Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Give Back Foundation

To encourage more giving.

$44M
Granted FY2025still arriving
639
Grants FY2025still arriving
51
States reached
$6.4M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Philanthropy$106MHealth$96MHuman Services$47MInternational$34MAnimals$31MPublic Safety & Disaster$26MEnvironment$18MFood & Nutrition$17MOther$0
02FY2025 · 639 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 639 grants below total $40,120,283 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $43,707,348 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,587,065 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k357 grants · $2.5M
  • $10k–50k228 grants · $4.3M
  • $50k–250k30 grants · $3.5M
  • $250k+24 grants · $30M
$9,066
Median grant
51
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES$6,384,949
UNITED WAY OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA$3,873,964
AMERICA'S BEST CHARITIES$2,945,281
AMERICA'S CHARITIES$1,967,403
GLOBAL IMPACT$1,597,852
HEALTH AND MEDICAL RESEARCH CHARITIES OF AMERICA$1,563,859
ANIMAL CHARITIES OF AMERICA$1,320,206
EARTHSHARE$1,118,051
CHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES LOCAL$1,087,114
MILITARY FAMILY AND VETERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICA$987,973
CHRISTIAN CHARITIES USA$911,907
COMMUNITY FIRST - AMERICA'S CHARITIES$896,993
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$881,957
AMERICA'S BEST LOCAL CHARITIES$703,600
CONSERVE NOW(CONSERVATION AND PRESERVATION CHARITIES OF AMERICA)$569,330
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $14.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ROGER L VON AMELUNXEN FOUNDATION INC: $151k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $536k → 14%CARING CONNECTION INC: $66k → 15%ROGER L VON AMELUNXEN FOUNDATION INC: $134k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $519k → 14%ROGER L VON AMELUNXEN FOUNDATION INC: $91k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $452k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $395k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC: $75k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $383k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC: $55k → 12%ROGER L VON AMELUNXEN FOUNDATION INC: $138k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $333k → 14%PRE-BORN INC (MISSION PRE-BORN INC): $51k → 16%ROGER L VON AMELUNXEN FOUNDATION INC: $129k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $331k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC: $82k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $288k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC: $76k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC: $69k → 12%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $45k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC: $69k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC: $59k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC: $56k → 12%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $55k → 11%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $58k → 19%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $53k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF BALTIMORE (ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC): $49k → 19%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $47k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $46k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $45k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $45k → 14%FEDERAL EMPLOYEE EDUCATION & ASSISTANCE FUND: $57k → 9%FEDERAL EMPLOYEE EDUCATION & ASSISTANCE FUND: $49k → 9%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $41k → 14%FEDERAL EMPLOYEE EDUCATION AND ASSISTANCE FUND: $47k → 9%FEDERAL EMPLOYEE EDUCATION AND ASSISTANCE FUND: $45k → 9%UNITED HELP UKRAINE: $140k → 6%UNITED HELP UKRAINE: $106k → 6%UNITED HELP UKRAINE: $106k → 6%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $1.1M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $1.0M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $909k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $900k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $896k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $882k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $849k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $75k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$354M · 1084 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

1084 repeat relationships — 568 still active in FY2025, 516 since wound down; 60 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1084
278

Total granted

$354M
$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+22%

Still filing today

88%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $407k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AMERICA'S CHARITIES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $18M · revenue +116%
  • CC
    CHRISTIAN CHARITIES USA
    8× · 2018–2025 · $9.0M · revenue +18% · 95% of their budget
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7.6M · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $295k · revenue +30%
  • SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $81k · revenue +101%
  • ZC
    ZION CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $81k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
3
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
4
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
5
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
6
Shelter From the Storm Animal Rescue Inc

Reduce the euthanasia rate of healthy and adoptable animals and improve the lives of companion animals by finding permanent homes for animals in need, providing support to communities who do not have access to humane organizations,…

—
7
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
8
CAUSE4PAWS Pet Food Bank

Many seniors and veterans share their only meal of the day with their companion animals. we deliver pet food for these precious animals so they can remain at home or with their person and not have to be surrendered to shelters.

Animals
9
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
10
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
11
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
12
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Leashes End Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and PantriesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Animal Rescue and ShelterPolicy Research and AdvocacyUnited Way AffiliatesEnvironmental Conservation …Community FoundationsPregnancy Support ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportAffordable Housing Construc…Senior Support ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Lgbtq+ Community SupportYouth Development CentersDomestic Violence ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community College Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Addiction Recovery ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Elementary Literacy TutoringPublic Library OperationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsCancer Support ServicesCommunity Arts CentersYouth Mentoring ProgramsCommunity Food PantriesEquine Therapy ProgramsFaith-Based Social ServicesSchool District FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Immigrant Worker SupportLocal Food System Organizat…Youth Sports ProgramsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%51%35–55yr16%10%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%15/1,436
the rest of the field
13%
240,381/1,818,129

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

1330 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1330 of the 1,436 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

82
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
263
Early backer (in before they grew)
1254/1330
Grantees still filing
906/1330
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA — $40,461,960 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREAAMERICAS BEST CHARITIES — $22,429,212 · PhilanthropyAMERICAS BEST CHARITIESHEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH CHARITIES OF AMERICA — $16,244,716 · PhilanthropyHEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH CHARITIES OF AM…COMMUNITY FIRST - AMERICA'S CHARITIES — $8,964,474 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FIRST - AMERICA'S CHARITIESCHRISTIAN CHARITIES USA — $8,960,991 · PhilanthropyCHRISTIAN CHARITIES USAAMERICAS BEST LOCAL CHARITIES — $6,501,035 · PhilanthropyCONSERVATION & PRESERVATION CHARITIES OF AMERICA DBA CONSERVE NOW — $5,895,048 · PhilanthropyMILITARY SUPPORT GROUPS OF AMERICA — $5,609,761 · Philanthropy+29 more — $20,836,176 · Philanthropy+29 moreCHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES — $50,659,949 · OtherCHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIESAMERICA'S CHARITIES — $18,122,583 · OtherAMERICA'S CHARITIESMILITARY FAMILY AND VETERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICA — $12,448,115 · OtherMILITARY FAMILY AND VETERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATIO…CHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES LOCAL — $10,804,443 · OtherCHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES LOCALCHRISTIAN SERVICE CHARITIES INC — $6,880,924 · Other+90 more — $57,720,525 · Other+90 moreGlobal Impact — $20,416,848 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $1,530,272 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $794,329 · International+3 more — $409,980 · InternationalANIMAL CHARITIES OF AMERICA — $14,648,938 · AnimalsANIMAL WELFARE FUND INC — $1,507,599 · Animals+14 more — $3,282,889 · AnimalsAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $7,574,140 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $3,257,826 · Human ServicesROGER L VON AMELUNXEN FOUNDATION INC — $698,442 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC — $540,875 · Human Services+10 more — $2,451,060 · Human ServicesEARTHSHARE — $11,175,181 · Environment+2 more — $369,960 · EnvironmentATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $502,345 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $494,014 · Food & NutritionREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC — $408,613 · Food & NutritionHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $395,028 · Food & NutritionROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC — $387,816 · Food & NutritionPhilabundance — $337,658 · Food & NutritionVIRGINIA PENINSULA FOODBANK — $307,930 · Food & NutritionANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $307,226 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $306,386 · Food & NutritionFood Bank of North Alabama Inc — $280,376 · Food & Nutrition+19 more — $3,420,647 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$135,903,373Other$156,636,539International$23,151,429Animals$19,439,426Human Services$14,522,343Environment$11,545,141Food & Nutrition$7,148,039

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES — $50,659,949 over 8y, 37% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA — $40,461,960 over 8y, 23% of budgetAMERICAS BEST CHARITIES — $22,429,212 over 8y, 57% of budgetGlobal Impact — $20,416,848 over 8y, 5.2% of budgetAMERICA'S CHARITIES — $18,122,583 over 8y, 7.3% of budgetHEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH CHARITIES OF AMERICA — $16,244,716 over 8y, 99% of budgetANIMAL CHARITIES OF AMERICA — $14,648,938 over 8y, 95% of budgetMILITARY FAMILY AND VETERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICA — $12,448,115 over 8y, 98% of budgetEARTHSHARE — $11,175,181 over 8y, 37% of budgetCHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES LOCAL — $10,804,443 over 7y, 100% of budgetCOMMUNITY FIRST - AMERICA'S CHARITIES — $8,964,474 over 8y, 87% of budgetCHRISTIAN CHARITIES USA — $8,960,991 over 8y, 95% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $7,574,140 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN SERVICE CHARITIES INC — $6,880,924 over 5y, 85% of budgetAMERICAS BEST LOCAL CHARITIES — $6,501,035 over 8y, 7.1% of budgetCONSERVATION & PRESERVATION CHARITIES OF AMERICA DBA CONSERVE NOW — $5,895,048 over 8y, 95% of budgetMILITARY SUPPORT GROUPS OF AMERICA — $5,609,761 over 8y, 99% of budgetMEDICAL RESEARCH CHARITIES INC — $3,565,371 over 8y, 91% of budgetALOHA UNITED WAY INC — $3,425,578 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $3,257,826 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC — $2,494,590 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLOCAL ANIMAL CHARITIES OF AMERICA — $2,449,728 over 8y, 97% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $2,407,683 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN FIRST - AMERICA'S CHARITIES — $2,385,502 over 5y, 81% of budgetCATHOLIC SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICA — $2,249,388 over 3y, 99% of budgetHUMAN & CIVIL RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICA — $2,228,421 over 8y, 56% of budgetLOCAL INDEPENDENT CHARITIES OF TEXAS — $2,215,927 over 8y, 29% of budgetCANCERCURE OF AMERICA- CARE UNDERSTAND RESEARCH & END — $2,061,486 over 3y, 95% of budgetFONDOS UNIDOS DE PUERTO RICO INC & UNITED WAY PUERTO RICO — $2,046,582 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $1,954,847 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDRENS CHARITIES OF AMERICA — $1,930,521 over 3y, 96% of budgetCOMMUNITY SHARES OF COLORADO INC — $1,797,346 over 8y, 11% of budgetHEALTH FIRST - AMERICA'S CHARITIES — $1,771,596 over 5y, 57% of budgetCHILDRENS MED RES CHARITIES OF AMER DBA CHILDRENS MED & RES CHAR OF AMER — $1,618,017 over 3y, 95% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $1,539,982 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $1,530,272 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE FUND INC — $1,507,599 over 8y, 90% of budgetAMERICAS MOST COST EFFECTIVE CHARITIES — $1,506,890 over 3y, 95% of budgetEARTHSHARE CHAPTERS INC — $1,445,748 over 8y, 49% of budgetRAPPAHANNOCK UNITED WAY INC — $1,419,419 over 8y, 12% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC — $1,228,049 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD AID INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,204,260 over 8y, 96% of budgetCHARITY WITHOUT BORDERS — $1,195,787 over 3y, 88% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $1,185,956 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetWOMEN CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE CHARITIES OF AMERICA — $1,045,621 over 3y, 89% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $1,038,331 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $1,036,481 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLGBT CHARITIES INC — $1,005,424 over 8y, 86% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAS BEST CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds Global Impact ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH CHARITIES OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL CHARITIES OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds MILITARY FAMILY AND VETERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds EARTHSHARE ↗
  • Who funds CHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES LOCAL ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FIRST - AMERICA'S CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CHARITIES USA ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN SERVICE CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAS BEST LOCAL CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION & PRESERVATION CHARITIES OF AMERICA DBA CONSERVE NOW ↗
  • Who funds MILITARY SUPPORT GROUPS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL RESEARCH CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ALOHA UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds LOCAL ANIMAL CHARITIES OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN FIRST - AMERICA'S CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN & CIVIL RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds LOCAL INDEPENDENT CHARITIES OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds CANCERCURE OF AMERICA- CARE UNDERSTAND RESEARCH & END ↗
  • Who funds FONDOS UNIDOS DE PUERTO RICO INC & UNITED WAY PUERTO RICO ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS CHARITIES OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SHARES OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH FIRST - AMERICA'S CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS MED RES CHARITIES OF AMER DBA CHILDRENS MED & RES CHAR OF AMER ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAS MOST COST EFFECTIVE CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds EARTHSHARE CHAPTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds RAPPAHANNOCK UNITED WAY INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Federal Employees Sup…Campaigning for Chari…The United Way of the…Global ImpactThe United Way of Cen…United Way of Kitsap …United Way of South H…Rappahannock United W…United Way California…America's CharitiesUnited Way of Tucson …The 3000 Club
Federal Employees Support for Cfc Charitable Giving IncorporatedCO102× affinity58 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Federal Employees Support for Cfc Charitable Giving Incorporated · Campaigning for Charities · The United Way of the Greater Dayton Area · Global Impact · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · United Way of Kitsap County · United Way of South Hampton Roads · Rappahannock United Way Inc · United Way California Capital Region · America's Charities · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · The 3000 Club

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Give Back Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 180%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
  • Helping Up Mission Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity of the Chesapeake Inc — 4% of income from government
  • The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
18get no government money at all
45report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Give Back Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Give Back Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 1436 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines