· Private foundation
Amon G Carter Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k28 grants · $150k
- $10k–50k47 grants · $1.0M
- $50k–250k80 grants · $6.1M
- $250k+17 grants · $33M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMON CARTER MUSEUM | $16,725,652 |
| TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY | $5,750,000 |
| TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY | $3,000,000 |
| RIVERTREE ACADEMY | $2,000,000 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER TARRANT CO | $1,000,000 |
| TEXAS HEALTH RESOURCES | $500,000 |
| COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| NEW LEAF COMMUNITY SERVICES | $500,000 |
| TEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY | $500,000 |
| MANEGAIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER | $500,000 |
| FAMILY FIRST | $250,000 |
| PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER | $250,000 |
| RECOVERY RESOURCE COUNCIL | $250,000 |
| FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $250,000 |
| METHODIST HEALTH SYSTEM | $250,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
151 repeat relationships — 82 still active in FY2024, 69 since wound down; 77 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACAMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART4× · 2020–2024 · $52M · revenue +28% · 71% of their budget
- TCTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY4× · 2020–2024 · $6.3M · revenue +40%
- RARIVERTREE ACADEMY2× · 2021–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +55%
Funded once
- ACAmon Carter Museumone grant, 2017 · $9.3M
- TCTexas Christian Universityone grant, 2017 · $3.1M
- YOYMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worthone grant, 2017 · $1.5M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…
The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.
The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.
Support law enforcement and promote public safety awareness and crime prevention in Fort Worth.
The trinity charter schools system has 11 campuses in texas. all 11 campuses work with youth who have emotional difficulties, and need active engagement in planning and guiding their own academic careers through student led credit…
With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…
At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…
To recognize the accomplishments and contributions of our outstanding Texas business leaders and to perpetuate and inspire the values of entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity, and community leadership in all generations of Texans.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.
The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.
Progress Texas is a non-profit media organization advocating for progressive ideals and policies in our state.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of North Texas and the most unlike its peers is Onesight Essilorluxottica Foundation Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
202 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 202 of the 396 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART ↗
- Who funds EVENT FACILITIES FORT WORTH INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds RIVERTREE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY ↗
- Who funds FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds TEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Texas Health Resources Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FAMILY FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds New Leaf Community Services ↗
- Who funds SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN FORT WORTH INITIATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
- Who funds ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX ↗
- Who funds Recovery Resource Council ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Amon G Carter-Star Tele Emply Fund · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · Ann L Rhodes and Carol Greene Rhodes · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Mary Potishman Lard Trust Walker C Friedman Co Trustee · The Morris Foundation · Helen Irwin Littauer Educational Trust · United Way of Tarrant County · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Amon G Carter Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Amon G Carter Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Amon G Carter Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.