Virginia · Nonprofit
PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION
PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION (Virginia) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,966,190 to it, the largest being THE SUSAN THOMPSON BUFFETT FOUNDATION ($2,658,455). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2024
- $1.4M
- Funders on record
- 23
- Grants received
- $4.0M
- Net assets
- $1.2M
What Pro-Choice Virginia Foundation does
Mission
Repro rising virginia foundation supports and protects as fundamental freedoms every person's bodily autonomy, reproductive decision-making, and access to the full continuum of sexual and reproductive health care without barriers. Centered in racial and gender justice, the foundation supports education, leadership training and other programs to advance reproductive freedom, combat stigma, and promote sound public policy.
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.
Program
On its FY2024 return the organization reported a significant change in how it conducts a program.
Organization removed itself from fiscal sponsorship for the vrea program and sent remaining funds to birth in color.
Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 3).
Rise up for repro: student advocacy fellowship program seeks to prepare the next generation of leaders and changemakers in the reproductive health, rights, and justice movements. This program is an effective force for transforming students into advocates as they lead meaningful projects on their campuses or in surrounding communities. In this one-year academic program, two students are chosen for each campus and work as a team. Each fellow develops advocacy and leadership skills through a series of course modules, a capstone project, and an ongoing mentorship with a rrvaf staff organizer or graduate of the fellowship. To ensure that the projects include equity and highlight(continued on schedule o)intersectionality, we collaborate with community-based reproductive rights and social justice leaders and organizations to provide a full-spectrum progressive advocacy space. During the second semester, students choose a grassroots capstone project that will create direct change and service to the university community, such as identifying barriers to sexual and reproductive healthcare, raising awareness of the need for services or reforms, or developing pathways to establish policies and…
$1,080,288 spentof which $168,299 as grants100% of program spending
The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $1,080,288.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $602k to $1.8M (+191%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2021 10%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
96% of PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (51% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Chief executive
Tarina Keene
Executive director
As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 5 funders, grant income fell $541k → $241k.
9 of 23 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 18% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 67% of grant income and the top three 80%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
29% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 79% · 2018 88% · 2019 83% · 2020 83% · 2021 54% · 2022 84% · 2023 86% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
50% of PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 43% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION draws 97% of its grant income from funders outside Virginia, across 8 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $714k arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION has grown faster than three-quarters of the 8,121 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 8,121 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Organizations like PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Virginia
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
87% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
36%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Part of a family of 1 related entity
- Repro Rising Virginia · exempt
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION?
- PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION (Virginia) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,966,190 to it, the largest being THE SUSAN THOMPSON BUFFETT FOUNDATION ($2,658,455). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION have?
- IRS filings report 23 organizations giving $3,966,190 in grants to PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION?
- THE SUSAN THOMPSON BUFFETT FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $2,658,455 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like PRO-CHOICE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Virginia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 23 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing