization America's Charities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Food Bank of South Jersey Inc — 30% of income from government
- The House of Ruth Maryland Inc — 19% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- Helping Up Mission Inc — 6% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- United Way of Marion County Inc — 4% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
- Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
- Manna Food Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- United Way of Brevard County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Heart of Florida United Way Inc — 0% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc — 0% of income from government
- Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
- University of Maryland Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.