California · Nonprofit
VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES COUNCIL
VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES COUNCIL (California) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $246,068 to it, the largest being The Community Foundation ($149,742). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 61% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Chc Creating Healthier Communitiesshared funders
- Southeast Missouri Area Agency on Aging Incportfolio match
- Meals on Wheels Americaportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2020 79% · 2021 74% · 2022 78% · 2023 89% · 2024 73% · 2025 85%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income rose $26k → $33k.
1 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 61% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES COUNCIL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES COUNCIL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 61% of grant income and the top three 87%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
89% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES COUNCIL.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 77% · 2018 63% · 2019 57% · 2020 78% · 2021 53% · 2022 75% · 2023 73% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
61% of VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES COUNCIL's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $96k that is directly attributable, 54% of it comes from California funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $150k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Chc Creating Healthier Communitiesshared fundersVA · backs 45 organizations that share your funders
- Southeast Missouri Area Agency on Aging Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Meals on Wheels Americaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Northeast Missouri Area Agency on Agingportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Western Illinois Area Agency on Agingportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Home Instead Charitiesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Area Agency on Aging for North Floridaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ten County Aging Board Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Balin Hildegard Charit Tua-Mainportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Bethlehem Foundation - Agy Mainportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Champions Volunteer Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Swift Memorial Health Care Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES COUNCIL
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
83% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES COUNCIL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES COUNCIL?
- VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES COUNCIL (California) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $246,068 to it, the largest being The Community Foundation ($149,742). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 61% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES COUNCIL have?
- IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $246,068 in grants to VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES COUNCIL, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES COUNCIL?
- The Community Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $149,742 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES COUNCIL find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing